Bug#852148: RFS: zodb/1:3.10.7-2

2017-01-21 Thread Julien Muchembled
back to 'python'. As clarified upstream: « ZODB doesn't depend on Zope in any way and is used in many projects that have nothing to do with Zope. » This also fixes an override disparity. * d/copyright: update Copyright: year. * d/watch: fix by refreshing it from

Bug#852136: RFS: python-btrees/4.3.1-1 [ITP]

2017-01-21 Thread Julien Muchembled
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fssync" * Package name: fssync Version : 1.6-1 Upstream Author : Julien Muchembled * URL : http://jmuchemb.eu/fssync.git * License : GPL-3.0

Bug#847609: RFS: python-btrees/4.3.1-1 [ITP]

2016-12-09 Thread Julien Muchembled
ool/main/p/python-btrees/python-btrees_4.3.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: python-btrees (4.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #842874). Regards, Julien Muchembled

Bug#847608: RFS: zodbpickle/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

2016-12-09 Thread Julien Muchembled
.6.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: zodbpickle (0.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #842870). Regards, Julien Muchembled

Bug#847607: RFS: zconfig/3.1.0-1

2016-12-09 Thread Julien Muchembled
bian/rules: remove the use of pydeb, build with python2 only. * debian/tests: switch to zope.testrunner. * debian/source/options: ignore .egg-info directory. [ Julien Muchembled ] * New upstream release 3.1.0 + d/copyright: update Copyright: year + d/docs: remove NEWS.txt (it was

Purge of replaced packages

2015-12-24 Thread Julien Muchembled
Hello, I have an issue with the renaming of a binary package A -> B that we use internally (actually, it's another flavour of the same software). In B, I added the following deps: Provides: A Conflicts: A Replaces: A 'apt-get install B' removes A, but the issue is that A's postrm is still the

Re: tuxonice-userui: can architecture be changed to linux-any ?

2015-01-02 Thread Julien Muchembled
Le 01/02/15 05:02, Paul Wise a écrit : > The TuxOnIce Linux kernel patch was removed from Debian after lenny, > why is tuxonice-userui still in Debian? If tuxonice-userui doesn't > work without a TuxOnIce-patched version of the Linux kernel, then > tuxonice-userui should either be moved to contrib

tuxonice-userui: can architecture be changed to linux-any ?

2015-01-01 Thread Julien Muchembled
Hello, tuxonice-userui is currently packaged for: i386 ia64 powerpc ppc64 amd64 When I saw someone was using TuxOnIce on ARM[1], I wondered if the architecture could be changed to linux-any and I prepared a patch[2] However, my sponsor disagrees because such change should only be done after