Re: understand dpatch

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:01 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 18:59 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote: > > To get working dpatches I recommend using the 'dpatch-edit-patch' > > command. > > Great tool! > But tell me: > I had a look at the man page, but I did not see how to g

Re: patches application

On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 01:02 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:09 -0600, John Lightsey wrote: > > 1) You should have "unpatch" added to "clean". Look at the way it's > > done in /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/rules/rules

Re: patches application

On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 19:55 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > I have a problem on it: > The patch located in 'debian/patches' is not applied. > What could I do to diagnosys the reason the patch is not applied? You need to change debian/rules in a few places. 1) You should have "unpatch" ad

RFS: four xmms visualization plugins

ere: http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-goom.tar.gz http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-synaesthesia.tar.gz http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-jess.tar.gz http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-bumpscope.tar.gz John Lightsey

RFS: four xmms visualization plugins

ere: http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-goom.tar.gz http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-synaesthesia.tar.gz http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-jess.tar.gz http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-bumpscope.tar.gz John Lightsey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Need a mentor with a !x86 machine

On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote: ... >Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any >architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on >less mature ports this can cause trouble. > >As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them

Re: Need a mentor with a !x86 machine

On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote: ... >Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any >architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on >less mature ports this can cause trouble. > >As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them

Need a mentor with a !x86 machine

age I'd be very gratefull. http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-goom.tar.gz All of the necessary files are included. If it gives you any errors during the build process please send me a copy of the build log. Thanks John Lightsey

Need a mentor with a !x86 machine

age I'd be very gratefull. http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-goom.tar.gz All of the necessary files are included. If it gives you any errors during the build process please send me a copy of the build log. Thanks John Lightsey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of &q

Re: Sponsor for xmms-bumpscope and xmms-synaesthesia

was missing. Could you give the new version I've put together a try and let me see the build log if you still get this error? It's at the same URL. Thanks for looking the packages over. > > HTH, John Lightsey

Re: Sponsor for xmms-bumpscope and xmms-synaesthesia

was missing. Could you give the new version I've put together a try and let me see the build log if you still get this error? It's at the same URL. Thanks for looking the packages over. > > HTH, John Lightsey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sponsor for xmms-bumpscope and xmms-synaesthesia

ating field of fog and glowing lines. John Lightsey

Sponsor for xmms-bumpscope and xmms-synaesthesia

ating field of fog and glowing lines. John Lightsey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: copyright guidance

On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:52 am, Terry Hancock wrote: > On Wednesday 10 September 2003 01:01 am, John Lightsey wrote: > > The problem with this package (commercial music, sounds, graphics and > > levels used without any license) isn't something I'd picture a

Re: copyright guidance

On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:52 am, Terry Hancock wrote: > On Wednesday 10 September 2003 01:01 am, John Lightsey wrote: > > The problem with this package (commercial music, sounds, graphics and > > levels used without any license) isn't something I'd picture a

Re: copyright guidance

On Tuesday 09 September 2003 11:34 pm, Matthew Palmer wrote: > No. We don't hide problems. If you expect help, expect it to be given in > public fora. Section 2.3 is a little broad for us to be able to guess what > the problem is and give specific advice. To be honest, I wasn't trying to hide t

Re: copyright guidance

On Tuesday 09 September 2003 11:34 pm, Matthew Palmer wrote: > No. We don't hide problems. If you expect help, expect it to be given in > public fora. Section 2.3 is a little broad for us to be able to guess what > the problem is and give specific advice. To be honest, I wasn't trying to hide t

copyright guidance

#x27;t screw things up by doing nothing. John Lightsey

copyright guidance

#x27;t screw things up by doing nothing. John Lightsey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reportbug and BTS

have a page that already does something like this? (A searchable index of changelogs for instance?) Thanks in advance John Lightsey

Kleandisk

not take over a package with a dead upstream as my first package. TIA John Lightsey

Kleandisk

not take over a package with a dead upstream as my first package. TIA John Lightsey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]