Re: dh_suidregister -> ?

2001-02-06 Thread JP Sugarbroad
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:11:31AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > > Packages should almost never call dpkg_statoverride themselves. > > Earlier, that meant that the setuid/setgid bits got cleared > automatically by some daemon, is that not true anymore? Also, since the > setgid/setuid bit isn't i

Re: dh_suidregister -> ?

2001-02-05 Thread JP Sugarbroad
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 07:11:31AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > > Packages should almost never call dpkg_statoverride themselves. > > Earlier, that meant that the setuid/setgid bits got cleared > automatically by some daemon, is that not true anymore? Also, since the > setgid/setuid bit isn't

Re: dh_suidregister -> ?

2001-02-05 Thread JP Sugarbroad
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:58:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Hmmm, so my use of suidregister/dpkg-statoverride in the jwhois package > isn't really a correct implementation? I am creating a group when the > package is installed to own the shared cache it uses, and setgid the binary > and the c

Re: dh_suidregister -> ?

2001-02-05 Thread JP Sugarbroad
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:58:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Hmmm, so my use of suidregister/dpkg-statoverride in the jwhois package > isn't really a correct implementation? I am creating a group when the > package is installed to own the shared cache it uses, and setgid the binary > and the

Re: Package question

2001-02-04 Thread JP Sugarbroad
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 03:54:13AM -0600, taral wrote: > Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the > announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it. I just realized that that's really ambiguous. I updated it, but I'm not a maintainer yet, so I can't upload it

Package question

2001-02-04 Thread JP Sugarbroad
Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. "Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity." pgpfnWVhgQctu.pgp Description:

Re: Package question

2001-02-04 Thread JP Sugarbroad
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 03:54:13AM -0600, taral wrote: > Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the > announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it. I just realized that that's really ambiguous. I updated it, but I'm not a maintainer yet, so I can't upload i

Package question

2001-02-04 Thread JP Sugarbroad
Right, I just updated tkrat again... where should I send the announcements? I'm sure the people on the devel list don't want it. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. "Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity." PGP signature

New maintainer :)

2001-01-27 Thread JP Sugarbroad
I'm adopting the tkrat package that was recently orphaned. As I posted on debian-devel, I'm looking for a developer in Austin, TX who can sign my GPG key :) Anyone know who? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. "Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to

New maintainer :)

2001-01-27 Thread JP Sugarbroad
I'm adopting the tkrat package that was recently orphaned. As I posted on debian-devel, I'm looking for a developer in Austin, TX who can sign my GPG key :) Anyone know who? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. "Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down t