Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2014-04-13 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 2014-02-09 09:27, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote: On 7 February 2014 22:18, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote: Hi Vincent, Many thanks for uploading this. However, the package has been stuck in NEW for

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2014-02-09 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 9 February 2014 09:27, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> On 7 February 2014 22:18, Vincent Cheng wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote: >>>> Hi Vincent, >>>> >>>> Ma

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 7 February 2014 22:18, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> Hi Vincent, >> >> Many thanks for uploading this. However, the package has been stuck in >> NEW for the last few weeks. I'm not sure what the problem is,

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2014-01-18 Thread Thomas Leonard
users will see, and that's what > they'd install), but it makes this transition less of a hassle if you > revert to the same source package name. Done: https://mentors.debian.net/package/zeroinstall-injector Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/ GPG: 9242 9807 C98

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-12-23 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 2013-12-23 19:59, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 23 décembre 2013 15:22 CET, Thomas Leonard : You are renaming the source package. Is it really necessary? This is possible, but it is a bit painful to manage. With a new source package, you need to issue a -1 version. This means to add an epoch

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-12-23 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 2013-12-22 12:03, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 22 décembre 2013 12:10 CET, Thomas Leonard : "ITP stands for Intend to package. These are packages which not exist in Debian yet. Such packages need to go through NEW. That is the queue on ftp-master for packages uploaded for the first

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-12-22 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 2013-11-23 15:46, Thomas Leonard wrote: On 2013-11-16 22:26, Eriberto wrote: A doubt: where is the ITP bug??? Thanks! Regards, I'm not sure what you mean. Do I need to file a bug somewhere as well? According to http://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto: "ITP stands for

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-12-08 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 2013-10-16 15:08, Thomas Leonard wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. This saves around 100 MB when deploying to a

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-11-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
een maintaining this package as a DM for several years; just I need someone to approve the rename as I don't have permission to do it myself. https://mentors.debian.net/package/0install Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/ GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-11-23 Thread Thomas Leonard
[ sorry for the late reply; I didn't get an email notification for some reason ] On 2013-11-16 22:26, Eriberto wrote: A doubt: where is the ITP bug??? Thanks! Regards, I'm not sure what you mean. Do I need to file a bug somewhere as well? According to http://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-

Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-10-16 Thread Thomas Leonard
the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no longer a DD. * Package name: 0install Version : 2.3.3-2 Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard * URL : http://0install.net/ * License : GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1 Section

Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1

2012-09-14 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 7 September 2012 16:44, Thomas Leonard wrote: > On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens wrote: [...] >> Hi Thomas, >> >> The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. >> http://0install.net/install-source.html >> http://downloads.sf.net/p

Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1

2012-09-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +, Bart Martens wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> > >&g

Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1

2012-09-07 Thread Thomas Leonard
the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a minimal system (with Python). Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonardhttp://0install.net/ GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA

Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1

2012-09-02 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Sep 2, 2012 4:42 PM, "Bart Martens" wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector. > http://0install.net/install-source.html > http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2 > > Regards, > > Bart Martens Hi

Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package

2012-08-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
bian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_1.11-1.dsc More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net. Regards, T. Leonard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@

New sponsor required

2007-11-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
ted I ask here for a new sponsor. Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Prompt to install missing software?

2007-05-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
re them somewhere (ideally where all users can share them, but without requiring users to trust each other), - Check for updates from time-to-time (ideally in the background). You can do this using Zero Install: http://0install.net/ -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.ne

Re: RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2007-03-08 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:26:57 +, Thomas Leonard wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroinstall-injector". [...] > For some recent articles about Zero Install, see: > > "Zero Install: An executable critique

RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2007-02-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroinstall-injector". Package name: zeroinstall-injector Version : 0.26-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard URL : http://0install.net/ License : LGPL Section : admin It bu

the one-space Homepage: [was: Re: Re: RFS: fspanel -- minimalist panel for X]

2007-01-13 Thread Leonard Norrgård
ce/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-upstream-info -- Leonard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-10-28 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:13:19 -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 11:10 +, Thomas Leonard wrote: > > ... Thanks for your explanation. ... > >> http://0install.net/matrix.html > > The one thing I found particularly interesting is: > > &

Re: RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-10-27 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:15:22 -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:39 +, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> It builds these binary packages: >> zeroinstall-injector - run programs by URL > > This probably isn't related to getting your package in Debian,

RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-10-26 Thread Thomas Leonard
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroinstall-injector". * Package name: zeroinstall-injector Version : 0.24-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard * URL : http://0install.net * License : LGPL Section : admin It bu

Re: RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-09-29 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:16:49 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Thomas Leonard wrote: > >> But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and >> python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to be >> accepted? I'm not keen on using pytho

Re: RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-07-15 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:58:58 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> Thomas Leonard wrote: >> >>> But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and >>> python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to &g

Re: RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-07-01 Thread Thomas Leonard
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:15:01 +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroinstall-injector". [...] > The package is lintian clean. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net at > http://mentors.debian.net

RFS: zeroinstall-injector

2006-06-25 Thread Thomas Leonard
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeroinstall-injector". * Package name: zeroinstall-injector Version : 0.21-3 Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard * URL : http://0install.net/ * License : LGPL Section : admin It builds th

debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

2005-06-02 Thread Leonard
A wide range of software applications, drivers, and more. http://kdgz.petma6pimh7w48p.bonnyka.com I have never been hurt by anything I didn't say. We are advertis'd by our loving friends. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

First Install

2001-02-03 Thread MR STEWART JAMES LEONARD
Okay, a blatantly obvious question from a complete newbie to Linux. I have a 30Gb Hard Drive for Windows which is about 75% full. I think that partitioning it is a waste of time. If I was to install a new hard drive as a slave. Install Linux on that how would I go about formatting it? (I assum

First Install

2001-02-03 Thread MR STEWART JAMES LEONARD
Okay, a blatantly obvious question from a complete newbie to Linux. I have a 30Gb Hard Drive for Windows which is about 75% full. I think that partitioning it is a waste of time. If I was to install a new hard drive as a slave. Install Linux on that how would I go about formatting it? (I assu