RE: problem with hard links?

2009-06-27 Thread Jay
Ok, it turns out I had accidentally hardlinked a symlink. dpkg -i doesn't like that. I stopped doing that and now my package installs. Cool. - Jay > From: jay.kr...@cornell.edu > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Subject: problem w

problem with hard links?

2009-06-26 Thread Jay
irectly"? Aha: ppca:/tmp/tmp79HWvP/perl-5.8.8/debian# grep "ln " * rules: ln $(build)/perl-base/usr/bin/perl \ Is that like what I need to do? I don't even currently have a rules file. :( - Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o

$1K a day part-time returning calls!

2005-07-31 Thread Jay Benavides
Hello Ferdinand, Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone calls? I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for this program. Give Us A Call 888 238 3164 crania draw tore endurance guam basophilic nobody crater custodia

Re: Updates to d-mentors FAQ

2005-04-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
t who mentioned that your writing is clear and informative. When I was just getting started, this was one of the most helpful things I read. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pdf files in upstream tarball and -doc package

2005-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Viernes, 11 de Febrero de 2005 17:21, Jay Berkenbilt escribiÃ: >> That isn't to say that it is impossible to create a security hole >> through a PDF file, but it's more comparable to html in that respect >> tha

Re: pdf files in upstream tarball and -doc package

2005-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
. In other words, you could include a malicious link or put invalid PDF data that would exploit a security hole in a specific PDF viewer, but you can't actually embed malicious code. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

apt-get et lancement automatique du script

2005-02-03 Thread Jay Ar
Bonjour, j'ai construit un paquet, et tout va bien, je peux l'installer avec apt-get et tout. après installation, je peux donc lancer sur la machine la commande ma-commande, qui est en fait un script dans mon paquet. ce que je voudrais, c'est que apt-get lance lui même ce script (ma-commande) aut

Re: renaming a library package (advice and sanity check)

2005-01-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
client package. Again, this problem could happen only under a short window of time, and would only happen if someone explicitly tried to install the new package, not if someone did a dist-upgrade. I think this kind of thing happens all the time. Well, this is long, but maybe it will help som

Re: renaming a library package (advice and sanity check)

2005-01-15 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> I've read Section 5.9.3 of the developer's reference and understand it >> clearly. Is that still the best way to go? > > Not always, unfortunately. Very often, t

Re: renaming a library package (advice and sanity check)

2005-01-15 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The recent thread on names of library packages on debian-devel made me > decide that I made a mistake in naming one of my packages. > Specifically, the vips7.10 source package creates four binary > packages: libvips7.10, libvips7.1

renaming a library package (advice and sanity check)

2005-01-14 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ackages and would then request removal of the old packages by posting a bug against ftp.debian.org. Advice welcome and appreciated. Thanks. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pkg-classifier appliance

2004-12-14 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Tue 14 Dec 04, 1:59 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > also sprach vegetax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.14.1346 +0100]: > > The url for the tgz containing the source code, just 1 python file > > and a README is http://files.bighosting.net/lh13023.zip , can > > someone please chec

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 5:40 PM, David Mandelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Matt Brubeck wrote: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > > >>Instead, install what is presently /usr/games/yadex to > >>/usr/lib/yadex/... and install a one-line wrapper script to > >>/usr/games/yadex: > >> > >>#!/bin/sh -e

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 12:10 PM, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > > My first package is ALMOST lintian clean. One warning: > > > >$ lintian -i yadex_1.7.0-1_i386.deb > >W: yadex: men

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 10:05 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > also sprach Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.13.2149 +0100]: > > I'm sorry -- I'm drawing a blank. What's OP? > > >From Virtual Entity of Relevant Acrony

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 10:05 PM, Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Peter Jay Salzman wrote on 13/12/2004 21:49: > >In any event, the program starts in a terminal environment, but ultimately > >must be run in an x11 environment. > > What does it need the terminal for?

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 9:43 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > also sprach Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.13.2135 +0100]: > > But in order to yadex, you MUST have x11. For example, you cannot > > use this program in a virtual console. It

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 9:07 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > also sprach Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.13.2055 +0100]: > >?package(yadex): needs="x11" section="Games/Arcade" title="yadex" \ > >h

warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
My first package is ALMOST lintian clean. One warning: $ lintian -i yadex_1.7.0-1_i386.deb W: yadex: menu-command-not-in-package /usr/lib/menu/yadex:2 x-terminal-emulator N: N: The menu item specifies a command which is not available in the N: package. In most cases this is

Re: debian/rules error on clean rule

2004-12-12 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Sun 12 Dec 04, 4:59 PM, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Dec 12, 2004: > > > And then it gives up because of the errors. The part that I really don't > > understand is WHY the rm fails. > > Check

debian/rules error on clean rule

2004-12-12 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
Hi all, A package (yadex) isn't building, and I'm trying to figure out why. I narrowed it down to the clean rule of debian/rules. Here's the relevent portion of debian/rules (echos added by me): clean: clean-tree unpatch clean-tree: checkroot @echo "* ALPHA" rm -

Re: advice about splitting a package (libtiff-tools)

2004-11-28 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
f tiffgt.1.gz. Since Replaces will appear without Conflicts, libtiff-tools won't get removed. When it gets upgraded, tiffgt.1.gz will not be removed. Once libtiff-opengl is installed, it will no longer be possible to install an older version of libtiff-tools, but I don't consider tha

Re: advice about splitting a package (libtiff-tools)

2004-11-28 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
f tiffgt.1.gz. Since Replaces will appear without Conflicts, libtiff-tools won't get removed. When it gets upgraded, tiffgt.1.gz will not be removed. Once libtiff-opengl is installed, it will no longer be possible to install an older version of libtiff-tools, but I don't consider tha

advice about splitting a package (libtiff-tools)

2004-11-28 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
? Most people will have all those libraries on their systems anyway, and I suspect not many people running systems without X will bother with libtiff-tools. Thanks for any advice. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

advice about splitting a package (libtiff-tools)

2004-11-28 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
? Most people will have all those libraries on their systems anyway, and I suspect not many people running systems without X will bother with libtiff-tools. Thanks for any advice. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

request removal of vips7.8 and nip from mentors.debian.net

2004-09-09 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ackages because someone has agreed to sponsor them for upload into the archive, and I want to tweak the description from what's there on mentors. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

request removal of vips7.8 and nip from mentors.debian.net

2004-09-09 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ackages because someone has agreed to sponsor them for upload into the archive, and I want to tweak the description from what's there on mentors. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: RFD: take over packages

2004-08-22 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
my experience, although unresponsive at times, he is supportive and good to work with. --Jay

Re: RFD: take over packages

2004-08-22 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
my experience, although unresponsive at times, he is supportive and good to work with. --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
thick-headed about this, but this seems to be > one area where documentation is (uncharacteristically) sparse. I sent email to {mips,mipsel,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this correct? --Jay

Re: getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
t for this? Are there specific people whose email addresses I should use? Sorry if I'm being thick-headed about this, but this seems to be one area where documentation is (uncharacteristically) sparse. --Jay

Re: getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
thick-headed about this, but this seems to be > one area where documentation is (uncharacteristically) sparse. I sent email to {mips,mipsel,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this correct? --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
or this? Are there specific people whose email addresses I should use? Sorry if I'm being thick-headed about this, but this seems to be one area where documentation is (uncharacteristically) sparse. --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
mipsel, powerpc: libs/xerces24_2.4.0-2: Not-For-Us [extra:out-of-date] > > Why do you support even less archs? I'd like to know that too. I don't think it's anything I did. How would I find out? Thanks for your helpful and thorough response. --Jay

getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
n arm and upload them before the freeze? * In xerces23 and xerces24, other architectures out of date, but their buildd logs show success. Why would they be out of date if they were built successfully? What can I do to resolve this? Thanks for any clarification. -- Jay Berkenbilt &l

Re: getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
es24_2.4.0-2: Not-For-Us [extra:out-of-date] > > Why do you support even less archs? I'd like to know that too. I don't think it's anything I did. How would I find out? Thanks for your helpful and thorough response. --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

getting packages to rebuild

2004-08-08 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
n arm and upload them before the freeze? * In xerces23 and xerces24, other architectures out of date, but their buildd logs show success. Why would they be out of date if they were built successfully? What can I do to resolve this? Thanks for any clarification. -- Jay Berkenbilt &l

RFS: vips/nip: quick demo so you'll see how good it is

2004-08-05 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
s, I will ask two people who have sponsored uploads for me before, but I'm hoping someone who is interested in image manipulation software will take a look at these. I don't want to seem impatient, which is why I mention this up front. I'm only trying to act quickly because of the looming

RFS: vips and nip

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
software will take a look at these. I don't want to seem impatient, which is why I mention this up front. I'm only trying to act quickly because of the looming sarge freeze. :-) -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> If B fails to build from source, is it > > the case that manual intervention is then required to get it to retry, > > or does this happen automatically? Thanks again for any > > clarification. > > That depends on the reason of not-building. What reasons

RFS: vips and nip

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
software will take a look at these. I don't want to seem impatient, which is why I mention this up front. I'm only trying to act quickly because of the looming sarge freeze. :-) -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-03 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> If B fails to build from source, is it > > the case that manual intervention is then required to get it to retry, > > or does this happen automatically? Thanks again for any > > clarification. > > That depends on the reason of not-building. What reasons

two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-02 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
mmand-line tools in one source package that creates four binary packages (runtime, dev, doc, and tools) and then a separate graphical front end that depends on the runtime and build-depends on the dev. I'll be posting an RFS for these packages probably within the next day or so. -- Jay

two new packages, one depends upon the other

2004-08-02 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
mmand-line tools in one source package that creates four binary packages (runtime, dev, doc, and tools) and then a separate graphical front end that depends on the runtime and build-depends on the dev. I'll be posting an RFS for these packages probably within the next day or so. -- Jay

Re: packages.qa.d.o bug?

2004-07-23 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
"Check why" there to see the reasons. http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=cvs2svn You'll see that this is blocked by subversion which in turn is blocked by perl. Lots of things are blocked by perl, but there appears to be active effort in resolving that issue. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: packages.qa.d.o bug?

2004-07-23 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
"Check why" there to see the reasons. http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=cvs2svn You'll see that this is blocked by subversion which in turn is blocked by perl. Lots of things are blocked by perl, but there appears to be active effort in resolving that issue. -- Jay Berk

Re: Feedback wanted: audacity 1.2.1-3

2004-07-17 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
It just keeps getting better. It also was the tool that introduced me to wxWidgets (f.k.a. wxWindows) which I use for my own GUI development now. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: Feedback wanted: audacity 1.2.1-3

2004-07-17 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
It just keeps getting better. It also was the tool that introduced me to wxWidgets (f.k.a. wxWindows) which I use for my own GUI development now. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: setgid-wrapper

2004-06-02 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
, explaining the potential security risks, and have the default be "no". You can look at man-db (dpkg-reconfigure man-db) for example of how you might want to word this. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: setgid-wrapper

2004-06-02 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
, explaining the potential security risks, and have the default be "no". You can look at man-db (dpkg-reconfigure man-db) for example of how you might want to word this. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /etc/init.d/ script policy violation?

2004-05-25 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ssh, pcmcia, > hotplug and networking. Thus allowing acces to the "hanging" machine > even with pcmcia network cards. This is true only as long as DELAYLOGIN=no in /etc/default/rcS or rmnologin is moved earlier as well. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: /etc/init.d/ script policy violation?

2004-05-25 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ssh, pcmcia, > hotplug and networking. Thus allowing acces to the "hanging" machine > even with pcmcia network cards. This is true only as long as DELAYLOGIN=no in /etc/default/rcS or rmnologin is moved earlier as well. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.q

waimea: new sponsor / upload needed

2004-05-20 Thread Jay Graves
over this package and upload it for me. My new package can be found at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/ Thank you -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jay.skabber.com/

waimea: new sponsor / upload needed

2004-05-20 Thread Jay Graves
over this package and upload it for me. My new package can be found at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/ Thank you -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jay.skabber.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Upload of a new package

2004-05-19 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
lot, > Fabio. As a point of comparison, I'm helping with maintenance of the xerces packages and had xerces25 (new) uploaded by a sponsor. The package was initially uploaded on May 4 and appeared in unstable on May 18. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: Upload of a new package

2004-05-19 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
lot, > Fabio. As a point of comparison, I'm helping with maintenance of the xerces packages and had xerces25 (new) uploaded by a sponsor. The package was initially uploaded on May 4 and appeared in unstable on May 18. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org

Re: testing config/preinst mods

2004-05-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ed release-critical bugs against console-common. I'll post my solution to debian-devel today with the subject "testing config/preinst mods: one approach". -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: testing config/preinst mods

2004-05-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ed release-critical bugs against console-common. I'll post my solution to debian-devel today with the subject "testing config/preinst mods: one approach". -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

testing config/preinst mods

2004-05-07 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
somewhere, a pointer would be appreciated. The apt.conf and debconf-devel documentation have lots of hints, but nothing that looks easier than the approach I'm planning on trying. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

testing config/preinst mods

2004-05-07 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
somewhere, a pointer would be appreciated. The apt.conf and debconf-devel documentation have lots of hints, but nothing that looks easier than the approach I'm planning on trying. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

withdrawing RFS for patmv (was RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool)

2004-04-28 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
that may or may not coexist peacefully with other packages), I completely acknowledge that patmv is not something anyone will come looking for. Thanks again for the responses and interest! -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

withdrawing RFS for patmv (was RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool)

2004-04-28 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
that may or may not coexist peacefully with other packages), I completely acknowledge that patmv is not something anyone will come looking for. Thanks again for the responses and interest! -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
be its own package. I hope that this email is taken in the positive and respectful spirit with which it is intended. Any forcefulness in my language should be interpreted only as an indication of the strength of my conviction on this point. I truly appreciate the suggestions and the implicati

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > Although I failed to mention this in my initial post, the thing that > > pushed me over the edge and made me decide to submit this package for > > sponsorship was the recent inclusion of the "renameutils" package, > >

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
) and serves a different cross section of the Debian user community. > I might be willing to sponsor it; let me think about it a bit. I appreciate your consideration. So that I don't have to come across as nagging, can you give me some kind of timeframe within which you expect to respond?

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
be its own package. I hope that this email is taken in the positive and respectful spirit with which it is intended. Any forcefulness in my language should be interpreted only as an indication of the strength of my conviction on this point. I truly appreciate the suggestions and the implicati

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > Although I failed to mention this in my initial post, the thing that > > pushed me over the edge and made me decide to submit this package for > > sponsorship was the recent inclusion of the "renameutils" package, > >

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
could probably be convinced to use the Artistic license, though for something so short, I see no need to maintain any kind of artistic control. (I don't view myself as having violated the original copyright since I didn't use any of the code and since the idea was so simple, but if you disagree, by all means let me know.) --Jay

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
) and serves a different cross section of the Debian user community. > I might be willing to sponsor it; let me think about it a bit. I appreciate your consideration. So that I don't have to come across as nagging, can you give me some kind of timeframe within which you expect to respond?

RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
nd the Debian revision is 1. I thought I'd mention this so that it was clear that I did it this way on purpose. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
could probably be convinced to use the Artistic license, though for something so short, I see no need to maintain any kind of artistic control. (I don't view myself as having violated the original copyright since I didn't use any of the code and since the idea was so simple, but if you disagree, by all means let me know.) --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-26 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
nd the Debian revision is 1. I thought I'd mention this so that it was clear that I did it this way on purpose. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

wvdial prompts "by hand"... is that release critical?

2004-03-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
rge? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219151 -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

Re: RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

2004-03-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ML > group. > > If you want your welcome to join the group. Thanks. I'll definitely check this out. Someone kindly volunteered to look over my packages. Should I still move forward with the NMU? I just need to redo the packages following the proper policy for NMU which I didn&#x

wvdial prompts "by hand"... is that release critical?

2004-03-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
rge? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219151 -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

2004-03-16 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ML > group. > > If you want your welcome to join the group. Thanks. I'll definitely check this out. Someone kindly volunteered to look over my packages. Should I still move forward with the NMU? I just need to redo the packages following the proper policy for NMU which I didn&#x

Re: RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

2004-03-14 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I am interested in possibly co-maintaining the xerces packages or in > > taking them over. Ivo Timmermans, the current maintainer of the > > xerces packages, indicated on [1]debian-devel that he is "lookin

Re: RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

2004-03-14 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
> Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I am interested in possibly co-maintaining the xerces packages or in > > taking them over. Ivo Timmermans, the current maintainer of the > > xerces packages, indicated on [1]debian-devel that he is "lookin

RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

2004-03-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
simple that someone with the inclination should be able to decide to do an NMU with very little time or effort. If you're willing to sponsor me as a comaintainer of the packages, I'd like to know that too. We would, of course, have to coordinate with Ivo. Thanks for your time. -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

RFS: xerces -- or -- request for NMU

2004-03-13 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
simple that someone with the inclination should be able to decide to do an NMU with very little time or effort. If you're willing to sponsor me as a comaintainer of the packages, I'd like to know that too. We would, of course, have to coordinate with Ivo. Thanks for your time. -- Jay Be

debian packages: single diff vs multiple patches (as in rpm)

2003-12-30 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ted in hearing thoughts from other people who have converted an rpm-based infrastructure to a dpkg-based infrastructure. Lastly, please feel free to correct my terminology if I'm using it incorrectly. For example, is it correct to say dpkg-based rather than deb-based? Thanks! -- Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ql.org/q/

debian packages: single diff vs multiple patches (as in rpm)

2003-12-30 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
ted in hearing thoughts from other people who have converted an rpm-based infrastructure to a dpkg-based infrastructure. Lastly, please feel free to correct my terminology if I'm using it incorrectly. For example, is it correct to say dpkg-based rather than deb-based? Thanks! -- Jay Berke

Cleaning up my ITP list / #178035: libtest-exception-perl /Request for sponsor

2003-08-27 Thread Jay Bonci
ay.bonci.com/debian/files / Thank you much for your time, --jay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Cleaning up my ITP list / #178035: libtest-exception-perl / Request for sponsor

2003-08-27 Thread Jay Bonci
ay.bonci.com/debian/files / Thank you much for your time, --jay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#207184: libpod-coverage-perl_0.11-1(unstable/ia64): FTBFS:should be arch all?

2003-08-25 Thread Jay Bonci
g. Please let me know if you have a few minutes you're willing to spare to check and upload the fix. Thank you much for your time --jay On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 12:22, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Package: libpod-coverage-perl > Version: 0.11-1 > Severity: important >

Re: Bug#207184: libpod-coverage-perl_0.11-1(unstable/ia64): FTBFS: should be arch all?

2003-08-25 Thread Jay Bonci
g. Please let me know if you have a few minutes you're willing to spare to check and upload the fix. Thank you much for your time --jay On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 12:22, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Package: libpod-coverage-perl > Version: 0.11-1 > Severity: important >

Sponsorship request for libgeo-metar-perl (cleanup and unorphanupload)

2003-06-26 Thread Jay Bonci
h for your time, --Jay Bonci -- Jay Bonci| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: E0B8B2DE| 562B 35DC BE8D 7802 DB31 6423 64D8 790F E0B8 B2DE signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Sponsorship request for libgeo-metar-perl (cleanup and unorphan upload)

2003-06-26 Thread Jay Bonci
h for your time, --Jay Bonci -- Jay Bonci| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: E0B8B2DE| 562B 35DC BE8D 7802 DB31 6423 64D8 790F E0B8 B2DE signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: waimea NMU request

2003-04-16 Thread Jay Graves
Thanks a ton for doing this. I now see the waimea_0.4.0-3 package in unstable. On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:05:45PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Jay Graves wrote: > > > Does anyone have the time to give my package a quick look and upload it > > to main? &g

waimea NMU request

2003-04-14 Thread Jay Graves
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=waimea&archive=no that my latest package fixes. Does anyone have the time to give my package a quick look and upload it to main? The package is available at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/ Thank you. -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.ska

Request for sponsor / perl packaging help: libcarp-assert-perl

2002-10-27 Thread Jay Bonci
to help me out, that would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to contributing more, --jay bonci -- Jay Bonci| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: E0B8B2DE| 562B 35DC BE8D 7802 DB31 6423 64D8 790F E0B8 B2DE pgpYyGGU8R3u9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Request for sponsor / perl packaging help: libcarp-assert-perl

2002-10-27 Thread Jay Bonci
to help me out, that would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to contributing more, --jay bonci -- Jay Bonci| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: E0B8B2DE| 562B 35DC BE8D 7802 DB31 6423 64D8 790F E0B8 B2DE msg07626/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

2002-10-12 Thread Jay Graves
much better understanding of how this all works, that I wouldn't have if everything just worked out of the box. -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.skabber.com O__ _/`.\ `=( ' pgpF3esurdwUK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

2002-10-12 Thread Jay Graves
much better understanding of how this all works, that I wouldn't have if everything just worked out of the box. -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.skabber.com O__ _/`.\ `=( ' msg07570/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

2002-10-10 Thread Jay Graves
that didn't seem to produce any results. Thanks -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.skabber.com O__ _/`.\ `=( ' pgpmUWv5eDVKE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

2002-10-10 Thread Jay Graves
that didn't seem to produce any results. Thanks -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.skabber.com O__ _/`.\ `=( ' msg07466/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

dpkg-buildpackage problem

2002-10-10 Thread Jay Graves
c/X11/packageName ? I am not sure what other info may help. The Makefile specifies datadir = /etc/X11 TIA -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.skabber.com O__ _/`.\ `=( ' pgpg9RLYWgrpn.pgp Description: PGP signature

dpkg-buildpackage problem

2002-10-10 Thread Jay Graves
c/X11/packageName ? I am not sure what other info may help. The Makefile specifies datadir = /etc/X11 TIA -- Jay Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] jay.skabber.com O__ _/`.\ `=( ' msg07463/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Request for Sponsor: libmail-sender-perl

2002-10-02 Thread Jay Bonci
someone could take a few minutes out of their busy schedule to take a look at it, I would be very greatful. It's a pure perl package with no upstream dependancies, so it should be fairly simple. Thank you for your time... --jay -- Jay Bonci| <[EMAIL PROTECT

Request for Sponsor: libmail-sender-perl

2002-10-02 Thread Jay Bonci
. If someone could take a few minutes out of their busy schedule to take a look at it, I would be very greatful. It's a pure perl package with no upstream dependancies, so it should be fairly simple. Thank you for your time... --jay -- Jay Bonci| <[EMAIL PROTECT

  1   2   >