Re: [RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-03 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:38:58 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Saturday 02 October 2004 21:25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, George Danchev wrote: > > > Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to > > > disk(partition) copying where dd is just

Re: [RFS]: pcopy - a replacement for dd

2004-10-03 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:38:58 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Saturday 02 October 2004 21:25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Oct 2004, George Danchev wrote: > > > Desc: Pcopy is intended to be used when doing large disk(partition) to > > > disk(partition) copying where dd is just

Re: UTF-8 in copyright files?

2003-12-19 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:29:59 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 18:44, Joel Baker wrote: > > > Is it valid to use UTF-8 in the debian/copyright file? (Specifically, it > > is possibly to accurately reproduce a copyright symbol, using UTF-8, which > > would be a nice thing to

Re: UTF-8 in copyright files?

2003-12-19 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:29:59 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 18:44, Joel Baker wrote: > > > Is it valid to use UTF-8 in the debian/copyright file? (Specifically, it > > is possibly to accurately reproduce a copyright symbol, using UTF-8, which > > would be a nice thing to

Re: ulog-acctd not entering testing -- help sought

2003-04-30 Thread GOTO Masanori
At 29 Apr 2003 17:58:26 +0200, Michel D�nzer wrote: > On Die, 2003-04-29 at 16:31, Hilko Bengen wrote: > > As the maintainer of ulog-acctd, I am facing the problem that the > > latest version is not passed into testing because it is not built on > > all architectures that it used to be built on. I