Re: To maintaining a package....

2008-09-26 Thread Maximilian Gaß
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > ...well no, you got to user the BTS[1] control server[2] to rename the > current orphaned bug[3] in a ITP[3] and then start work on the > package. Shouldn't it be an ITA - Intent to Adopt? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: tmux

2008-09-24 Thread Maximilian Gaß
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:03:25PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > Perhaps, someone else would like to provide some comments on that ? tmux's code is quite well good indeed, much better than the mess inside screen. I hade a little part in development about a year ago. Nicholas is very reponsive an

Re: RFS: arename

2008-04-08 Thread Maximilian Gaß
tp://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture> 'any' would build a package for each architecture. Greetings, Maximilian Gaß -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: arename

2008-04-07 Thread Maximilian Gaß
tes of Git-based packaging (for example, Joey Hess) seem to do it this way. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Maximilian Gaß -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]