e any tips to handle the
> synchronization between the arrayfire and arrayfire-cuda packages? Any other
> examples of a set-up like this in the archive?
Have a look at starpu [1] and starpu-contrib [2].
Regards
Graham
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/starpu.html
[2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/starpu-contrib.html
On 9 September 2015 at 04:42, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:36:00PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> 2. or provide two source packages, of which main would build only
>> CPU implementation while in non-free would build both/only GPU
>> (depending how organized).
>
> Yeah
On 02/05/15 16:40, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
Dear Mentors ,
I heard Python isn't freesoftware at pycon (yesterday). Is't true?
--Regards
Mohsen
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org
; 4. Please, upload your final package to mentors.debian.net.
Uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/asic0x
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https:
modem,
but after installing the package, the kernel module should build without
error
and should appear in /lib/modules//updates/dkms/ as
asic0x.ko.
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
ecmd?
Is this still required, seeing that doublecmd is not a fork of tuxcmd?
Regards
Graham
[1] http://netcode.cz/projects/seksicmd/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
-qt - twin-panel (commander-style) file manager (Qt4)
doublecmd-qt-dbg - twin-panel (commander-style) file manager (Qt4 - Debug)
My packaging attempt is available here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/doublecmd.git
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me
I've pushed some commits to the git on collab-maint.
I added a comment about the overridden Lintian spelling error
warnings, rewrote the package descriptions, merged the changes I had
made in d/control into d/control.in and regenerated d/control, and
updated d/watch.
I did find Ubuntu bug LP: #81
On 20 November 2013 20:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Alioth is up again.
I see, thanks.
I've created a VCS [1] and have imported all of the previous versions.
I'll add my changes as individual commits.
>> Additional question: have you checked if you could solve one of the
>> Ubuntu bugs against mtin
> Isn't it (easily) possible to fix these spelling errors, or are they
> false positives? If you stick to the overrides, please document why in
> the override file.
Well, they occur in non-English messages so I would say false positives,
but perhaps the best solution is for me to ask in the rele
ning flags.
* Override remaining Lintian spelling error warnings.
* Add keywords entries to d/*.desktop.
Regards
Graham
diff -Nru mtink-1.0.16/debian/changelog mtink-1.0.16/debian/changelog
--- mtink-1.0.16/debian/changelog 2013-09-06 20:54:56.0 +0200
+++ mtink-1.0.16/debian/changelog 2013-1
On 11 October 2013 19:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Anyway, why does dx need/use the symlink
> if it can, apparently, function well without the data.
>
If dx-doc and dxsamples are not installed, dx still functions, except that
the online help and samples are not available.
My reasoning was that if ei
On 07/10/2013 19:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
Ah, I now see what you mean. The /usr/share/dx/java/* and
/usr/share/dx/samples/* are files in dxsamples. Why did you want to move
them from dxsamples to dx? Most of the time, but certainly not always, I
would put them in the package that provides the targe
On 05/10/2013 19:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
What I intended you to do is to state the above also in bug 412811, so
that it is clear for people looking at that bug report. And when you
communicate with debian-legal, make sure the bug is in CC.
I will do. I intend to follow up in both bugs after I h
> I am going to move the symlinks into the dx package and also add suggests
> on libdx4-dev (or dx-dev), libhdf4|5 (needed by one of the samples) and
> possibly others to the dxsamples package.
I only added the suggests on libdx4-dev, libhdf4*-dev and others are in
turn suggested by libdx4-dev.
>
require interactors to be built, I feel that
dxsamples needs a suggests on libdx4-dev or the virtual package dx-dev.
Does that seem reasonable, and which is preferred?
Regards
Graham
mmended by dxsamples Does that seem reasonable?
For the small number of samples that require interactors to be built, I
feel that dxsamples needs a suggests on libdx4-dev or the virtual
package dx-dev. Does that seem reasonable, and which is preferred?
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
on tcsh, c-shell
- bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no further changes)
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52459fa5.7010...@nerve.org.za
I've updated to 0.5.7 in the git. I was able to drop one of the patches
included upstream and none of the others required refreshing.
Dropping CCs now as my last mail did end up on the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
have it, version 0.5.7 was released two days ago.
It contains some bug fixes, so I'd like to update my packaging for the
new version before you upload.
Apologies for the CCs, but I'm not sure if this is going to end up on
the list.
Regards
Graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me
s spelling errors reported by Lintian.
* Use 'set -e' in mtink.postinst.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes).
Regards
Graham
mtink-qa-upload.patch
Description: Binary data
Large and constantly updating spyware database that helps in finding and
removing 0-day new spyware.
http://www.antispywarecash.com/bill/
All the sounds of the earth are like music.
Everything you can imagine is real.
It is human nature to think wisely and act foolishly.
--
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature Packet(tag 2)(277 bytes)
Ver 3 - old
Hash material(5
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pyx (0.3.1-1) package.
pyx is a python module for generating encapsulated postscript graphics
out of python primitives that abstract postscript and tex/latex. pyx is
commonly used for create 2 and 3d plots for papers. for example, the
following python code produces
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature Packet(tag 2)(277 bytes)
Ver 3 - old
Hash material(5
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pyx (0.3.1-1) package.
pyx is a python module for generating encapsulated postscript graphics
out of python primitives that abstract postscript and tex/latex. pyx is
commonly used for create 2 and 3d plots for papers. for example, the
following python code produces
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:56:48AM -0500, Ed Strauch wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the SystemC package. I have a package
> that has been tested and would like to have someone to look at it.
please tell us something about this package.
> This package is built for the 'testing' distributio
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:56:48AM -0500, Ed Strauch wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the SystemC package. I have a package
> that has been tested and would like to have someone to look at it.
please tell us something about this package.
> This package is built for the 'testing' distributio
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:55:21AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
> >discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
> >all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
> >proposal, or did I miss something?
[...]
> Also: What are
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:55:21AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
> >discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
> >all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
> >proposal, or did I miss something?
[...]
> Also: What are
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:40:23AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> >> Package: pyx
> >
> > the subject should be:
> >
> > Subject: RFS: pyx -- Pyt
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:40:23AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> >> Package: pyx
> >
> > the subject should be:
> >
> > Subject: RFS: pyx -- Pyt
Package: pgpdump
Version: 0.19-1
Homepage: http://pgp.iijlab.net/pgpdump.html
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: PGP packet visualizer
pgpdump is a PGP packet visualizer that displays the sequence of OpenPGP
or PGP version 2 packets from a file.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> Package: pyx
the subject should be:
Subject: RFS: pyx -- Python module for generating PostScript graphics
thats what i get for using mutt.
--
gram
pgpPNFNQOhsI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: pyx
Version: 0.3.1-1
Homepage: http://pyx.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: Python module for generating PostScript graphics
PyX is a Python package for the creation of encapsulated PostScript
figures. It provides both an abstr
Package: pgpdump
Version: 0.19-1
Homepage: http://pgp.iijlab.net/pgpdump.html
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: PGP packet visualizer
pgpdump is a PGP packet visualizer that displays the sequence of OpenPGP
or PGP version 2 packets from a file.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> Package: pyx
the subject should be:
Subject: RFS: pyx -- Python module for generating PostScript graphics
thats what i get for using mutt.
--
gram
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: pyx
Version: 0.3.1-1
Homepage: http://pyx.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: Python module for generating PostScript graphics
PyX is a Python package for the creation of encapsulated PostScript
figures. It provides both an abstr
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:48:08PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> Package: tdl
oops. the sujbect should be
Subject: RFS: tdl -- todo list manager
--
gram
pgp2p0D5n9MUk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: tdl
Version: 1.4-1
Homepage: http://www.rrbcurnow.freeuk.com/tdl/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: todo list manager
tdl is a program for managing a 'to-do' list of pending jobs that you
have.
.
Besides basic features like adding ne
Package: colordiff
Version: 1.0.2-1
Homepage: http://colordiff.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: tool to colorize 'diff' output
ColorDiff is a wrapper for for the 'diff' command. It produces
the same output as diff, but with colored hig
i am looking for a sponsor for themus. the package is (fairly) linda and
lintian clean. it is available from my private apt repository [1].
here is an excerpt from the control file:
Source: themus
Maintainer: Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Section: gnome
Priority: optional
Architectur
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:27AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Graham Wilson
> > Priority: important
>
> Is it? Really?
thats what it was when i adopted it. i havent changed it. and since
man-db depends on it, according to policy, bsdmainutils has to be at
i am looking a sponsor bsdmainutils. the package is (mostly) linda and
lintian clean. it is avaiable from my private apt repository [1].
here is an excerpt from the control file:
Package: bsdmainutils
Version: 5.20030320-1
Section: utils
Priority: important
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 04:37:47PM -0500, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> Hello,
hello.
> I'm unsure exactly what to do next, however, because it is unclear. Am
> I supposed to file an ITP bug against WNPP? Or should I find a sponsor
> first?
either one. i dont think it matters too much.
> (it seems tha
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 04:37:47PM -0500, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> Hello,
hello.
> I'm unsure exactly what to do next, however, because it is unclear. Am
> I supposed to file an ITP bug against WNPP? Or should I find a sponsor
> first?
either one. i dont think it matters too much.
> (it seems tha
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:04:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Are the files purely written by Apache or are they configuration
> > files? If the latter, then I think they should reside in /etc.
> > Otherwise I think /var/lib is the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a
> *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2
> support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just
> stop uploadin
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:04:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Are the files purely written by Apache or are they configuration
> > files? If the latter, then I think they should reside in /etc.
> > Otherwise I think /var/lib is the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a
> *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2
> support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just
> stop uploadin
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > Comments?
[...]
> Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> debate it?
shou
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > Comments?
[...]
> Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> debate it?
shou
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > For Sponsorship?
> > Comments?
>
> AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also
> include ITA
in this case, the ITA
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > For Sponsorship?
> > Comments?
>
> AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also
> include ITA
in this case, the ITA
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:16:11 -0600, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> >dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { print $3 }'
>
> Well, I just said that I consider foo to be bad overkill, and yo
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:16:11 -0600, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> >dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { print $3 }'
>
> Well, I just said that I consider foo to be bad overkill, and yo
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Parsing /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/changelog.gz is out of the question
> since /usr/share/doc need not be present, and calling dpkg --list
> $PACKAGE and parsing its output looks like bad overkill.
dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { p
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Parsing /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/changelog.gz is out of the question
> since /usr/share/doc need not be present, and calling dpkg --list
> $PACKAGE and parsing its output looks like bad overkill.
dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { p
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIK, non-free only needs permission to redistribute.
>
> Yes. For examples of disqualified-from-non-free software look at the
> various installers. Newer Sun JDKs also haven't made
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIK, non-free only needs permission to redistribute.
>
> Yes. For examples of disqualified-from-non-free software look at the
> various installers. Newer Sun JDKs also haven't made
[cc'ing colin so that maybe he will add something to his page about
dchroot.]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:31:57AM -0800, Brett Cundal wrote:
> > Is there some other way to handle this automatically?
>
> Yeah: get a decent chroot ;)
>
[cc'ing colin so that maybe he will add something to his page about
dchroot.]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:31:57AM -0800, Brett Cundal wrote:
> > Is there some other way to handle this automatically?
>
> Yeah: get a decent chroot ;)
>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:28:32AM +0100, Till Gerken wrote:
> These are the options Sean Perry (my sponsor) and I have come up with:
>
> - remove xmms from the dependency list and move it to suggests (which
> is not handled by apt)
i think this would be the best option.
--
gram
pgp7iDeOBvGLq
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:28:32AM +0100, Till Gerken wrote:
> These are the options Sean Perry (my sponsor) and I have come up with:
>
> - remove xmms from the dependency list and move it to suggests (which
> is not handled by apt)
i think this would be the best option.
--
gram
pgp0.pgp
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibs.shlibs:
>
> ibICE 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libSM 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libX11 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXext 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXft 1 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXi 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibs.shlibs:
>
> ibICE 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libSM 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libX11 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXext 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXft 1 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXi 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:43:10AM +0100, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hi!
hello.
> I just build my first binary package. May anybody have a look over it?
> Lintian (woody) reports no errors/warnings, but i think it's still not
> perfect ;-)
could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:43:10AM +0100, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hi!
hello.
> I just build my first binary package. May anybody have a look over it?
> Lintian (woody) reports no errors/warnings, but i think it's still not
> perfect ;-)
could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:37:28PM -0500, David Grant wrote:
> Hi,
hello.
> I'm getting this Lintain error for my package called "gav":
>
> E: gav: changelog-file-not-compressed CHANGELOG
>
> CHANGELOG is the upstream changelog for the source package and it is in
> the package source root dire
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:37:28PM -0500, David Grant wrote:
> Hi,
hello.
> I'm getting this Lintain error for my package called "gav":
>
> E: gav: changelog-file-not-compressed CHANGELOG
>
> CHANGELOG is the upstream changelog for the source package and it is in
> the package source root dire
please dont resend your message twice.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
> but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
> that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
it s
please dont resend your message twice.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
> but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
> that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
it s
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:51:04AM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> I appreciate the response. However, it brings up two questions. I
> went through the list of packages last night. A. How do I determine
> if anyone even gives a rip about the package any longer? ( I noticed
> many of the bug rep
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:51:04AM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> I appreciate the response. However, it brings up two questions. I
> went through the list of packages last night. A. How do I determine
> if anyone even gives a rip about the package any longer? ( I noticed
> many of the bug rep
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Samuel Desseaux wrote:
> *FTP-Master: where could i find more informations about that? It seems
> interessant but not very clear.
you cant just sign up to be an ftp-master. i dont really know, but id
have to guess that you could become one after having wor
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Samuel Desseaux wrote:
> *FTP-Master: where could i find more informations about that? It seems
> interessant but not very clear.
you cant just sign up to be an ftp-master. i dont really know, but id
have to guess that you could become one after having wor
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts |
> > ttf-larabie-deco
>
> That is indeed the same thing. This means my original requirement is not
> entirely what I want either. What I mean is "ttf-freefont is suf
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-deco
>
> That is indeed the same thing. This means my original requirement is not
> entirely what I want either. What I mean is "ttf-freefont is sufficie
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> This means that either :
> a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
> ttf-la
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> This means that either :
> a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
> ttf-la
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:20:49PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install
> them manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure
> suitable to be an apt source (anyone care to enlighten me?).
i like to use mini-dinstall for doing
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:20:49PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install
> them manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure
> suitable to be an apt source (anyone care to enlighten me?).
i like to use mini-dinstall for doing
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:12:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> > is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> > then running "compi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:12:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> > is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> > then running "compi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
hello.
> One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> then running "compileall.py" in the postinst. Would someone comment on
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
hello.
> One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> then running "compileall.py" in the postinst. Would someone comment on
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:23:37AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> I would be happy to sponsor kernel-patch-ck. I have taken a look at
> it and it is well done. Is there anything you want to update before I
> upload it?
no. thanks for taking the time.
--
gram
pgpJ343CWczTT.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:23:37AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> I would be happy to sponsor kernel-patch-ck. I have taken a look at
> it and it is well done. Is there anything you want to update before I
> upload it?
no. thanks for taking the time.
--
gram
msg07624/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:40:11PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
> [1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
>
> packages are available at:
>
> http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
>
&g
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:40:11PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
> [1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
>
> packages are available at:
>
> http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
>
&g
i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
[1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
packages are available at:
http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
which apt-getable.
[1] http://kernel.kolivas.net/
--
gram
pgp1enVOntwdG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
[1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
packages are available at:
http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
which apt-getable.
[1] http://kernel.kolivas.net/
--
gram
msg07537/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP sign
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:09:12PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
hello.
> There's 3 more library packages that aren't found by dpkg-shlibdeps. Am
are the extra libraries explicitly used by your program?
--
gram
pgpH4rsoZZmFX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:09:12PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
hello.
> There's 3 more library packages that aren't found by dpkg-shlibdeps. Am
are the extra libraries explicitly used by your program?
--
gram
msg07392/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:19:18AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 3.10.2002 1:26 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what, if any, local changes have you made to the source? could you
> > provide a diff between the debian version and your version
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:19:18AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 3.10.2002 1:26 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what, if any, local changes have you made to the source? could you
> > provide a diff between the debian version and your version
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:15:39AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
> > build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and -
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:15:39AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
> > build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and -
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> At the moment we are experimenting only with the Apache package and
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot etc.
>
> Do you by any chance know where I can specify in the 'rules' file
> where I would like the root directory to be?
do you mean w
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> At the moment we are experimenting only with the Apache package and
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot etc.
>
> Do you by any chance know where I can specify in the 'rules' file
> where I would like the root directory to be?
do you mean
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
