RFS: snmpdump

net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/snmpdump/snmpdump_0.4.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Georgi Chulkov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

RFS: libanon

ool/main/l/libanon - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libanon/libanon_0.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Georgi Chulkov signature.asc D

Re: Native vs non-native - how to choose?

> >This should be called libnonsense_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz, so you'll have to > >repack the .bz2 (at least, for the time being, anyway) and fix its > >name (or make a symlink to it with the right name.) Indeed I only had to rename the source file. Using bzip2 didn't work, so evidently it has to be a

Native vs non-native - how to choose?

Hello, I have almost managed to package my first library. :) But one problem remains: "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot" always builds a native package. I would like to build a non-native one, but I don't know how. What I do currently is take the upstream archive ("libnonsense-0.1.0.tar.bz2"), ext

Re: Help needed for packaging a library

> > libnonsense-dev.install > > --- > > usr/include/* > > usr/lib/lib*.a > > usr/lib/lib*.so > > usr/lib/pkgconfig/* > > usr/lib/*.la > > It is IMHO a better idea to drop the libtool .la files. Please excuse my ignorance, but why is it better to drop them? > > usr/share/pkgcon

Help needed for packaging a library

m is deprecated. Please use 'date -R' instead. Maintainer name : Georgi Chulkov Email-Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:57:29 +0100 Package Name: libnonsense Version : 1.0 License : gpl Type of Package : Library Hit to confirm: Done. Ple