Re: adopt orphaned package cpuburn

2004-05-27 Thread Lucas Albers
Erik Schanze said: > Lucas Albers: >> I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me >> on >> it for the upload. >> > Are there any files to look over? > Did you realized that the project website and author email has changed? > &g

Re: adopt orphaned package cpuburn

2004-05-27 Thread Lucas Albers
Erik Schanze said: > Lucas Albers: >> I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me >> on >> it for the upload. >> > Are there any files to look over? > Did you realized that the project website and author email has changed? > &g

Re: adopt orphaned package cpuburn

2004-05-27 Thread Lucas Albers
Erik Schanze said: > Lucas Albers: >> I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me >> on >> it for the upload. >> > Are there any files to look over? > Did you realized that the project website and author email has changed? > &g

Re: adopt orphaned package cpuburn

2004-05-27 Thread Lucas Albers
Erik Schanze said: > Lucas Albers: >> I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me >> on >> it for the upload. >> > Are there any files to look over? > Did you realized that the project website and author email has changed? > &g

adopt orphaned package cpuburn

2004-05-25 Thread Lucas Albers
I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me on it for the upload. The current maintainer of cpuburn, Indra Kusuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see h

adopt orphaned package cpuburn

2004-05-25 Thread Lucas Albers
I'd like to adopt this package, and I would need someone to sponsor me on it for the upload. The current maintainer of cpuburn, Indra Kusuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see h

maintaining new packages,upgrading to newer upstream versions

2004-02-15 Thread Lucas Albers
I just recently started using debian, 6 months ago. I have run into a number of situations in which I needed to build a package, or thought a package could be useful. The packages I have been working on are: sara security scanner, nagios-modules, nagios doesn't have all the modules package for nagi

maintaining new packages,upgrading to newer upstream versions

2004-02-15 Thread Lucas Albers
I just recently started using debian, 6 months ago. I have run into a number of situations in which I needed to build a package, or thought a package could be useful. The packages I have been working on are: sara security scanner, nagios-modules, nagios doesn't have all the modules package for nagi

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Lucas Albers
Dude we have cars, don't reinvent the automobile. Grsecurity does this already. http://www.grsecurity.net and 10,000 times more stuff. Some sample kernel config options, so you can get a brief overview: http://www.cs.montana.edu/faq/grsec/ It specifically has tpe, and has been extensivelly vetted f

Re: Packaging a Kernel module (i386 only)

2003-12-09 Thread Lucas Albers
Dude we have cars, don't reinvent the automobile. Grsecurity does this already. http://www.grsecurity.net and 10,000 times more stuff. Some sample kernel config options, so you can get a brief overview: http://www.cs.montana.edu/faq/grsec/ It specifically has tpe, and has been extensivelly vetted f

making frottle package

2003-12-08 Thread Lucas Albers
Greetings. My first debian package... I am attempting to compile frottle, a wireless traffic shaper. I have read the new-maint guide. In the INSTALL documentation for frottle it says thus: - There is a 'feature' in iptables which may cause make to fail. If you get errors like: /usr/inc

making frottle package

2003-12-08 Thread Lucas Albers
Greetings. My first debian package... I am attempting to compile frottle, a wireless traffic shaper. I have read the new-maint guide. In the INSTALL documentation for frottle it says thus: - There is a 'feature' in iptables which may cause make to fail. If you get errors like: /usr/inc