Re: Bug#521918: pbuilder --build --binary-arch invokes 'build' target

2009-05-11 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Filippo Rusconi wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you _must_ satisfy Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep: And pol

Re: Missing licenses in upstream source files

2009-03-20 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Ben Finney wrote: [note: quotations in random order] (We're now in ‘debian-legal’ territory; please follow up there.) Too often, though, such files are a set of license *terms* only (e.g. the text of the GPL), with no copyright status or explicit *grant* of license. That's not enough for Deb

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: how to had new services in /etc/services database? Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that. Hmm. Reading your and dato answers, it seems I wrote wrongly my mail. The

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Eric Cooper writes: What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but does not have a standard port number.) Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping /etc/inetd.conf to make sure it's n