Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:11:50PM +0200, Martin Dickopp wrote:
>> I suspect I'm missing some obvious aspect of how the propagation into
>> testing works. Could somebody tell me what document I should read, or
>>
Hi,
I'm trying to understand the PTS source package page of the udev package
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udev.html). The top-most line in the
"Latest News" section is
* [2005-07-03] Accepted 0.060-1 in unstable (low) (Marco d'Itri)
i.e. it indicates that the latest version 0.060-1 was acc
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1954 +0200]:
>> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that. What hotplug
>> abilities could/should a tool which is specifically intended for
>> m
Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Dickopp wrote:
>
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- letting
>> users access removable media. The difference is that pmount allows
>> users to mount and unmount these devices manually,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1954 +0200]:
>> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that. What hotplug
>> abilities could/should a tool which is specifically intended for
>> m
Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Dickopp wrote:
>
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- letting
>> users access removable media. The difference is that pmount allows
>> users to mount and unmount these devices manually,
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]:
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem --
>> letting users access removable media. The difference is that
>> pmount allows
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Martin Dickopp [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:22:22 +0200]:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > Anyway, couldn't you possibly create a little tool which would start
>> > a command after remounting
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
>
> Why
Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin Dickopp a écrit :
>
> |Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> |>Be carreful, I heard that sync has not been implemente
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]:
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem --
>> letting users access removable media. The difference is that
>> pmount allows
Adeodato Simà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Martin Dickopp [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:22:22 +0200]:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > Anyway, couldn't you possibly create a little tool which would start
>> > a command after remounting
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
>
> Why
Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin Dickopp a Ãcrit :
>
> |Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> |>Be carreful, I heard that sync has not been implemente
) if the floppy is sync-mounted. This is the case with both
the "vfat" and the "msdos" filesystems. So at least there seems to be
some difference between a sync-mount and an async-mount.
Martin
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- )M
27;t kill any
processes before unmounting:
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
Thanks,
Martin
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- )Martin Dickopp, Dresden, Ger
) if the floppy is sync-mounted. This is the case with both
the "vfat" and the "msdos" filesystems. So at least there seems to be
some difference between a sync-mount and an async-mount.
Martin
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- )M
27;t kill any
processes before unmounting:
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
Thanks,
Martin
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- )Martin Dickopp, Dresden, Ger
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.2128 +0200]:
>> When the device is pulled from the USB port, the script kills all
>> processes that have been accessing the filesystem and then
>> unmounts it.
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.1955 +0200]:
>> I have have written and packaged a script which automatically
>> mounts USB mass storage devices when they are plugged in, and
>> unmounts
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.2128 +0200]:
>> When the device is pulled from the USB port, the script kills all
>> processes that have been accessing the filesystem and then
>> unmounts it.
omatically selected.
.
The script that does the (un)mounting is called by the udev daemon.
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- ) Martin Dickopp, Dresden, Germany((_/)o o(\_))
\ `-'http://www.zero-based.org/`-'(. .)`-'
`-. \_/
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.26.1955 +0200]:
>> I have have written and packaged a script which automatically
>> mounts USB mass storage devices when they are plugged in, and
>> unmounts
omatically selected.
.
The script that does the (un)mounting is called by the udev daemon.
--
,--. ,= ,-_-. =.
/ ,- ) Martin Dickopp, Dresden, Germany((_/)o o(\_))
\ `-'http://www
Sebastian Henschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in the last couple of months, i realized that more and more packages
> are using a file in /etc/default/ for the configuration of their
> init-scripts.
> i searched in debian-devel and debian-mentors, looked into the policy
> 10.7 and asked a mainta
Sebastian Henschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in the last couple of months, i realized that more and more packages
> are using a file in /etc/default/ for the configuration of their
> init-scripts.
> i searched in debian-devel and debian-mentors, looked into the policy
> 10.7 and asked a mainta
26 matches
Mail list logo
