Re: RFS: truncate (now it's free, for real!)

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Mayer
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:09:05 +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Not if you read the man page: > dd if=/dev/null of=totruncate bs=1 seek=positiontotruncate Oh! You are right, this works. But unfortunatly this behavior is not explained clearly in my manpage :-( Only a flag "notrunc" is mentioned:

Re: RFS: truncate (now it's free, for real!)

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Mayer
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 22:46:21 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't do > anything that dd doesn't. Oh, yes, it is worth it! In fact, some month ago I wrote a tool like this for my personal use to cut movie files which are slightly to

Re: RFS: truncate (now it's free, for real!)

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Mayer
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:09:05 +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Not if you read the man page: > dd if=/dev/null of=totruncate bs=1 seek=positiontotruncate Oh! You are right, this works. But unfortunatly this behavior is not explained clearly in my manpage :-( Only a flag "notrunc" is mentioned:

Re: RFS: truncate (now it's free, for real!)

2004-03-08 Thread Michael Mayer
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 22:46:21 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Is something so trivial worth packaging? It sounds like it doesn't do > anything that dd doesn't. Oh, yes, it is worth it! In fact, some month ago I wrote a tool like this for my personal use to cut movie files which are slightly to

Re: RFS: Scorched3D Sponsor wanted

2004-01-21 Thread Michael Mayer
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 16:27:43 +0100, Tom wrote: > My packages, including orig., diff, dsc are at: > > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ > > These packages have gone through several iterations now, and the most > recent ones should be good, except maybe for some minor things I > missed, which I wo

Re: RFS: Scorched3D Sponsor wanted

2004-01-21 Thread Michael Mayer
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 16:27:43 +0100, Tom wrote: > My packages, including orig., diff, dsc are at: > > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ > > These packages have gone through several iterations now, and the most > recent ones should be good, except maybe for some minor things I > missed, which I wo

Re: Bootsplash packages.

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Mayer
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 16:17:21 -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote: > Also are there any public servers where I could put the packages? http://mentors.debian.net Michael

Re: Bootsplash packages.

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Mayer
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 16:17:21 -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote: > Also are there any public servers where I could put the packages? http://mentors.debian.net Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New-Boy: GPG Trouble + some more [long]

2003-11-07 Thread Michael Mayer
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 18:43:28 +0100, blacksheep wrote: > I know I should write some more man pages, but `lintian' says > something more I cannot understand: Try lintin plml*deb | lintian-info > E: plml: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/ You install man pages in /usr/man/, they sh

Re: New-Boy: GPG Trouble + some more [long]

2003-11-07 Thread Michael Mayer
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 18:43:28 +0100, blacksheep wrote: > I know I should write some more man pages, but `lintian' says > something more I cannot understand: Try lintin plml*deb | lintian-info > E: plml: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/man/ You install man pages in /usr/man/, they sh

Re: Error on dpkg-buildpackage

2003-11-07 Thread Michael Mayer
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:52:48PM -0300, José Oliveira wrote: > This is second package that I try to build and generates this exactly > error. what it must be made? It is a known error in dh-make (Bug #213118), simply quote the "$(CFLAGS)" part in the line containing the ./configure command to st

Re: Error on dpkg-buildpackage

2003-11-07 Thread Michael Mayer
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:52:48PM -0300, José Oliveira wrote: > This is second package that I try to build and generates this exactly > error. what it must be made? It is a known error in dh-make (Bug #213118), simply quote the "$(CFLAGS)" part in the line containing the ./configure command to st

Re: OT: Removing Spam caused by this list

2003-11-04 Thread michael-mayer
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > BTW: Since I posted to this ML (and debian-devel), I get more mail > > worms than my mailbox at my ISP can hold. Strange for linux developer > > MLs... > > The MLs are mirrored to usenet, and recent worms (Swen) search the > loca

Re: OT: Removing Spam caused by this list

2003-11-04 Thread michael-mayer
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:32:35PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > BTW: Since I posted to this ML (and debian-devel), I get more mail > > worms than my mailbox at my ISP can hold. Strange for linux developer > > MLs... > > The MLs are mirrored to usenet, and recent worms (Swen) search the > loca

Re: RFS: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-11-04 Thread michael-mayer
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:53:54PM -0500, David I. Lehn wrote: > I'm willing to sponsor this package if you haven't found someone else to > do it yet. I recently started using AVR chips and avrdude. Great! I'm new to the AVR, too. Recently I bought this very nice butterfly board an it works really

Re: RFS: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-11-04 Thread michael-mayer
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:53:54PM -0500, David I. Lehn wrote: > I'm willing to sponsor this package if you haven't found someone else to > do it yet. I recently started using AVR chips and avrdude. Great! I'm new to the AVR, too. Recently I bought this very nice butterfly board an it works really

Re: RFS: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Mayer
Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > Description: Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers > > Just a thought - perhaps, to find someone who would be personally > interested in the package, is it sensible to post an RFS to a more > specific list? Do you have any suggestions where? It is a very specific p

Re: RFS: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Mayer
Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > Description: Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers > > Just a thought - perhaps, to find someone who would be personally > interested in the package, is it sensible to post an RFS to a more > specific list? Do you have any suggestions where? It is a very specific p

RFM: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-24 Thread Michael Mayer
This tool is the successor of the old avrprog shipped with woody. I'm already done packaging it and would be happy to get some comments on my work. You can find the files at http://mitglied.lycos.de/tenbahrt/debian Michael Description: Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers Avrdude is t

RFM: avrdude - Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers

2003-10-24 Thread Michael Mayer
This tool is the successor of the old avrprog shipped with woody. I'm already done packaging it and would be happy to get some comments on my work. You can find the files at http://mitglied.lycos.de/tenbahrt/debian Michael Description: Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrollers Avrdude is t