On 11 July 2011 06:09, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Just one more note, though: you don't even have filed an ITP for this package,
> which could also have drawn more interest to this package.
Hi Michael. Thanks for the response. Since I didn't get a response
for the RFP, I thought I would wait u
ms do not offer spaced repetition drill features. Combining the
two dramatically reduces the amount of "busy work" that is required
when doing self-study. My motivation for asking for inclusion is that
my users are requesting it.
Web page: http://jldrill.rubyforge.org/
Mike Cha
On 16 June 2011 15:43, Norbert Preining wrote:
> rake clean_debian
> (in /tmp/buildd/jldrill-0.5.1)
> rake aborted!
> Could not find RubyGem rspec (= 1.3.1)
> /tmp/buildd/jldrill-0.5.1/Rakefile.rb:4
Thank you for trying it. That was a bit
stupid of me. The Rakefile requires rspec and
a few othe
ally, I have removed some data files that
probably weren't DFSG free (one in which I couldn't contact the
author for license information and one which was CC-SA-BY-NC)
I believe this fixes all the potential license problems.
Thank you for your consideration,
Mike Charlton
e moment. I've kept careful track of
everything and I think the things I am including in the debian file
are correct, but it if someone could check it over I would be really
grateful.
Thank you for your consideration
Mike Charlton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
5 matches
Mail list logo
