Hi Hugh,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:43:01 +, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * debian/control:
> - Mark libxft-dev Multi-Arch: same (Closes: #884176).
>
IMO this is nothing that warrants a NMU, or an upload on its own.
Cheers,
Julie
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 16:57:18 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> >> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
> >> unrelated packages. As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
> >> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new relea
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 15:11:34 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
> > >> Version : 0.12.0-1
> > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team
> > > reject.
> > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jc
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 19:45:40 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
> redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
> CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
>
> I know that qi
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 23:51:51 +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> On 30/05/12 20:05, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What
> > exactly is the problem with it?
>
> Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the f
tag 675167 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:58:07 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from unstable, testing, stable and oldstable.
>
> The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is
> t
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 02:34:51 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> As far as I can see, sitplus is the only package involved in other
> transitions. Once the opencv transition is over, am I ok so look for a
> sponsor to review and upload my package to unstable?
>
Feel free to go ahead now.
Cheer
Hi Vedran,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:18:52 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote:
> On 12.01.2012 11:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>
> >> Hey, since you're DD, and I am not, would you be so kind and sponsor the
> >> upload?
> >
> > I am and I would be willing. Could you please provide a package al
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the
> following changelog:
>
this change to debian/rules looks weird:
- $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
+ $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:08:17 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure
> of what happens next. It seems common for packages to be uploaded to
> experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other
> maintainers upda
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> >
> >> Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please don't change the
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> >Please don't change the -dev package name.
>
> All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends on
> libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with l
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:02:57 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
>
> AFAICT the primary ABI change between these versions is that upstream
> has depreciated longs and replaced with ints in an effort to
> standardise lengths across platforms.
>
> Assuming updating the Build-depends fi
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:12:18 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Felix Geyer (17/01/2011):
> > I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself.
> > Attaching it now.
>
> Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the
> first place, too.
>
Unblocked.
Cheers
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 23:40:43 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
> I've upload a new version to Debian Mentors without the LDFLAGS change
> and CCed the bug.
>
Well you've still not sent a patch to the bug, afaict.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:19:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:08:13 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of the package "hugs98".
> >
> > The upload would fix this RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/608220
>
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 15:19:40 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> I'm writing to both X Strike Force and Mentors as my previous questions
> to X strike force [1] did not get any response I'm guessing X Strike
> Force is too bust with the release and bugs in other packages to mentor
> a newb
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 13:00:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
> > The respective updated dsc file can be found at:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info_20100824-1.d
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:50:53 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> henceforth I am attaching the diff from the present version in
> sid/squeeze for your kind review
>
Looks ok for a freeze exception. Please let -release know when the
package is accepted in the archive.
Cheers,
Julien
signatur
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:05:36 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> On Friday 21 May 2010 04:08:53 Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > You're calling dh_prep in debian/rules clean, this is wrong, should be
> > replaced by dh_clean. dh_prep is used in the install target before
>
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:54:45 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> There is a strange file debian/xserver-xorg-video-qxl.debhelper.log in
> generated package xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.12-1.debian.tar.gz, shoud I
> remove it?
>
You're calling dh_prep in debian/rules clean, this is wrong, should be
rep
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 23:19:20 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> I've upload a new version xserver-xorg-video-qxl to mentor, it can be get
> from
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/xserver-
> xorg-video-qxl_0.0.12-2.dsc
>
> its git repository is
>
> git://git.d
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you
> _must_ satisfy Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep:
>
And policy is clearly not followed by any actual practice on this point.
So that's as much a
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 19:01:41 +0200, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> Hi, I was trying to attend a reported bug (#521918) of a recently uploaded
> package 'eprover', but unfortunately I didn't know what to do about it. I've
> already asked on debian-mentors, but nobody replied.
>
> The problem is that if
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 00:19:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What I meant by "don't work" is that, as you mention, these two options
> are no-ops.
>
> According to the update-fonts-dir(1) man page, these options should not
> be no-ops:
> ===
> update-fonts-dir creates a fonts.di
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:37:12 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you. I can write a proposed addition to the Policy Manual for
> TrueType fonts after I'm done with the current package unless someone
> else wants to do it. The "update-fonts-dir" utility currently only
> handles fonts in t
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 08:50:57 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It will always fail, because the user running the script (root) won't
> > normally have access to the X server.
>
> See, I thought that too, and then I tri
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 22:13:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > 3) Even if "mkfontdir" were invoked directly or if it's okay to give
> > "update-fonts-dir" an absolute path (in which case its man page needs to
> > be updated and the warning removed), isn't it also ad
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 06:02:35 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Also, it is a bit frustrating that unless digging in the logs, it is not
> possible to know that the operation failed. If the problem is more the
> configuration of the BTS, could at least DEBEMAIL be used to deliver an
> error messag
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 22:38:56 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
> version of the g
[I'm not subscribed to -mentors]
On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at 20:10:41 +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> Hmm, I have something crap to ask...
>
> As you may have noticed, wxwidget 2.8 is not available in Debian.
> However Mathias Klose maintain it in Ubuntu...
>
> Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ub
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 17:09:45 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
>
> (CC: to d-mentors : I need some help here)
>
>
> Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > I think in conclusion I would prefer t-p-u for this.
>
> I tried it ;
> I uploaded a package (using dput) ;
> the first line in debian/changelo
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 14:02:03 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I see no problem with autobuilders and virtual build-dependencies since
> they're supposed to be configured with just unstable repositories.
Actually, I think autobuilders also have an apt source for the incoming
directory on ftp
33 matches
Mail list logo
