On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 05:12:56AM -0200, Yves Junqueira M. Teixeira wrote:
> openMSX supports opengl output, which improves its quality considerably.
> Should I compile it with opengl support (that would make it run-depend on
> xlibmesa-gl, right?) or should I split it in two packages, an openmsx
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 05:12:56AM -0200, Yves Junqueira M. Teixeira wrote:
> openMSX supports opengl output, which improves its quality considerably.
> Should I compile it with opengl support (that would make it run-depend on
> xlibmesa-gl, right?) or should I split it in two packages, an openmsx
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:39:58AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> * Steve Kemp [Tue, Dec 09 2003, 06:21:02PM]:
> > 3. Building on my machine to produce a binary x86 module, and
> >making the binary package Depends: upon kernel-image-2.4.21-386
>
> Better don't make it Depends (use Recom
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:39:58AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> * Steve Kemp [Tue, Dec 09 2003, 06:21:02PM]:
> > 3. Building on my machine to produce a binary x86 module, and
> >making the binary package Depends: upon kernel-image-2.4.21-386
>
> Better don't make it Depends (use Recom
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Make sure you have installed the build-essential meta-package, it will
> download things the package maintainer has assumed you have.
> then,
> dpkg-source -x program.dsc
> cd program-1.2.3
(All correct, "apt-get source" was covered el
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> I've modified the postinst.ex file, but my commands aren't being
> executed. And the Debian New Maintainers' Guide says I shouldn't do this
> (add to maintainer scripts) yet. So that tells me I should be putting my
> configuration co
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Make sure you have installed the build-essential meta-package, it will
> download things the package maintainer has assumed you have.
> then,
> dpkg-source -x program.dsc
> cd program-1.2.3
(All correct, "apt-get source" was covered el
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> I've modified the postinst.ex file, but my commands aren't being
> executed. And the Debian New Maintainers' Guide says I shouldn't do this
> (add to maintainer scripts) yet. So that tells me I should be putting my
> configuration co
I'm seeking a sponsor for my xmms-null[1] package.
Description: null output plugin for XMMS
XMMS output plugin which simply throws the signal away. Useful for
testing and benchmarking. Also useful for nullifying the output
when using a DSP plugin for broadcasting, or if you don't have a
soun
I'm seeking a sponsor for my xmms-null[1] package.
Description: null output plugin for XMMS
XMMS output plugin which simply throws the signal away. Useful for
testing and benchmarking. Also useful for nullifying the output
when using a DSP plugin for broadcasting, or if you don't have a
soun
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A way to compile unstable on a stable systems is like this:
>
> Run debootstrap on an unstable system,
> make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
> unpack the tarball there and chroot into it.
Unfortunately, unless Dre
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A way to compile unstable on a stable systems is like this:
>
> Run debootstrap on an unstable system,
> make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
> unpack the tarball there and chroot into it.
Unfortunately, unless Dre
On Thursday 15 May 2003 02:16 pm, Jaime Robles wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I have a problem with one of the package i started to package a month or so
> ago.
>
> The problem is that the software i am packaging needs an old version of
> another package.
> Well, the software doesn't really need it so it
On Saturday 10 May 2003 05:43 am, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> It needs to be able to run cdrecord / mkisofs / growisofs / ... and access
> the devices with the unprivileged user it runs as.
> Your approach would help if the upstream did not check the permissions to
> ensure they are SUID root, mode
(I got the list address wrong the first time. This was actually sent back to
Cristiano.)
On Sunday 04 May 2003 05:34 pm, Cristiano De Michele wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Cristiano De Michele and very recently I got involved
> in OpenMosix(OM: http://www.openmosix.org)
> project (Sourceforge ID=demichel).
On Tuesday 29 April 2003 03:03 pm, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> 100% OT-ness here, but for some reason, I always feel the need to tell
> the robot "Thanks" instead of using one of the other non-thankful
> end tags. Is there anyone else like this, or am I just really screwed
> up, feeling thankful towards
16 matches
Mail list logo
