Re: new upstream Cogito conflicts with GNU Interactive Tools

On Thu, 02 Jun 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:51:12PM -0500, Michael Janssen wrote: > > > Le Jeudi 02 Juin 2005 21:25, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit : > > > > Should I just make my cogito package Conflict with the GNU Interactive > > >

Re: new upstream Cogito conflicts with GNU Interactive Tools

My suggestion is to rename the binary in the cogito package to something which makes more sense, perhaps cogito-git. -- Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: My First Package. Wheee.

o all the servers at once).. the developers reference section 6 covers package uploads, but doesn't cover the dput method right now.. hope these answer your questions. I'm a fairly new maintainer as well, so anyone please correct me if i'm wrong here. -- Michael Janssen - Jamuraa - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 87F1 92C4 44AA 4105 B1C4 EDEC D995 9620 C00E 9159 pgpTyTI7VaiPm.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: My First Package. Wheee.

o all the servers at once).. the developers reference section 6 covers package uploads, but doesn't cover the dput method right now.. hope these answer your questions. I'm a fairly new maintainer as well, so anyone please correct me if i'm wrong here. -- Michael Janssen - Jamuraa - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 87F1 92C4 44AA 4105 B1C4 EDEC D995 9620 C00E 9159 PGP signature

New Packaging questions

l-* that the rest of the debian crew puts out, and currently it looks like it's moving a little to fast for me to keep up (correct me if I'm wrong, plz, I'm going off the idea that if they track preXX they're keeping pretty up-to-date). Anyway - thoughts/suggestions/flames? Mich

New Packaging questions

l-* that the rest of the debian crew puts out, and currently it looks like it's moving a little to fast for me to keep up (correct me if I'm wrong, plz, I'm going off the idea that if they track preXX they're keeping pretty up-to-date). Anyway - thoughts/suggestions/flam

Looking for sponsor

and am nearing completion of re-packaging. The new packages can be gotten from: http://base0.net/~jamuraa/new-debian-packs/ or from sources.list: deb http://www.base0.net/~jamuraa/new-debian-packs/ ./ deb-src http://www.base0.net/~jamuraa/new-debian-packs/sources/ ./ Michael Janssen - Jamuraa

Looking for sponsor

and am nearing completion of re-packaging. The new packages can be gotten from: http://base0.net/~jamuraa/new-debian-packs/ or from sources.list: deb http://www.base0.net/~jamuraa/new-debian-packs/ ./ deb-src http://www.base0.net/~jamuraa/new-debian-packs/sources/ ./ Michael Janssen

Looking for sponsor

-packs/sources/ ./ Any comments or suggestions on these packages would be welcome as well. Michael Janssen (NM awaiting AM) GPG Fingerprint: 87F1 92C4 44AA 4105 B1C4 EDEC D995 9620 C00E 9159 pgpCpeL3CtUK6.pgp Description: PGP signature

Looking for sponsor

-packs/sources/ ./ Any comments or suggestions on these packages would be welcome as well. Michael Janssen (NM awaiting AM) GPG Fingerprint: 87F1 92C4 44AA 4105 B1C4 EDEC D995 9620 C00E 9159 PGP signature

Re: quality of a package

Most of the newer search engines fix this problem by using the term "Relevance"(sp) which would be more clear IMHO. Michael Janssen Wanna-Be Debian developer

Re: quality of a package

Most of the newer search engines fix this problem by using the term "Relevance"(sp) which would be more clear IMHO. Michael Janssen Wanna-Be Debian developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]