the
maintainer about it.
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos de Leyenda || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://debian.org
http://sindominio.net GnuPG public informat
to the
maintainer about it.
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos de Leyenda || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://debian.org
http://sindominio.net GnuPG public informat
> PGP block.
I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt then:
> [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
and `this part' was empty. It happens with all his mails. I have to save the
message to a file and page it.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || R
> PGP block.
I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt then:
> [-- application/pgp is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
and `this part' was empty. It happens with all his mails. I have to save the
message to a file and page it.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || R
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:12:02PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> Bugs are resolved. This is wrong !!!
> JM> The maintainer should aprove the bugfixes and close the bugs manually.
> I know, but why the BTS close these nugs ?
It doesn't, it only sets severity to
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:12:02PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> Bugs are resolved. This is wrong !!!
> JM> The maintainer should aprove the bugfixes and close the bugs manually.
> I know, but why the BTS close these nugs ?
It doesn't, it only sets severity
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 07:34:02PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> JM> dinstall 'fixes' NMU closed bugs.
> JM> Is that the case?
> Bugs are resolved. This is wrong !!!
The maintainer should aprove the bugfixes and close the bugs manually.
--
Jordi Mallach
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I did a gnome-core NMU (1.2.0-0.1) and all bugs I've fixed are not fixed in
> the BTS.
dinstall 'fixes' NMU closed bugs.
Is that the case?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Free
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 07:34:02PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> JM> dinstall 'fixes' NMU closed bugs.
> JM> Is that the case?
> Bugs are resolved. This is wrong !!!
The maintainer should aprove the bugfixes and close the bugs manually.
--
Jordi Mallach
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> I did a gnome-core NMU (1.2.0-0.1) and all bugs I've fixed are not fixed in
> the BTS.
dinstall 'fixes' NMU closed bugs.
Is that the case?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering F
r: field?
Send the logs of dpkg-buildpackage to see what happened.
Jordi
PS: Thank you for updating AS, it's a shame potato shipped with 1.6 :|
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
r: field?
Send the logs of dpkg-buildpackage to see what happened.
Jordi
PS: Thank you for updating AS, it's a shame potato shipped with 1.6 :|
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:03:52PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Sawfish is not experimental. It's only unstable when upgrade.
Then, tell admins to close Sawfish before upgrading the package.
It's not that terrible, is it?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:03:52PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Sawfish is not experimental. It's only unstable when upgrade.
Then, tell admins to close Sawfish before upgrading the package.
It's not that terrible, is it?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||
e was installed in the diff because it got excluded from the
tarball by accident. I guess you should install the original in the tarball.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos de L
e manpage was installed in the diff because it got excluded from the
tarball by accident. I guess you should install the original in the tarball.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos d
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 11:44:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The search engine on the lists page has been broken for quite some time.
Only on certain searches or whatever. I have used it regularly for a lot of
time now.
I think it was fixed by doogie or whoever was it.
--
Jordi Mallach Pé
k, you get your Soundblaster detected but you have no compiled module in
your kernel. What next?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
ka Oskuro in RL-MUD || [EMAIL PROTECTED]|| Using Debian GNU/Linux
http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information:
tely for RedHat Linux, but now it is available
> for Debian GNU/Linux, too.
I guess you can give more information in the description. Do you need to
have modules for all sound devices for this to work?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
ka Oskuro in R
aptable. So I copied the CDs on a
debian/dist/{m,c,n-f,n-u} tree and I guess I only need to run
dpkg-scanpackages on each directory to generate the Packages files. The
problem is I don't know which is the overrides file in the CDs. Is it
necessary?
An example would be the best help.
--
J
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 01:34:25PM +0100, Bart Schuller wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 01:23:15PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > > The other day I was wondering why there aren't any Mp3 encoders in the
> > > distribution. Is the
Hello!,
The other day I was wondering why there aren't any Mp3 encoders in the
distribution. Is there any law that prevents us from including them?
If there isn't, I think I will try to package one, BladeEnc for example.
Somebody in another list told me there were law issues with these programs,
22 matches
Mail list logo
