I have resolved the build twice issue. The package on mentors has been
updated.
-- john
Thanks Phil,
I have uploaded a new version of midiminder to mentors with a patch to fix
the lintian warning about the manpage. Upstream will include this fix in
their next release.
-- john
unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1091826)
Regards,
--
John Horigan
riend to
revise that translation!
If I make a new upstream release (v7.21), should I simply rename
this bug appropriately, or should I close it and open a new one with
a reference to this bug?
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group │
are able to spot the things I
highlighted above (or others). But I'm afraid that, as a Debian
sysadmin, I wouldn't want to support this for users or have it installed
on my system for real use. I suspect that the ftpmasters wouldn't
accept it into the distribution, and that may be why there hasn't been a
sponsor.
If you would like to package up something else for Debian, I'd be happy
to look at it for you though!
Regards,
- John
r", a
simple game of interstellar trading:
Package name:trader
Version: 7.20-3
Upstream author: John Zaitseff -- that's me!
URL: https://www.zap.org.au/projects/trader/
License: GPL3+
Vcs: https://git.zap.org.au/git/trader.git -b with-d
t the overall GPL-3+ licence.
Files:
lib/obsolete-strings.c
lib/xopen-source.h
Copyright: 2018-2024, John Zaitseff
License: GPL-3+
> embedded code copies:
> - gnulib is packaged for Debian, any reason why you don't use the
> packaged version?
The upstream release
inal link
now points to the updated package:
dget -x
https://ftp.zap.org.au/pub/debian/dists/zapgroup-sid/main/source/trader_7.20-1.dsc
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group │ Z │ GnuPG: 0x0D254111C4EE569B
Australia Inc. ╰───╯ https://www.zap.org.au/~john/
d for v7.19 -- should I just add them as part of the
7.20-1 changelog entry?
John
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group │ Z │ GnuPG: 0x0D254111C4EE569B
Australia Inc. ╰───╯ https://www.zap.org.au/~john/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "trader", a simple
game of interstellar trading:
Package name:trader
Version: 7.20-1
Upstream author: John Zaitseff -- that's me!
URL:
On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 12:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-08-13 at 11:51 +0000, John Scott wrote:
>
> > Because carl9170 is largely under the GPL and we're obligated to distribute complete sources for our binaries, I've set Static-Built- Using on both gcc (because
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Dear all,
I have uploaded a new version of carl9170fw to mentors.debian.net that
represents my very best work. Please review it carefully. Building it requires
the just-uploaded libnewlib-sh-elf-dev version 3.3.0+8. I tend to ramble and
I've already written at great
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control: block 1026335 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 7
* License : various
*
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
I've discovered an issue with how the Built-Using fields are generated.
Specifically, because gcc-sh-elf does not set a Built-Using field for Newlib,
and because of the way the libnewlib-sh-elf-dev binary package is currently
versioned, there is no way to precisely tel
Control: retitle -1 RFS: carl9170fw [ITP] -- firmware for AR9170 USB wireless
adapters
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "carl9170fw":
* Package name : carl9170fw
Version : 1.9.9-450-gad1c721-1
Upstream contact : linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 6
* License : many, but primarily GPL 3+ for GCC and permissive
licenses for Newlib
* Vcs :
https:
shouldn't be any problems now.
Thank you,
John
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi John!
On 12/19/22 02:08, John Scott wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binutils-sh-elf":
* Package name
Hi John!
On 12/18/22 18:06, John Scott wrote:
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 08:49 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I assume you're missing libreadline-dev from BuildDepends.
You are, of course, absolutely right. I forgot to build in a clean
environment. This has been fixed in a new uplo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binutils-sh-elf":
* Package name : binutils-sh-elf
Version : 2 (this is a native so
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 994625 by -1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org b...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "carl9170fw":
* Package name : carl9170fw
Version : 1.9.9-427-gecb68a7-1
Upstream
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 08:49 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I assume you're missing libreadline-dev from BuildDepends.
You are, of course, absolutely right. I forgot to build in a clean
environment. This has been fixed in a new upload to mentors.debian.net
and a build in
Hello John!
On 12/18/22 08:17, John Scott wrote:
Control: owner -1 glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 08:09 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I can sponsor this upload.
Thanks so much! Please go ahead whenever you're ready.
The package does not build in a
Control: owner -1 glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 08:09 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I can sponsor this upload.
Thanks so much! Please go ahead whenever you're ready.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello John!
On 12/18/22 06:22, John Scott wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors and fellow Electronics Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-s
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors and fellow Electronics Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version
erent packaging standards each distro has!
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group │ Z │ GnuPG: 0x0D254111C4EE569B
Australia Inc. ╰───╯ https://www.zap.org.au/~john/
"urgency=medium"
in debian/changelog. My mistake.
I can add the entry for 7.16-3.1 into my repos. Should I then just
reissue 7.18-1 (the current version) or create 7.18-2?
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group │ Z │ GnuPG:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "trader", a simple
game of interstellar trading:
Package name:trader
Version: 7.18-1
Upstream author: John Zaitseff -- that's me!
URL:
Thanks for taking a look, Bastian. I believe the changes are
satisfactory now, except that after close inspection I found that those
files specified as being covered by the BSD-3-Clause license are still
covered by it. Please me know if I'm misunderstanding something.
signature.asc
Description:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-ath9k-htc-firmware":
* Package name : open-ath9k-htc-firmware
Version : 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : ath9k_h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 4
* License : various
* Vcs :
https://salsa.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear mentors and other interested parties,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your very detailed review of carl9170fw. I'm still making my
changes to the package and will give you a poke and remove the moreinfo
tag once I have an upload ready for re-review.
> I don't think udebs are needed for firmware packages, none of the ot
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 16:54 +0100, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> (correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that using Apache-2.0 libraries in
> GPL
> software is not allowed).
It depends on the version of the GPL at play. If it's GPL 3.0 (or
later), then Apache 2.0 is usually regarded as fully compatib
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors and Kernel Team,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "carl9170fw":
* Package name : carl9170fw
Version : 1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1
Upstream Author : linux-wirel...@vger.ke
2 | uniq | wc -
l
and these are the same ones as for the first upload with GCC 11.2.0-12.
The autopkgtests are numerous and still passing and I don't anticipate
any issues with this building on all architectures as it has before.
Thanks,
John
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi!
On 10/15/21 12:37, John Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> So, do you want me to upload newlib or do you want Tobias to do it?
> I think it would be more appropriate if you would. Just be sure to do
> it to a delayed queue f
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, do you want me to upload newlib or do you want Tobias to do it?
I think it would be more appropriate if you would. Just be sure to do
it to a delayed queue for a minimum of two weeks, and send a mail to
99655
Hi John!
On 10/15/21 12:21, John Scott wrote:
> I've sent a merge request, and in fact did so a long time ago before my
> first NMU, but since the maintainers have been unresponsive it hasn't
> gotten merged. The Git repo is in collaborative maintenance, but since
> I'
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 12:07 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> What about the Salsa repository? Is it going to be updated?
I've sent a merge request, and in fact did so a long time ago before my
first NMU, but since the maintainers have been unresponsive it hasn't
gotten me
On 10/15/21 12:00, John Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 11:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Are you planning to adopt the package?
>
> Yes, I'm intending to salvage it and become the maintainer (the ITS is
> #996432). I think I'll keep it under the
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 11:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Are you planning to adopt the package?
Yes, I'm intending to salvage it and become the maintainer (the ITS is
#996432). I think I'll keep it under the umbrella of the Electronics
Team.
signature.asc
Descripti
Hi John!
On 10/15/21 11:50, John Scott wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlib":
>
> * Package name: newlib
>Version : 3.3.0-1.2
>Upstream Author : various Newlib contributors
> * URL : https://sourcew
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net,
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
Control: affects -1 src:newlib
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlib":
* Package name : newlib
Version : 3.3.0-1.2
Hi,
My question is more to do with the practical ramifications of an upload
than the legal ones, so I'm directing my query here rather than debian-
legal.
I'm packaging carl9170fw (which is already present in Debian main, but
not built from source yet), and this includes a header file called
ch9.
> I have no idea how we're going to address this. I think I'll file a bug
> and see if they're willing to revert as soon as I can identify all of
> the affected packages.
I've filed a bug and marked it as a blocker of this issue, but in the
admittedly short time since I filed it Wednesday I haven't
Hi Vincent,
I'm very glad to see that you've been working on this. From an initial
skim of your package, things look very good, and I'm more pleased to
see that you've based your work off of binutils-sh-elf and the
PackagingLessCommonBinutilsTargets guide.
About the build failure Adam had, I'm af
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net, nico...@debian.org
Control: block -1 by 985563
Control: block 986778 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Versio
Control: retitle -1 RFS: open-ath9k-htc-firmware/1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
[RC] -- firmware for AR7010 and AR9271 USB wireless adapters
Thanks to the Reproducible Builds folks for notifying me, the current
package is FTBFS due to the Binutils 2.37 upload to unstable.
Fortunately my package alrea
that in my build log above, I'm using GCC 11, but I don't think
this is related to the issue at hand. If it were to turn out that GCC
11 is the culprit, this needs to be addressed anyway.
Thanks for your time.
John
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 17:07 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > * Friendly takeover back into the WebExt team.
>
> I can't find any documentation about that have been ACKed by the
> current maintainer. (CCing Jonas so that he can response/confirm, to
> put it on record that this is not an hijack…)
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:07 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> The Files-Excluded section is used by tools like uscan to strip files from the
> orig.tar. The formatted text just says that the field can extend over
> multiple
> lines, it does not mean its free text without meaning.
> TL;DR: I'm pretty s
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:38:56 + John Scott
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:52 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > I haven't encountered the maintainer previously, but believe in
> > > good faith that these changes would be welcome and that
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:52 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > I haven't encountered the maintainer previously, but believe in
> > good faith that these changes would be welcome and that the
> > LowThresholdNmu criterion are met by addressing a bug with
> > important severity. My interest in this bug,
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 20:25 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I've took a look at your package:
Awesome, thanks.
> - d/copyright:
> - The word "Comment:" went missing after the Files-Exlucded section
Hello,
I'm working on packaging gcc-sh-elf (ITP #986778) which provides not
just a cross C compiler, but also provides Newlib (the ISO C standard
library) and a simulator, which is a Wine-like wrapper that makes
running the binaries possible on a Debian machine. This seems like a
very good opportu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for Newlib:
* Package name : newlib
Version : 3.3.0-1.1
Upstream Author : Red Hat and others
* URL : https://sourceware.org/newlib/
* License : various
* Vcs
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:30:45 -0400 John Scott wrote:
> The package should be built against experimental.
I've come to realize that on the buildd's, packages from experimental
aren't pulled in unless required to satisfy the build dependencies.
Disregard this; it's not a bi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control: block 980889 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binutils-sh-elf":
* Package name : binutils-sh-elf
Version : 1 (it's a native package)
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-ath9k-htc-firmware":
* Package name : open-ath9k-htc-firmware
Version : 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : Qualcomm Atheros and contributors
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-mozext-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "privacybadger":
* Package name: privacybadger
Version : 2021.2.2-1
Upstream Author : Electronic Frontier Foundat
Hello,
I'm working on packaging binutils-sh-elf, which is a native package which only
has a debian/ directory. At build time, it extracts the tarball from binutils-
source—whatever version it happens to be—and builds it into binary packages
with the appropriate options.
For informative purposes
ource/trader_7.16-2.dsc
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group │ Z │ GnuPG: 0x0D254111C4EE569B
Sydney, Australia ╰───╯ https://www.zap.org.au/~john/
noticed
that the dev package was renamed :-( Sorry about that.
I'll update the debian/control file in my Git repo to start (give me
15 minutes), then rebuild the files on my FTP site.
Yours truly,
John Zaitseff
--
John Zaitseff ╭───╮ Email: j.zaits...@zap.org.au
The ZAP Group
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trader", a simple game of
interstellar trading:
Package name:trader
Version: 7.16
Upstream author: John Zaitseff -- that's me!
URL: https://www.zap.
On Friday, December 25, 2020 3:27:25 PM EST Tobias Winchen wrote:
> Did you try drag and drop the images e.g. to libreoffice impress? Via drag
> and
> drop I get the correct effects, but not via save. I reported this behavior
> upstream:
I had not tried that, but bizarrely it seems to not work
I can't sponsor KLatexFormula but use it and may have spotted issues.
I see this version introduces user scripts, but most of them start with
#!/usr/bin/env python
and the problem is that this doesn't explicitly refer to Python 2 or Python 3.
At this time, such a script is considered a release-cr
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 4:09:59 AM EDT Ansgar wrote:
> If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its
> implementation doesn't matter to users and probably shouldn't be part
> of a package's name
It's both a command-line utility and a library, albeit a library applications
a
On Monday, July 20, 2020 11:07:05 AM EDT François Mazen wrote:
> Is there special syntax in debian/changelog file to reopen such bugs?
> I would expect something similar to the (Closes: #123456):
> (Reopens: #123456)?
No, you can't do it in the changelog. Instead, you can send an email to
cont...
On Monday, July 13, 2020 10:50:00 AM EDT Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> Unfortunately licensecheck doesn't currently recognize
> SPDX-License-Identifier (I haven't check to see if there's a request
> filed for that).
Fortunately there are issues filed (#904518) and an author assures that support
will be ad
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 4:58:08 PM EDT Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> The beginning of the error message is:
> CMake Error at
> /usr/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/CMakeCompilerIdDetection.cmake:26 (list):
> list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.
That part of the module says
lis
> > If there really is a problem with those files I would appreciate your
> > letting me know what I missed. Otherwise I hope you can avoid the
> > repacking trouble in the future.
> Probably not, but the repacking is not trouble.
Without a good reason, you really shouldn't repack [1]. I do not u
On January 5, 2020 12:34:53 PM EST, Wookey wrote:
>On 2020-01-05 10:01 -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
>> Now, before I redo the upload (and get it stuck again), let me try to
>> understand the situation --
>>
>> The reason it was stuck might be because my key was *considered*
>> expired. The problem is,
The package is in great shape. The only challenge to getting the package in
the archive seems to be the copyright file. Coreboot's README says
> Some files are licensed under the "GPL (version 2, or any later version)",
> and some files are licensed under the "GPL, version 2". For some parts,
> wh
I'm not a DD and can't sponsor packages, but I hope my feedback can be helpful
for you.
I see Lutris bundles python-distro. This is available in Debian, so the
package should use it rather than installing a bundled copy. Debian's
Winetricks should be used also.
Since Winetricks is in contrib, d
get my key refreshed, or would I be better off starting a
new application?
Thanks,
John Scott
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
wxMaxima FTBFS's for me with
$ pdf-engine /usr/bin/xelatex not known
I see that the 19.10.0 Debian package builds now by skipping the PDF manual
when it can't be built. I think I've found the root of the problem with
Pandoc.
It turns out this is a regression that's been there for ages and fixed
ium main
But it's also quite easy to do with rsync and ssh.
---
John
It doesn't build for me on Buster, it seems this version of Pandoc doesn't
understand giving the full path to the TeX engine.
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/john/wxmaxima/wxmaxima-19.09.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
cd /home/john/wxmaxima/wxmaxima-19.09.1/obj-x86_64-linux-g
I tried to fetch the source package with dget, but it doesn't seem to like the
new key it's signed with.
$ dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wxmaxima/wxmaxima_19.09.1-1.dsc
dscverify: wxmaxima_19.09.1-1.dsc failed signature check:
gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to
Hello,
John here from SourceGlobalMedia.com - We are a reputed Digital Marketing
Agency working with variety of clients from UK, USA, France, Greece,
Finland, Germany and Spain.
We are interested in developing partnerships with companies / webmaster
such as yourself to check if you can publish
want to intervene. If that hasn't happened yet, I can take care of the
package.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 11:00 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 09:38:17AM -0800, John Horigan wrote:
> > This is what I found in the configure.ac file:
> >
> > dnl Setting up library version
> > AGG_LIB_VERSION="2:4:0"
> >
n to 0 and increment the age to 1 --> 3:0:1 (not 2:0:1 as I said
before). So the soname will be libagg3.
-- john
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 5:11 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 05:31:10PM -0800, John Horigan wrote:
> > Upstream is going to bump the version to 2.6 (s
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 08:27:24AM -0800, John Horigan wrote:
> > I maintain a static library package, libagg-dev. There is an outstanding
> > request for a shared library of libagg.
> Is building the shared lib support
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:36 AM Wookey wrote:
> On 2018-12-07 08:27 -0800, John Horigan wrote:
> > I maintain a static library package, libagg-dev. There is an outstanding
> > request for a shared library of libagg. I'm leaving the original
> libagg-dev
> > binary pa
/libfoo package pairs and it seems like I should have this:
~john$ ls -l libagg2-dev/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
total 1584
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 219072 Dec 6 23:14 libagg.so
~john$ ls -l libagg2/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/
total 216
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Dec 6 23:14 libagg.so.2 -> libagg
lloyd/yajl
Changes since the last upload:
[ Jelmer Vernooij ]
* Use secure URI in Vcs control header.
* Use secure copyright file specification URI.
[ John Stamp ]
* Bump debhelper compat to 11.
- Remove unneeded --parallel argument in debian/rules.
* Transition to automatic debu
I was building my Docker image on top of ubuntu:16.04. Switching to
debian:latest fixed this. Oops!
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:33 PM, John Allwine wrote:
> Maybe I'm using an old version that doesn't pick that up? Or I'm not
> naming it correctly? Here's the script that
i wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:36:00PM -0700, John Allwine wrote:
>> Thanks Adam! I really appreciate you taking the time to look through
>> this. I'm still unclear on how to include the .asc file in my upload.
>> The dput command takes the .changes file, which de
> Well, how else can uscan verify it?
> It's also used to verify the orig tarball once it's in the archive.
The watch file describes how to download the upstream tar ball and its
signature file. I'm not sure what to do here. Right now I do a debsign
on the .changes file and it signs the .dsc file a
suggested in the walkthrough I went
through. I can change it to unstable.
Will add the original license of CSG.js as well.
John Allwine
Owner of Allwine Designs
http://www.allwinedesigns.com
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 3:29 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 09:54:10PM
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stlcmd"
* Package name: stlcmd
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : John Allwine
* URL : https://www.github.com/AllwineDesigns/stl_cmd
* License
On 10/24/2017 08:56 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'm going to sponsor this for you.
Done.
Please fix at least these two issues in the next upload:
X: opencsg source: debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package libopencsg1-dbg
N:
N:The debian/control file includes declaration of
rsten
gets mad at me :-).
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
name due to certain third party
software. Should we really keep such kludges around forever?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
sured by Ubuntu's decision, to be honest.
I will discuss the issue with Joerg to figure out the best solution.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GP
I am taking care of this.
Thanks,
Adrian
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst
> wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sane-backends"
>
> Package name: sane-backends
> Version
nloaded the new
source version, downloaded and verified the gpg signature, and repackaged a
new orig.tar.xz file. Subsequent runs of uscan determine that local was
up-to-date but downloaded and verifies the gpg signature anyway.
What check does mentors do that my watch file is failing?
-- john
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
