Alex Vong wrote:
> Maybe overriding CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS but not LDFLAGS will solve FTBFS.
>
> For example in debian/rules,
>
> CFLAGS = '-Ofoo'
> CPPFLAGS = '-Dfoo'
> LDFLAGS += '-lfoo'
>
> override_dh_auto_configure:
> dh_auto_configure -- --enable-foo
This is wrong. You should *not* ove
Hi
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I noticed that the ftpnew gatherer for UDD is currently broken.
> (...)
> Location: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ [following]
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden
There is a related issue with deferred packages: Link "non-NEW uploads
are available
Hi
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
>> You added a +dfsg suffix. Good.
>>
>> However, lintian is complaining about the +dfsg :
>> debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version.
>
> Fixed, pushed, re-uploaded.
>
>> You should update the watch file to match your change.
>> Please also look at repacksuffix in us
Hello
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> haxe (1:3.0.0~svn6707+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Adopt as Debian Flash Team.
> + Set maintainer to Debian Flash team, add myself to uploaders.
> * Set Vcs-* fields to updated collab-maint git repo.
> * Replace jquery-latest.min.js and swfobje
On Friday 02 November 2012 17:58:08 you wrote:
> (...)
> Again, determining the "right" solution would be best to discuss on
> the redhat bug or preferably with upstream.
Ok. I did post that on redhat bugzilla.
upstream did not publish anything for years...
> Until those things happen, I am goin
>>* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of
>> overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
> I've reviewed this and it looks mostly good. However, can you explain
> why you chose ERRWIDTH=PATH_MAX+1024 vs. the redhat patch WIDTH=80?
I don't know exactly.
It
debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mcrypt/mcrypt_2.6.8-1.3.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
mcrypt (2.6.8-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of
overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
Regards,
J
Salut!
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 07:01:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of
> them !
> >>> Absolutely. Done.
> >>> I did not change the orig tarball howeve
Salut
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>>> * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of
>>> them !
>> Absolutely. Done.
>> I did not change the orig tarball however. Right?
>
> Hmmm... I'm unsure about that, since the copyright status of
Hello and thank you very much for your review!
On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
> unstable will follow the release of wheezy
It makes sense. Done.
> * I don't see the point of including session d
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eyefiserver"
Package name : eyefiserver
Version : 2.3~rc1-1
Upstream Author : Jean-Michel Vourgère
URL : https://github.com/nirgal/EyeFiServer/
License : GPL-3
Section
Try http://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
but you'll be very happy to find it when you need it.
Please sponsor me.
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel Vourgère
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ebian/pool/main/m/mdbtools/mdbtools_0.7~rc1-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel Vourgère
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
14 matches
Mail list logo
