I packaged ROX-Filer (http://rox.sf.net/). Some time ago version 2.0.0 was
released as stable so I changed few things in packaging. Now I have 3
packages:
1. rox - "stable release only" version of ROX-Filer
2. rox-snapshot - CVS snapshot of development version
3. rox-filer-hrw - rox-snapshot wi
I packaged ROX-Filer (http://rox.sf.net/). Some time ago version 2.0.0 was
released as stable so I changed few things in packaging. Now I have 3
packages:
1. rox - "stable release only" version of ROX-Filer
2. rox-snapshot - CVS snapshot of development version
3. rox-filer-hrw - rox-snapshot wi
was debianized by Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Mon, 25 Dec 2000 12:25:01 +0100.
CVS version was build by Marcin Juszkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 22:46:20 +0200.
This version was build by Marcin Juszkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:15:
was debianized by Jan Wagemakers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Mon, 25 Dec 2000 12:25:01 +0100.
CVS version was build by Marcin Juszkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 22:46:20 +0200.
This version was build by Marcin Juszkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:15:
I'm not Debian developer but I maintain few packages outside.
Main package is rox (ROX-Filer). Some time ago new version (3.5.9) of
Debian policy came out and version 3.5.6 is marked as 'out of date'.
After checking upgrading-checklist.txt I don't know clearly if I can
bump it or not - can some
I'm not Debian developer but I maintain few packages outside.
Main package is rox (ROX-Filer). Some time ago new version (3.5.9) of
Debian policy came out and version 3.5.6 is marked as 'out of date'.
After checking upgrading-checklist.txt I don't know clearly if I can
bump it or not - can some
At now I don't request for sponsor (yet) but want someone to look at this
package - it is lintian & linda clean but maybe there are some errors or
Debian Policy violations. At now it also depends on one package from
'experimental' (shared-mime-info packaged by Filip Van Raemdonck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
At now I don't request for sponsor (yet) but want someone to look at this
package - it is lintian & linda clean but maybe there are some errors or
Debian Policy violations. At now it also depends on one package from
'experimental' (shared-mime-info packaged by Filip Van Raemdonck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
It was 2003-01-03 22:55 when Yven Leist wrote:
> > from package - only 24 colors for icon is too small.
>
> Does anyone know the reason for this limitation? I've looked at the menu
> info page, but couldn't find anything explanatory there.
I think that it is 8bit color systems - if you have 256
It was 2003-01-03 22:55 when Yven Leist wrote:
> > from package - only 24 colors for icon is too small.
>
> Does anyone know the reason for this limitation? I've looked at the menu
> info page, but couldn't find anything explanatory there.
I think that it is 8bit color systems - if you have 256
It was 2003-01-03 12:07 when Michael Banck wrote:
> 1. You've made a debian-native source package (only tar.gz and .dsc).
> You probably want to make a normal debian source package (.orig.tar.gz,
> .diff.gz and .dsc)
>From my point of view it is easier to make "debian native" source package
then
It was 2003-01-03 12:07 when Michael Banck wrote:
> 1. You've made a debian-native source package (only tar.gz and .dsc).
> You probably want to make a normal debian source package (.orig.tar.gz,
> .diff.gz and .dsc)
>From my point of view it is easier to make "debian native" source package
then
12 matches
Mail list logo
