Re: problem replacing package

, but only that it exists (just searched docs and did not find anything about it) -- Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I don't wish to receive spam to this address. Varovanie: Nezelam si na tuto adresu dostavat akukolvek reklamnu postu. My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.

Re: problem replacing package

4 ("Version numbering"). OK, I will try, even if it's not exactly what I meaned. -> (BTW, I tried to honour your Mail-Followup-To: and cc you, but my ISP's -> mail server is blocked by yours, so I won't bother trying again.) Sorry - my fault - forgot to tell mutt th

Re: problem replacing package

-> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote: -> > I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add -> > these to control file: -> > -> > Provides: libogg0 -> > Replaces: libogg0 -> > Conflicts: libogg0 -&g

problem replacing package

nge any of dpkg-architecture variables, or are they here only for defining the base architecture (i386 even for pentiumII or k6 processors)? Thanks much -- Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I don't wish to receive spam to this address.

Re: problem replacing package

, but only that it exists (just searched docs and did not find anything about it) -- Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I don't wish to receive spam to this address. Varovanie: Nezelam si na tuto adresu dostavat akukolvek reklamnu postu.

Re: problem replacing package

4 ("Version numbering"). OK, I will try, even if it's not exactly what I meaned. -> (BTW, I tried to honour your Mail-Followup-To: and cc you, but my ISP's -> mail server is blocked by yours, so I won't bother trying again.) Sorry - my fault - forgot to tell mutt th

Re: problem replacing package

-> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote: -> > I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add -> > these to control file: -> > -> > Provides: libogg0 -> > Replaces: libogg0 -> > Conflicts: lib

problem replacing package

nge any of dpkg-architecture variables, or are they here only for defining the base architecture (i386 even for pentiumII or k6 processors)? Thanks much -- Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I don't wish to receive spam to this address.

Re: question on interaction between net-base and replacement daemons

ll to update-inetd enough? First remove -> the existing identd and replace it w/ oidentd? I can not use alternatives -> because oidentd's behavior depends on command line options. 1. i don;t think you should remove old identd; 2. what advantages does oidentd give ? -- Matus "