Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
the Policy definition, meaning that this is > > optional (though recommended) behavior. > > Well. In this case: > export CFLAGS=-g > dpkg-buildpackage > > If something doesn't honour CFLAGS, it should be fixed :) But it may happen CXXFLAGS should be set as well :) -- Mariu

Re: how to build debugging binaries

2001-01-28 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
the Policy definition, meaning that this is > > optional (though recommended) behavior. > > Well. In this case: > export CFLAGS=-g > dpkg-buildpackage > > If something doesn't honour CFLAGS, it should be fixed :) But it may happen CXXFLAGS should be set as well :) --

Re: Building: w or w/o Stripping, w or w/o debugging symbols

2001-01-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
its hours. ;) > > If you can avoid changing configure.in and Makefile.in (actually, I hope > that's Makefile.am?), then please do. Otherwise you can end up with huge > diffs to the generated configure and Makefile. But if you can not avoid changing configure.in you can

Re: Building: w or w/o Stripping, w or w/o debugging symbols

2001-01-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
its hours. ;) > > If you can avoid changing configure.in and Makefile.in (actually, I hope > that's Makefile.am?), then please do. Otherwise you can end up with huge > diffs to the generated configure and Makefile. But if you can not avoid changing configure.in you can

Re: config.cache

2001-01-21 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 21 January 2001 22:27, Chris Ruffin wrote: > Should source packages include config.cache? I don't think so, but > I'm not absolutely sure. I would say it shouldn't. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Expo Road Show [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: config.cache

2001-01-21 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 21 January 2001 22:27, Chris Ruffin wrote: > Should source packages include config.cache? I don't think so, but > I'm not absolutely sure. I would say it shouldn't. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki | debian@Linux Expo Road Show [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-14 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
rgument type (it means on a type of applicant in this case). [sorry I couldn't resist ...] -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | (Unofficial Lesser Debian D

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-14 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
its argument type (it means on a type of applicant in this case). [sorry I couldn't resist ...] -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | (Unofficial Lesser Debian D

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-12 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
nd skills with > the packages that I've done. This mean you are already maintaner (you maintain some packages) but you are unofficial maintaner. You don't have a Debian account because such account was not created for you and it doesn't mean your knowledge of Debian policy or/and s

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-12 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
cision which can not improve Debian work's quality of any maintaners (it means unofficial maintaners in this case). Personally I have stopped to investigate reasons of this situation and rules which are neccesary to obtain the DAM approval since I can not treat this procedure seriously. Mariusz - Mariusz Przygodzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dune.home.pl

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-12 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
the packages that I've done. This mean you are already maintaner (you maintain some packages) but you are unofficial maintaner. You don't have a Debian account because such account was not created for you and it doesn't mean your knowledge of Debian policy or/and skills are insuf

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-12 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
atical decision which can not improve Debian work's quality of any maintaners (it means unofficial maintaners in this case). Personally I have stopped to investigate reasons of this situation and rules which are neccesary to obtain the DAM approval since I can not treat this procedure seriously.

Re: Control file problem

2000-12-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
kage line It should be: Source: antlr Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper, fastjar Standards-Version: 3.0.1 Package: antlr Architecture: all Depends: java-virtual-machine Description: A language tool for constructing recogni

Re: Control file problem

2000-12-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
kage line It should be: Source: antlr Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends: debhelper, fastjar Standards-Version: 3.0.1 Package: antlr Architecture: all Depends: java-virtual-machine Description: A language tool for constructing recogni

Re: help: shlibs problem

2000-12-23 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
_PATH. dh_shlibdeps's manpage says: "-ldirectory This option is ignored, for backwards compatibility." -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771 GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771

Re: help: shlibs problem

2000-12-23 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
_PATH. dh_shlibdeps's manpage says: "-ldirectory This option is ignored, for backwards compatibility." -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x4

Re: help: shlibs problem

2000-12-22 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
debian/shlibs.local 2. /etc/dpkg/shlibs.override 3. /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.shlibs 4. /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default". > A workaround (to suppress the warning message) is to do something like this > in your makefile: > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./debian/tmp/usr/lib/ dh_shlibdeps -a > > Not

help: shlibs problem

2000-12-22 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
libfunUtil 0 qub' in shlibs.local with the same warning. The binary package includes libfunUtil.so.0.0.0 and a proper symlink libfunUtil.so.0 to libfunUtil.so.0.0.0. What I am doing wrong? -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: help: shlibs problem

2000-12-22 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
> > Not very pretty, of course. :) But it works without this warning now. Thanks a lot. -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771 GPG Fingerprint: 1990

help: shlibs problem

2000-12-22 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
'libfunUtil 0 qub' in shlibs.local with the same warning. The binary package includes libfunUtil.so.0.0.0 and a proper symlink libfunUtil.so.0 to libfunUtil.so.0.0.0. What I am doing wrong? -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTE

quanta-doc ?

2000-12-08 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/quanta/). I don't know if some of these documents are already maintaned. If yes then maybe I should provide some symlinks only and put an appropriate Suggest in quanta's control only. Waiting for suggestions... Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki

quanta-doc ?

2000-12-08 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/quanta/). I don't know if some of these documents are already maintaned. If yes then maybe I should provide some symlinks only and put an appropriate Suggest in quanta's control only. Waiting for suggestions... Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki

Re: xclass library dilemaa...

2000-12-07 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
thing else. if it was orphaned then adopt it > Should I still build a separate package for it? Can I build it into > the rfb package as a static library? How would I do that? > > -- > Regards, Paul - Mariusz Przygodzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dune.home.pl

Re: xclass library dilemaa...

2000-12-07 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
by anything else. if it was orphaned then adopt it > Should I still build a separate package for it? Can I build it into > the rfb package as a static library? How would I do that? > > -- > Regards, Paul - Mariusz Przygodzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

Re: Why this?

2000-11-27 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
3 for details. > N: > N: Processing binary package libmcal-dev (version 0.6-3) ... > ...SNIP... > > Why does this occur? And what should I do about it? I think libmcal0 package should have a symlink libmcal.so.0->libmcal.so.0.6. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki

Re: Why this?

2000-11-27 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
3 for details. > N: > N: Processing binary package libmcal-dev (version 0.6-3) ... > ...SNIP... > > Why does this occur? And what should I do about it? I think libmcal0 package should have a symlink libmcal.so.0->libmcal.so.0.6. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki

Re: Build-depends: autoconf, automake ?

2000-11-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 26 November 2000 21:17, Steve Robbins wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > On Sunday 26 November 2000 20:40, Steve Robbins wrote: > > > 1. Automake inserts a makefile variable "TAR" into every Makefile.in > > > generated. Upstr

Re: Build-depends: autoconf, automake ?

2000-11-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 26 November 2000 21:22, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > >... > > have to use it just once. Probably you will not avoid to rebuild > > configure stuff but I think it's not a problem, just only bigger > > *.diff.

Re: Build-depends: autoconf, automake ?

2000-11-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
xample. as "preconfigure" in debian/rules because you have to use it just once. Probably you will not avoid to rebuild configure stuff but I think it's not a problem, just only bigger *.diff.gz. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771 GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771

Re: Build-depends: autoconf, automake ?

2000-11-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 26 November 2000 21:17, Steve Robbins wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > On Sunday 26 November 2000 20:40, Steve Robbins wrote: > > > 1. Automake inserts a makefile variable "TAR" into every Makefile.in > > > generated.

Re: Build-depends: autoconf, automake ?

2000-11-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 26 November 2000 21:22, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > >... > > have to use it just once. Probably you will not avoid to rebuild > > configure stuff but I think it's not a problem, just only bigger > > *.diff.

Re: Build-depends: autoconf, automake ?

2000-11-26 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
xample. as "preconfigure" in debian/rules because you have to use it just once. Probably you will not avoid to rebuild configure stuff but I think it's not a problem, just only bigger *.diff.gz. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL

Re: Contact?

2000-11-20 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
s, just like applicants. We (applicants) understand it. -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG: 0x42FAD771 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771

Re: lintian doesn't like icons in png format

2000-11-20 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
. The icons should use only the 24 colors present in cmap.xpm, which > comes with the menu package. > > 4. The background area of the icon should be transparent, if possible. Yes, you right. I am sorry for my ignorance. I was looking for this information in wrong place. Mariusz -- Marius

Re: Contact?

2000-11-20 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
s, just like applicants. We (applicants) understand it. -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG: 0x42FAD771 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771 -- To UNSUB

Re: lintian doesn't like icons in png format

2000-11-20 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
. The icons should use only the 24 colors present in cmap.xpm, which > comes with the menu package. > > 4. The background area of the icon should be transparent, if possible. Yes, you right. I am sorry for my ignorance. I was looking for this information in wrong place. Mariusz -- Marius

lintian doesn't like icons in png format [was Re: icon.png => debian/ ?]

2000-11-19 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 19 November 2000 23:27, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 11:18:35PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > Upstream sources have no icon for some application. > > How I can add an icon to debian/ in other format than xpm ? > > When I try to do it wi

Re: icon.png => debian/ ?

2000-11-19 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
ncoded icon.png has less size than icon.xpm in my case, so *.diff.gz has also less size. Good. Thanks a lot. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG: 0x42FA

icon.png => debian/ ?

2000-11-19 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
still trying to find some workaround and I don't want to change *.orig.tar.gz. Any suggestion? Thanks in advance, Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl

lintian doesn't like icons in png format [was Re: icon.png => debian/ ?]

2000-11-19 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Sunday 19 November 2000 23:27, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 11:18:35PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > Upstream sources have no icon for some application. > > How I can add an icon to debian/ in other format than xpm ? > > When I try to do it wi

Re: icon.png => debian/ ?

2000-11-19 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
ncoded icon.png has less size than icon.xpm in my case, so *.diff.gz has also less size. Good. Thanks a lot. Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG: 0x42FA

icon.png => debian/ ?

2000-11-19 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
still trying to find some workaround and I don't want to change *.orig.tar.gz. Any suggestion? Thanks in advance, Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl

simply curious lintian messages

2000-11-11 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
fined()?) ? Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 0x42FAD771 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771 http://www.dune.home.pl

simply curious lintian messages

2000-11-11 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
fined()?) ? Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 0x42FAD771 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771 http://www.dune.home.pl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Needs sponsor for qtcups

2000-11-05 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
ty to save his printer configuration locally. -- Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (home) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)

Needs sponsor for qtcups

2000-11-05 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
ty to save his printer configuration locally. -- Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (home) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

how change my e-mail in NM queue?

2000-11-04 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
I am registered in the new maintainer database as an un-assigned applicant with my business e-mail account. I would like to change it to my new private account. How I can do it? Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

how change my e-mail in NM queue?

2000-11-04 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
I am registered in the new maintainer database as an un-assigned applicant with my business e-mail account. I would like to change it to my new private account. How I can do it? Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

RE: Request For Sponsor: QtCups & Kups

2000-11-02 Thread Mariusz . Przygodzki
my sponsor as I'm on NM queue. > These are my first debian packages so a constructive criticism welcome. > > Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions. > > Mariusz Przygodzki > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Request For Sponsor: QtCups & Kups

2000-11-02 Thread Mariusz . Przygodzki
sponsor as I'm on NM queue. > These are my first debian packages so a constructive criticism welcome. > > Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions. > > Mariusz Przygodzki > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > w

Request For Sponsor: QtCups & Kups

2000-10-31 Thread Mariusz . Przygodzki
re my first debian packages so a constructive criticism welcome. Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions. Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Request For Sponsor: QtCups & Kups

2000-10-31 Thread Mariusz . Przygodzki
re my first debian packages so a constructive criticism welcome. Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions. Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Needs sponsor for qtcups

2000-10-27 Thread Mariusz . Przygodzki
nt library. It is intended to be a replacement for "lpr" and will support the same syntax. This front-end allows the user to select and configure printers in a nice interface. The user has also the ability to save his printer configuration locally. Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Needs sponsor for qtcups

2000-10-27 Thread Mariusz . Przygodzki
nt library. It is intended to be a replacement for "lpr" and will support the same syntax. This front-end allows the user to select and configure printers in a nice interface. The user has also the ability to save his printer configuration locally. Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROT