Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
I strongly recommend that you follow the "0.99+1.0beta4-1" scheme that
was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and
proven. In summary, the format is
[last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please
use it, starting with you
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
I strongly recommend that you follow the "0.99+1.0beta4-1" scheme that
was suggested. Yes it's long, but it's also correct, flexible, and
proven. In summary, the format is
[last_stable_version]+[experimental_version]-[package_version]. Please
use it, starting with your
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the
1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a
0.99-1+1.0-beta4
but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages
atm had a q&dirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the
1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a
0.99-1+1.0-beta4
but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages
atm had a q&dirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to
Hello,
Not being much of a buildd expert, I'm wondering what is keeping my
xmlsec1 package from entering testing. There was a problem with the
s390 build attempted Feb 05: "libgnutls10-dev missing". However, I see
that the s390 binary of libgnutls10-dev has been available since Feb 10.
Wil
Hello,
Not being much of a buildd expert, I'm wondering what is keeping my
xmlsec1 package from entering testing. There was a problem with the
s390 build attempted Feb 05: "libgnutls10-dev missing". However, I see
that the s390 binary of libgnutls10-dev has been available since Feb 10.
Will
The bug query http://bugs.debian.org/223539 has been returning an error
for a week now, causing my bug mining script to fail. Anyone know
what's going on?
-John
--
http:// if ile.o g/
The bug query http://bugs.debian.org/223539 has been returning an error
for a week now, causing my bug mining script to fail. Anyone know
what's going on?
-John
--
http:// if ile.o g/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
My sponsor for the xmlsec1 packages, Wesley Terpstra, has been missing
in action for some time now. I'm looking for someone to make an upload
of xmlsec1 1.1.1-2 from this location:
http://memebeam.org/john/tests/xmlsec1/sid/
The changes are minor-- just some things my application manager
My sponsor for the xmlsec1 packages, Wesley Terpstra, has been missing
in action for some time now. I'm looking for someone to make an upload
of xmlsec1 1.1.1-2 from this location:
http://memebeam.org/john/tests/xmlsec1/sid/
The changes are minor-- just some things my application manager h
Hello,
My automated report of neglected RC bugs has a new URL and is now
updated daily.
http://memebeam.org/john/debian/reports/neglected-bugs
-John
--
http:// if ile.o g/
Hello,
My automated report of neglected RC bugs has a new URL and is now
updated daily.
http://memebeam.org/john/debian/reports/neglected-bugs
-John
--
http:// if ile.o g/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:01:03PM -0600, John Belmonte wrote:
I've put together a list of neglected RC bugs:
http://memebeam.org/john/tests/bug-mining/neglected-bugs.html
These are RC bugs older than 2 weeks that have no follow-ups. I find
that I'm able
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Two, I find it very encouraging to see that there are so few "neglected"
bugs. A few of these bugs stem from known issues like the ruby 1.6->1.8
transition; i. e., the lack of follow-ups on a particular bug is
misleading, because it's mostly there as a reminder or to bl
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:01:03PM -0600, John Belmonte wrote:
I've put together a list of neglected RC bugs:
http://memebeam.org/john/tests/bug-mining/neglected-bugs.html
These are RC bugs older than 2 weeks that have no follow-ups. I find
that I'm able
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
Two, I find it very encouraging to see that there are so few "neglected"
bugs. A few of these bugs stem from known issues like the ruby 1.6->1.8
transition; i. e., the lack of follow-ups on a particular bug is
misleading, because it's mostly there as a reminder or to bloc
Hello,
I've put together a list of neglected RC bugs:
http://memebeam.org/john/tests/bug-mining/neglected-bugs.html
These are RC bugs older than 2 weeks that have no follow-ups. I find
that I'm able to be the most helpful with these types of bugs, even
without having Developer status. O
Hello,
I've put together a list of neglected RC bugs:
http://memebeam.org/john/tests/bug-mining/neglected-bugs.html
These are RC bugs older than 2 weeks that have no follow-ups. I find
that I'm able to be the most helpful with these types of bugs, even
without having Developer status. Of
Hello,
Is there some resource that lets me find "overlooked" bugs-- for
example, RC bugs older than 2 weeks and having no follow-up messages?
If not, what is the best way to generate such a list on my own?
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if le.o /
Hello,
Is there some resource that lets me find "overlooked" bugs-- for
example, RC bugs older than 2 weeks and having no follow-up messages?
If not, what is the best way to generate such a list on my own?
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if le.o /
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
The point with Jarno's script, is that it will be very easy for us to
kick out future viruses, as long as we get md5sums for them.
This is wishful thinking. Don't you think its going to become common
for a virus to make a random insignificant change to its payl
Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
The point with Jarno's script, is that it will be very easy for us to
kick out future viruses, as long as we get md5sums for them.
This is wishful thinking. Don't you think its going to become common
for a virus to make a random insignificant change to its payload
I'm wondering if the control mailserver can tolerate a PGP/MIME message.
The case is when you want to combine control commands and a bug
follow-up, and have your message signed.
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if l .o /
I'm wondering if the control mailserver can tolerate a PGP/MIME message.
The case is when you want to combine control commands and a bug
follow-up, and have your message signed.
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if l .o /
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
josX wrote:
I wrote a program, and i would like to have it in debian format,
and if people like it in the debian releases. If packaging isn't
too difficult i would have no problems with debianizing it, but
it is not my first interest (packaging/installing etc). OTOH, maybe
it is fun to do, i've n
josX wrote:
I wrote a program, and i would like to have it in debian format,
and if people like it in the debian releases. If packaging isn't
too difficult i would have no problems with debianizing it, but
it is not my first interest (packaging/installing etc). OTOH, maybe
it is fun to do, i've no
Michael Banck wrote:
Seriously, with a nice net connection you can setup another (not
compressed) chroot with debootstrap in a matter of minutes for testing
stuff.
One thing I like about pbuilder is that changes you make while in the shell are
effectively discarded upon exit. With the persist
Brett Cundal wrote:
pbuilder has a login feature that allows me to get a shell inside the
chroot, but I'm not sure how to get my package in there. I can copy it
in from outside, but I belive the location of the chroot changes every
time. It looks like all the hooks get called inside the chroot, s
Michael Banck wrote:
Seriously, with a nice net connection you can setup another (not
compressed) chroot with debootstrap in a matter of minutes for testing
stuff.
One thing I like about pbuilder is that changes you make while in the shell are
effectively discarded upon exit. With the persistent
Brett Cundal wrote:
pbuilder has a login feature that allows me to get a shell inside the
chroot, but I'm not sure how to get my package in there. I can copy it
in from outside, but I belive the location of the chroot changes every
time. It looks like all the hooks get called inside the chroot, so
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
good reason not to do this?
I think others have presented go
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'm the Debian maintainer for pksd, an OpenPGP keyserver. I've been
asked by upstream if I want to maintain the debian/ directory in the
project's CVS. The RPM .spec file is already done this way. Is there any
good reason not to do this?
I think others have presented goo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd like to take another shot at getting libxmlsec into Debian (bug
#152605). I'm looking for someone to sponsor the following:
~http://memebeam.org/john/tests/libxmlsec/woody/libxmlsec_0.0.9-1.dsc
This time no dependent package NMU's a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd like to take another shot at getting libxmlsec into Debian (bug
#152605). I'm looking for someone to sponsor the following:
~http://memebeam.org/john/tests/libxmlsec/woody/libxmlsec_0.0.9-1.dsc
This time no dependent package NMU's ar
Colin Walters wrote:
Incidentally (and this is more a question for upstream, but maybe you
know), how hard would it be to make this library work with GNUTLS? See,
I might want to use it with a GPL'd application, and of course since
libxmlsec links with OpenSSL this won't work.
Aleksey Sanin w
Colin Walters wrote:
> Incidentally (and this is more a question for upstream, but maybe you
> know), how hard would it be to make this library work with GNUTLS? See,
> I might want to use it with a GPL'd application, and of course since
> libxmlsec links with OpenSSL this won't work.
Aleksey S
Colin Walters wrote:
Hm. Well, maybe you could try again...according to our developer
tracker he was last seen on -devel-changes on Aug 5, so maybe he just
missed your mail for some reason.
OK, I'll make another attempt.
How do you plan to get your key signed for applying to the project?
L
Ari Pollak wrote:
What's wrong with linking with OpenSSL?
It appears that OpenSSL is available under two licenses, both with
BSD-style advertising clauses that are incompatible with the GPL.
-John
--
http:// i . /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Colin Walters wrote:
|
| I am looking over your packages now.
Thanks, I appreciate it.
|>The required version of libxslt1 wasn't available (bug #154730), so I've
|>also prepared a libxslt NMU.
|
| Hm, the last maintainer upload was almost a year ago
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've packaged libxmlsec (bug #152605), a library for performing
signature and encryption operations on XML, and am looking for a sponsor.
~http://memebeam.org/john/tests/libxmlsec/
The required version of libxslt1 wasn't available (bug #
Jeff Bailey wrote:
Hi, I'm new to this also but...
E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0,
libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1)
The generate mailutils.pop3d-substvars has:
The error is for mailutils-imap4d, but you are looking at the config for
mailutils.pop3d?
Wha
Jeff Bailey wrote:
Hi, I'm new to this also but...
> E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0
>(= 20020713-1)
>
> The generate mailutils.pop3d-substvars has:
The error is for mailutils-imap4d, but you are looking at the config for
mailutils.pop3d?
42 matches
Mail list logo
