Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Od: Tobias Frost Hello Tobias, thank you for reviewing! "Ok, review complete. When below things are fixed, I will upload it. -- tobi d/copyright: (beside the already discussed things) - Files-Excluded not needed - Whats the copyright of the gpx examples? - src/cursors not documented d

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Od: Sebastiaan Couwenberg "I think the WTFPL short name should keep the version number, WTFPL-2 was better IMHO. The text of the QT license exception is still missing the LGPL exception text. I suggest at least the changes included in the attached patch. Since the license text of the QT commerc

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Hello, thank you all for quick responces! I've just uploaded fixed version of qmapshack 0.3.0 to debian mentors. Copyright file now follow SPDX license shortnames. wrap-and-sort -a -s has been run over control and copyright file http://mentors.debian.net/package/qmapshack best regards Jaromir

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Od: Sebastiaan Couwenberg "On 08/17/2014 06:35 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I just uploaded new upstream version of qmapshack 0.3.0 to debian mentors. > This package fixing all previous issues, I would be grateful for reviewing. Regarding the copyright file I suggest to use the S

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Hello, I just uploaded new upstream version of qmapshack 0.3.0 to debian mentors. This package fixing all previous issues, I would be grateful for reviewing. http://mentors.debian.net/package/qmapshack (I am not regenerating png icons during the build time as package don't need to repacked anym

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Od: Tobias Frost Hello Tobias, "On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 14:19 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I already managed to fix few issues in packaging repo: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/qmapshack.git Just briefly looked over it :) +1 Jut one thing (probably overlooked

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

Od: Tobias Frost Hello Tobias, "- d/copyright is incomplete, there are at least 2 files not documented for the 3rdParty folder. (CGetOpt.cpp and main.cpp) (The html file in this dir is obviously generated by doxygen), the examples gpx are also not in the copyright file. There are two anima

Bug#757243: RFS: qmapshack/0.2.0+ds1-1

y, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmapshack/qmapshack_0.2.0+ds1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Regards, Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me

RFS: pyliblo

be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/112721.25715.49793-2694-468004925-1271795...@seznam.cz

Re: RFS: tap-plugins (updated package) adopted

> Od: Luca Falavigna > Hi Jaromir, > I promised Alessio to sponsor it, so I'll have a look later. Hello Luca, thank you a lot for uploading best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis

RFS: tap-plugins (updated package) adopted

glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/112425.26958.51012-495-420439122-1271672...@seznam.cz

"pdebuild --debbuildopts -sa" does not accept orig.tar.bz2 format?

Hello mentors, I would like upload package builded in pbuilder and force pbuilder to use orig file For _.orig.tar.gz "pdebuild --debbuildopts -sa" works. But not for _.orig.tar.bz2 ... orig file is not included. I would like use orig.tar.bz2 format because upstream source is also tar.bz2 and thi

Re: create orig.tar.gz

> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire > > Yes, with source format 3.0 [1]. > > 1: http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 Thank you all ... make things clearer for me I have been unsure best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: create orig.tar.gz

> Od: Jaromír Mikeš > > Yes, just rename the original tarball to > > "_.orig.tar.gz". The orig.tar.gz is supposed to > > contain the tarball like you receive it from upstream. > > Yep ... sometimes is solution in front of nose ;) BTW what about orig.tar.bz2

Re: create orig.tar.gz

> Od: Adrian Glaubitz > Yes, just rename the original tarball to > "_.orig.tar.gz". The orig.tar.gz is supposed to > contain the tarball like you receive it from upstream. Yep ... sometimes is solution in front of nose ;) thank you mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@li

create orig.tar.gz

Hello mentors, Exist some way to create _.orig.tar.gz from -.tar.gz without complete debianization? And make md5 for both files identical? best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: RFS: zynjacku

Od: Asheesh Laroia Hi, Some feedback for you: During the build process, I get this message: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unused substitution variable ${python:Versions} I asked on #debian-python and only answer I get was that I can ignore this. It'd be great if you'd ask about that on #debi

Re: RFS: zynjacku

Od: Asheesh Laroia > * Package name: zynjacku Sorry -- not yet. Super busy. Ask again in another 10 days or so. -- Asheesh. Hello there, Nobody was uploaded zynjacku package yet. So it would be nice if you can do it for me. best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ment

Re: RFS: zynjacku

Od: Asheesh Laroia >> > * Package name: zynjacku Sorry -- not yet. Super busy. Ask again in another 10 days or so. Ok ... I will .. thanks best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: RFS: zynjacku

Od: Asheesh Laroia > * Package name: zynjacku It looks like a cool package -- I hope you get a sponsor! If not, I'll be freer in a fortnight. Re-ping the list then. Hello, It would be great if you can upload zynjacku for me ... best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

RFS: zynjacku

nd regards Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: lash (updated package)

be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: jcgui

URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jcgui - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jcgui/jcgui_0.7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Jaromír Mik

Re: debian/watch sourceforge

Od: Daniel Leidert > > having troubles get my watch file work on sourceforge files. > > tracking files: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/jcgui/files/jcgui/ > > > > I tried this in my watch file: > > http://sf.net/jcgui/jcgui-(.+)\.tar\.bz2 > > A dot means "any character". So your watch file

debian/watch sourceforge

hello mentors, having troubles get my watch file work on sourceforge files. tracking files: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jcgui/files/jcgui/ I tried this in my watch file: http://sf.net/jcgui/jcgui-(.+)\.tar\.bz2 Any advice? regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@

Re: watch nasty hack

> Od: Chow Loong Jin > Předmět: Re: watch nasty hack > > Hello mentors, > > > > I having watch file like this: > > http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html > jconvolver-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 > > > > to monitor jconvolver-0.8.4.tar.bz2 , but watch file monitoring > jconvolver-reverbs.ta

watch nasty hack

Hello mentors, I having watch file like this: http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html jconvolver-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 to monitor jconvolver-0.8.4.tar.bz2 , but watch file monitoring jconvolver-reverbs.tar.bz2 as well and suggesting it as update. If modify watch file like this: htt

Re: Bug#556347: FTBFS with binutils-gold

> Od: Peter Fritzsche > Source: slv2 > Version: 0.6.6-2 > Severity: minor > User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de > Usertags: no-add-needed > > Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The > important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU >

Re: swami - libgtk1.2

> Od: Barry deFreese > >> > >> Get upstream to port it to GTK+ 2.0 and ensure that it will be > >> compatible with GTK+ 3.0 (which will remove a bunch of deprecated > >> stuff from GTK+ 2.0). An alternative would be to send upstream a patch > >> for that.

Re: different package and source name

> Od: Don Armstrong > > I am preparing package from 'lv2-c++-tools' source. It is library so I > > called > packages 'lv2-c++-tools0' and 'lv2-c++-tools-dev' > > But I got this warning from lintian: > > W: lv2-c++-tools0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpaq0 > > > > I renamed packages to l

Re: different package and source name

> Od: Don Armstrong JM> > I am preparing package from 'lv2-c++-tools' source. It is library so I called JM> > packages 'lv2-c++-tools0' and 'lv2-c++-tools-dev' JM> > But I got this warning from lintian: JM> > W: lv2-c++-tools0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpaq0 JM> > I renamed packages

Re: debian/watch

> Od: Ben Finney > > Having watch file like this: > > version=3 > > > http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ll-plugins/lv2-c++-tools-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 > > > > Can anybody advice why uscan cannot reach this source? > > Probably because the source specification is interpreted as a regex. As > well

different package and source name

Hello mentors, I am preparing package from 'lv2-c++-tools' source. It is library so I called packages 'lv2-c++-tools0' and 'lv2-c++-tools-dev' But I got this warning from lintian: W: lv2-c++-tools0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpaq0 I renamed packages to libpaq0 and libpaq-dev. My quest

debian/watch

Hello mentors, I trying monitor "lv2-c++-tools" source on http://mirror.lihnidos.org/GNU/savannah/ll-plugins/. Having watch file like this: version=3 http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ll-plugins/lv2-c++-tools-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 Can anybody advice why uscan cannot reach this source? I tested

Re: script-with-language-extension

> Od: Charles Plessy > JM> > I have output this output from lintian: JM> > -- JM> > W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> > W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> > W: zynjacku: script

Re: script-with-language-extension

> Od: Ben Finney MP> > Stick zynjacku.py in a proper library path somewhere, and write a MP> > little shim wrapper to stick in /usr/bin that calls zynjacku as it MP> > expects to be called. BF> Yes, that's one way to do it, and quite valid. It does, though, involve BF> creating that shim separa

Re: script-with-language-extension

> Od: Matthew Palmer JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks JM> > with same name and in same location. JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku JM> > usr/bin/zynspect JM> > -- JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> > usr/bin/zynspect.py

Re: script-with-language-extension

> Od: Chow Loong Jin > You should probably try reading the Debian Python New Policy[1] and getting > help > from #debian-python on OFTC or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org. > > [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy I didn't know that there is debian-python list, I will try ask there.

Re: script-with-language-extension

> Od: Jaromír Mikeš JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks with JM> same name and in same location. JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku JM> > usr/bin/zynspect JM> > -- JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> &g

Re: script-with-language-extension

> Od: Chow Loong Jin JM> > I did it, but it breaks functionality ... there exist also symlinks with same JM> name and in same location. JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku JM> > usr/bin/zynspect JM> > -- JM> > usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> > usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> > usr/bin/zynspect.py >

Re: script-with-language-extension

From: Jose Luis Rivas JM> I have output this output from lintian: JM> -- JM> W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py JM> W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py JM> W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynspect.py JM>

script-with-language-extension

Hello mentors, I have output this output from lintian: -- W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/lv2rack.py W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynjacku.py W: zynjacku: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/zynspect.py -- I tried (one by one)

Re: python-support

> Od: Paul Wise - > Please read the output of lintian-info --tags > executable-not-elf-or-script and act accordingly. I'll try thank you regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Re: script-not-executable

> Od: Ben Finney JM> > Ok. Can I make override for it. BF> You *can* make an override for any warnings. The warnings are there for BF> good reasons, though, so you shouldn't ignore them without a good BF> understanding of why, and an even better reason why the warning doesn't BF> apply. BF> You

Re: script-not-executable

> Od: Christoph Egger JM> > Hello mentors, JM> > One package I am preparing for upload has this warning: JM> > W: lv2fil: script-not-executable ./usr/lib/lv2/filter.lv2/ui JM> > Can someone advise me how to fix it please? CE> Let me guess, the file has a shebang (#!/usr/bin/python or such)

Re: script-not-executable

> Od: Christoph Egger JM> > Hello mentors, JM> > One package I am preparing for upload has this warning: JM> > W: lv2fil: script-not-executable ./usr/lib/lv2/filter.lv2/ui JM> > Can someone advise me how to fix it please? CE> Let me guess, the file has a shebang (#!/usr/bin/python or such)

script-not-executable

Hello mentors, One package I am preparing for upload has this warning: W: lv2fil: script-not-executable ./usr/lib/lv2/filter.lv2/ui Can someone advise me how to fix it please? thanks for help mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

python-support

Hello mentors, just preparing package which need python-support. I had these warning in lintian before applying python-support: W: zynjacku: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/zynworld/__init__.py W: zynjacku: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/lib/python

Re: swami - libgtk1.2

> Od: Paul Wise > > Get upstream to port it to GTK+ 2.0 and ensure that it will be > compatible with GTK+ 3.0 (which will remove a bunch of deprecated > stuff from GTK+ 2.0). An alternative would be to send upstream a patch > for that. If upstream is not a

swami - libgtk1.2

Hello, I am considering adopt swami package, which is now uninstallable in sid, because it's libgtk1.2-dev dependency. I've tried change build dependency in debian/control file to libgtk2.0-dev and build package in pbulder, but it didn't build. What is solution for such issue? regards mira

Re: Adopting package

> Od: Ryan Niebur JM> > I send email for adopting lash package, but I am not sure if I did it right. JM> > I've got confirmation message with this link: JM> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548432 JM> > Is everything like it should be? JW> No, you should retitle the original

Re: Adopting package

> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire JM> > I send email for adopting lash package, but I am not sure if I did it right. > > JM> > I've got confirmation message with this link: JM> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548432 > > JM> > Is everything like it should be? > JW> No, you should ret

Adopting package

Hello mentors, I send email for adopting lash package, but I am not sure if I did it right. I've got confirmation message with this link: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548432 Is everything like it should be? regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@

Re: Canceled ITP for "lv2dynparam1_2-1_amd64.changes is NEW"

> Původní zpráva > Od: Sandro Tosi > Předmět: Re: Canceled ITP for "lv2dynparam1_2-1_amd64.changes is NEW" > Datum: 14.9.2009 22:04:16 > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 21:45, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > &

Re: Canceled ITP for "lv2dynparam1_2-1_amd64.changes is NEW"

> Od: Paul Wise JM > I reopened ITP: JM > bts reopen 524285 JM > Hope it will be fine soon. PW > That won't work since it is archived. You need to unarchive it and PW > then reopen it. I did this. $ bts unarchive 524285 $ bts reopen 524285 Now I am expecting some confirmation email that bug

Re: Canceled ITP for "lv2dynparam1_2-1_amd64.changes is NEW"

Hello, Thank you all for help. I reopened ITP: bts reopen 524285 Hope it will be fine soon. regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Canceled ITP for "lv2dynparam1_2-1_amd64.changes is NEW"

Hello mentors, my package was uploaded and waiting for acceptance. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html Unfortunately ITP for this package was canceled by some other debian process few weeks ago. I've got email about it, but I didn't pay attention to it believed it is some mistake. Can it b

Re: debian/copyright and autoconfig files

> Od: Charles Plessy JM> > Hello mentors, > > JM> > I have a question about debian/copyright file and autoconf files JM> > (acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4, configure, Makefile.in etc). > > JM> > Should be entries for these files included in debian copyright files? > > Hello Jaromír, > > as an unwritten

debian/copyright and autoconfig files

Hello mentors, I have a question about debian/copyright file and autoconf files (acinclude.m4, aclocal.m4, configure, Makefile.in etc). Should be entries for these files included in debian copyright files? Thank you for help mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb

lv2dynparam1

Hello mentors, I am preparing package of library lv2dynparam1. http://download.gna.org/lv2dynparam/ My problem is that source actually building two libraries: liblv2dynparamhost1-1 liblv2dynparamplugin1-0 If make just two packages liblv2dynparam1 and liblv2dynparam1-dev then I have this warnin

pbuilderrc BINDMOUNTS option

Hi all, I am using successfully this trick on my 32bit Ubuntu Hardy based machine for building packages in pbuilder with local packages. (very first paragraph) http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks Now I am trying make same set-up on my new 64bit machine with debian-sid installed, but having t

Re: Re: watch file problem

> Od: Sebastian Harl Hi Sebastian, > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 01:19:15PM +0200, Jarom?r Mike? wrote: > > I am building package from source downloaded here: > > https://launchpad.net/invada-studio/+download > > > > and this is file I would like to monitor by watch file: > > invada-studio-plugins_

watch file problem

Hi all, I am building package from source downloaded here: https://launchpad.net/invada-studio/+download and this is file I would like to monitor by watch file: invada-studio-plugins_0.3.1-nopkg.tar.gz I tried this forms in watch file: https://launchpad.net/invada-studio/+download/invada-studio

Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

Hi all, I would like to ask one other question here. Let say that I have two different working debian/symbols file; one for i386 and one for amd64 architecture. .symbols.i386 .symbols.amd64 Q1: How to care about other architectures which I am not able test? Q2: Should I have in one other symbols f

Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

> Od: Paul Wise PW> I looked at your symbols files and saw lots of lines starting with PW> #MISSING:. This indicates that some symbols have dissappeared from PW> your library at some stage in the history of that symbols file. That PW> means that the ABI changed without a corresponding change in t

Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

> Od: Paul Wise JM> > Working debian symbols files are in attachments. (they are different in the JM> end of them) PW> You have a lot of #MISSING: lines, did the ABI get broken without a PW> SONAME change. Hi, I am not sure if I understand well your question. I've change nothing consciously I

Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

> Od: Paul Wise JM> > Working debian symbols files are in attachments. (they are different in the JM> end of them) PW> You have a lot of #MISSING: lines, did the ABI get broken without a PW> SONAME change. Hi, I am not sure if I understand well your question. I've change nothing consciously I

Re: Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

> Od: Ryan Niebur > see the dpkg-gensymbols manpage. it explains how to use different > symbols files for different architectures. I see it now Thank you.. mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l

different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

Hi all, I am upgrading library package here and it seems that dpkg-gensymbols asking different debian/symbols file for my 32bit system and different for 64bit one. Working debian symbols files are in attachments. (they are different in the end of them) Can someone advise me how such issue solve

Re: RFS: slv2

> Od: Free Ekanayaka > JM> I would like to do it, but having problem to log in. > > JM> Should I create new account or try pkg-ml email + passwd? > > I think you have to create a new account: > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging?action=newaccount Hi there, Problem

Re: make in pbuilder error

> Od: Neil Williams JM> > r...@64studio:~/chroot/sid# find /home/mira/chroot/sid/usr/lib -type f -exec JM> grep -l "dynparam_ui_group_disappeared" {} \; JM> > /home/mira/chroot/sid/usr/lib/liblv2dynparamhost1.so.1.0.0 JM> > /home/mira/chroot/sid/usr/lib/liblv2dynparamhost1.a NW> No, those aren

Re: make in pbuilder error

> Od: Neil Williams NW> > > You need to work out which library (libfoo.so) contains the undefined NW> > > references and ensure that the objects are linked against them. JM> > I've tried. Is there some good way how find library with these referencies? NW> grep NW> If it's a packaged library, i

Re: make in pbuilder error

> Od: Neil Williams > > > You need to work out which library (libfoo.so) contains the undefined > > > references and ensure that the objects are linked against them. > > > > I've tried. Is there some good way how find library with these referencies? > > grep > > If it's a packaged library, it

Re: make in pbuilder error

> Od: Neil Williams > You need to work out which library (libfoo.so) contains the undefined > references and ensure that the objects are linked against them. I've tried. Is there some good way how find library with these referencies? > It could be that a dependency that exists outside the pbuil

Re: make in pbuilder error

> Od: Chow Loong Jin > > I have error output in pbuilder in "make" stage of process. > > But when I running make command outside pbuilder everything is fine. > > I think that I satisfied all dependencies in debian/control file. > > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wall -g -O2 -ver

make in pbuilder error

Hello , I have error output in pbuilder in "make" stage of process. But when I running make command outside pbuilder everything is fine. I think that I satisfied all dependencies in debian/control file. Any advice is very appreciated regards mira /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc

libgtk2.0-dev

Hello mentors, I just building package which need libgtk2.0-dev like build dependency. I am getting this output in pbuilder: --- The following packages have unmet dependencies: libpango1.0-0: Depends: libdatrie0 (>= 0.1.2) but it is not installable The following actions will resol

Re: dlclose, dlopen ...

Od: Jaromír Mikeš > > having these errors on building here: > > > > > > .libs/lv2.o: In function `zynjacku_lv2_unload': > > /tmp/buildd/zynjacku-4/lv2.c:171: undefined reference to `dlclose' > > .libs/lv2.o: In function `zynjacku_

Re: dlclose, dlopen ...

Od: Basile STARYNKEVITCH > having these errors on building here: > > > .libs/lv2.o: In function `zynjacku_lv2_unload': > /tmp/buildd/zynjacku-4/lv2.c:171: undefined reference to `dlclose' > .libs/lv2.o: In function `zynjacku_lv2_load': > /tmp/buildd/zynjacku-4/lv2.c:99: undefined

dlclose, dlopen ...

Hello mentors, having these errors on building here: .libs/lv2.o: In function `zynjacku_lv2_unload': /tmp/buildd/zynjacku-4/lv2.c:171: undefined reference to `dlclose' .libs/lv2.o: In function `zynjacku_lv2_load': /tmp/buildd/zynjacku-4/lv2.c:99: undefined reference to `dlopen' /tmp/

Re: RFS: slv2

> Od: Jaromír Mikeš > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slv2". > > * Package name: slv2 > Version : 0.6.2-1 > Upstream Author : Dave Robillard > * URL : http://drobilla.net/software/slv2 > * License

Re: no-symbols-control-file

> Od: Paul Wise > You should only run that manually to create the initial symbols file, > dh_makeshlibs should take care of running the right dpkg-gensymbols > call during the build process. > In addition you generally need to strip the Debian version from each > symbol as explained by the linti

Re: no-symbols-control-file

> Od: Paul Wise > > I: libslv2-9: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 > > > > Can someone advice me please how satisfied lintian? > > First, make sure you have read and understood libpkg-guide: > > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html > > Second,

no-symbols-control-file

Hello mentors, I have this output for lintian -IE X: slv2: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lv2_jack_host succesfully successfully X: slv2: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host succesfully successfully I: libslv2-9: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 Can some

Re: RFS: lv2core

> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire > > Thank you for all these comments I was working on removing these problems. > > Package is builded in sid pbuilder and checked by lintian -I in sid chroot. > > Lintian output seems to be clear. > > Yes, lintian is clean (though keep in mind it is not an indicator of a

Re: RFS: lv2core

> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lv2core". > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > No, it doesn't: > > W: lv2core source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is > 3.8.1) > W: lv2core source: maintainer-also-in-uploaders > P: lv2core: copy

Re: RFS: lv2core

> Od: Andreas Rottmann Hi, Thank you for great info it helped a lot, but there was troubles for me. > If you want to package stuff for Debian, it would be best (or rather > necessary, I'd say) to do so in a pristine Debian system. You can set up > a sid chroot easily with the cdebootstrap packa

Re: chroot

> Od: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > >> process stay on line > >> > >> P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt > > Sorry for this question ... it is quite known issue > > > > Is there other way how to test .change file with lintian in sid e.g. > pbuilder? > > Yould either use "pbuilder --log

Re: chroot

> Od: Jaromír Mikeš > process stay on line > > P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt Sorry for this question ... it is quite known issue Is there other way how to test .change file with lintian in sid e.g. pbuilder? regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: upload

> Od: Mauro Lizaur > > I uploaded package to debian.mentors and I saw fault in description. > > So I delete it, repair and tried upload again. > > Now I have problem upload getting messages for dupload: > > ok, already done for mentors ... Nothing to upload > Hi there, > try deleting the file e

chroot

Hello mentors, trying set up chroot sid environment here. After processing #cdebootstrap sid /path/to/chroot process stay on line P: Configuring helper cdebootstrap-helper-apt Just want to know if it is normal and I should continue set up chroot. Or there is something wrong. I am using this

Re: RFS: slv2

> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:14:08AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slv2". > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > Your .install files should not say 'debian/tmp/' on th

Re: RFS: lv2core

> Původní zpráva > Od: Jaromír Mikeš > Předmět: Re: RFS: lv2core > Datum: 08.4.2009 02:50:00 > > > Od: Jonathan Wiltshire > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lv2core". &g

Re: RFS: lv2core

> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lv2core". > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > No, it doesn't: > > W: lv2core source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is > 3.8.1) > W: lv2core source: maintainer-also-in-uploaders > P: lv2core: copy

Re: problem sign .changes

> Od: Craig Small > > how-to sign .dsc and .changes files? > debsign file.changes > > > I tried $ debsing -sgpg file.changes > > and have error: secret key not available > gpg is the default. > > > I already generated my key by $gpg --gen-key command. > do you have ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg ? Yes

Re: problem sign .changes

> Od: Ben Finney > > Jaromír Mikeš writes: > > > Hello mentors, > > > > how-to sign .dsc and .changes files? > > > > I tried $ debsing -sgpg file.changes > > and have error: secret key not available > > Please show the actual error out

Re: problem sign .changes

> Od: Tony Mancill > Use the -m switch to specify which private key you'd like to use. I use > it like this: > > debsign -mtmanc...@debian.org package.changes Thank you works perfectly for me. mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

RFS: slv2

me. Kind regards Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: lv2core

net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lv2core/lv2core_3.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Jaromír Mikeš -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &q

upload

Hello mentors, I uploaded package to debian.mentors and I saw fault in description. So I delete it, repair and tried upload again. Now I have problem upload getting messages for dupload: ok, already done for mentors ... Nothing to upload thanks for advice mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

  1   2   >