Bug#864271: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#864271: RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]

dd the changelog entry with a patch - grrr! Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

and, small transitions are still possible, that doesn't affect too many packages. But to be honest, the 3.0 transition was big enough and still not finished (see the kFreeBSD build problems). I do _not_ want to risk having more problems with 3.1 so close to the full freeze. Regards, Laszlo/GCS PS: please don't Cc me, I'm subscribed to the list.

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

it is correct. So let's wait for maintainers' comments. Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff in some hours if you don't mind. Thanks for your contribution, Laszlo/GCS diff -Nru protobuf-3.0.0/debian/changelog protobuf-3.0.0/debian/changelog --- prot

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

t; looking for sponsor. I'll check it if I get home - if no one objects against the Python3 variant of ProtoBuf. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: wxsqlite3 is replaced? how do I find the new functionality?

ng more > efficiently). wxSQLite3 has a new upstream release, but it should be basically the same from the packagers view. I can upload it to unstable anytime without conflicting it with the ones for wxWidgetx 2.8 . Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@li

Bug#721011: zbackup 1.2-1 sponsoring

build gave error exit status 2 debuild: fatal error at line 1361: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc failed -- cut -- Please make it buildable first. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Bug# 238314 RFS: siefs - virtual fs for accessing Siemens mobiles

then to send the patch upstream. This would be the best, you are right. Regards, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

echo+newline in postinst

t seems to work in every shell. Is it ok, or should I use an other solution? Like '(echo; echo line) >>config_file'? Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Bug# 238314 RFS: siefs - virtual fs for accessing Siemens mobiles

then to send the patch upstream. This would be the best, you are right. Regards, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

echo+newline in postinst

t seems to work in every shell. Is it ok, or should I use an other solution? Like '(echo; echo line) >>config_file'? Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

haydn issues/login

und key in /home/gcs/.ssh/known_hosts:11 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that ca

haydn issues/login

y in /home/gcs/.ssh/known_hosts:11 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue:

Re: How to get rid of an epoch?

me has to be changed as well and thus epoch can be forgotten. - Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: How to get rid of an epoch?

me has to be changed as well and thus epoch can be forgotten. - Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFC: crasm

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 13:17:10 +1000]: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > >[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/ > > debian/copyright is missing the following line

Re: RFC: crasm

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 13:17:10 +1000]: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > >[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/ > > debian/copyright is missing the following line

Re: RFH: strange message after package upload

md5sum was not correct, etc. All in all uploding sidplay-libs 2.1.0-3 failed. > Which is a package you are taking over from ivo. Yes, and? It should not generate that warning. > Sorry for the noise. No problem, I am just curious why the uploading failed. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sidplay-libs, sidplay

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 12:13:26 +1000]: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sidplay-libs/ > > sidplay-libs_2.1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn&#x

Re: RFH: strange message after package upload

md5sum was not correct, etc. All in all uploding sidplay-libs 2.1.0-3 failed. > Which is a package you are taking over from ivo. Yes, and? It should not generate that warning. > Sorry for the noise. No problem, I am just curious why the uploading failed. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sidplay-libs, sidplay

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 12:13:26 +1000]: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sidplay-libs/ > > sidplay-libs_2.1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn&#x

Re: Sponsor for a new package

se that are granted in conjunction with the Debian system. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html

RFS: sidplay-libs, sidplay

build the package to include the changes from 2.1.0-3 (ie with debuild -v2.1.0-2), as it was uploaded, but not processed because my previous sponsor (Algernon, on holiday now) had several problems ranging from bad gpg signature on .changes to strange warning messages. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Sponsor for a new package

se that are granted in conjunction with the Debian system. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: sidplay-libs, sidplay

build the package to include the changes from 2.1.0-3 (ie with debuild -v2.1.0-2), as it was uploaded, but not processed because my previous sponsor (Algernon, on holiday now) had several problems ranging from bad gpg signature on .changes to strange warning messages. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS

Re: library packaging problem

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]: > Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly > trivial) error? Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard time guessing. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: library packaging problem

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 18:16:20 +0200]: > Could anyone give me a hint where I have to look to find my (certainly trivial) > error? Can we look into the package's source? Without checking we have a hard time guessing. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To U

Re: xpat2 testing excuses

ebian.org/xpat2 I look for a broader number of packages, so p.qa.d.o would be good to get back fully. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

RFH: strange message after package upload

, only with two of them. Thanks for any hints in advance, Laszlo/GCS

Re: xpat2 testing excuses

ebian.org/xpat2 I look for a broader number of packages, so p.qa.d.o would be good to get back fully. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFH: strange message after package upload

, only with two of them. Thanks for any hints in advance, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFD: take over packages

* Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-22 09:54:58 -0400]: > If Ivo gave you explicit permission to do this and isn't responding, > you are within your right to ask someone else to sponsor the uploads, Thanks, I did this meanwhile. > but you should keep Ivo in the loop. Well, my sponsor

Re: RFD: take over packages

* Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-22 09:54:58 -0400]: > If Ivo gave you explicit permission to do this and isn't responding, > you are within your right to ask someone else to sponsor the uploads, Thanks, I did this meanwhile. > but you should keep Ivo in the loop. Well, my sponsor

RFD: take over packages

just see that the packages are not fixed for Sarge. :( What do mentors think about this? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFD: take over packages

just see that the packages are not fixed for Sarge. :( What do mentors think about this? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC: crasm

mentors.debian.net[1]. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/

Re: xpat2 testing excuses

* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-18 16:54:27 +0200]: > The testing scripts did not run succesfully tonight. Any expected date when they will be fixed? It seems they are still broken, at least I do not see packages.qa.debian.org updating. Regards, Laszlo

RFC: crasm

mentors.debian.net[1]. Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crasm/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xpat2 testing excuses

* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-18 16:54:27 +0200]: > The testing scripts did not run succesfully tonight. Any expected date when they will be fixed? It seems they are still broken, at least I do not see packages.qa.debian.org updating. Regards, Laszlo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: working with Debian subversion sources

, or not to crush with the Apache2 libapr0. Regards, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: working with Debian subversion sources

, or not to crush with the Apache2 libapr0. Regards, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFH: gradm2

Hi, I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft. Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- BorsodChem

RFH: gradm2

Hi, I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft. Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It was newly uploaded last month, and more than two weeks passed since then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- BorsodChem

Re: Problem with zombie directory created on package install

's empty "nouvola" directory > created as well. It's part of the .deb . > I am recently unable to find out > the reason it appears here. Any suggestions what > did I do wrong? Bad shots: you have listed it in debian/dirs or the install target creates it. More if you make the source available. Laszlo/GCS

Re: Problem with zombie directory created on package install

's empty "nouvola" directory > created as well. It's part of the .deb . > I am recently unable to find out > the reason it appears here. Any suggestions what > did I do wrong? Bad shots: you have listed it in debian/dirs or the install target creates it. More if yo

how buildd's work?

to build, but subversion is tried? If I would be a Debian Developer, what I could do to resolve such situations (I mean for example to force the apache2 build)? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Tux Commander & Borland Kylix

t in free tools ofcourse. I have already tried it to package it for Debian. It seems to be a no-go. > a lot of the problems you will face with this are problems that java folks > (prior to the recent availability of high-quality free JVMs) have faced in > debian. Exactly. Maybe even harder. Laszlo/GCS

how buildd's work?

to build, but subversion is tried? If I would be a Debian Developer, what I could do to resolve such situations (I mean for example to force the apache2 build)? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tux Commander & Borland Kylix

t in free tools ofcourse. I have already tried it to package it for Debian. It seems to be a no-go. > a lot of the problems you will face with this are problems that java folks > (prior to the recent availability of high-quality free JVMs) have faced in > debian. Exactly. Maybe even hard

security fix dependency

not? - how should I change the version numbering? If I use the new upstream version, then lintian correctly see that as I am not in the Uploaders field, the packaging is an NMU but with wrong version number... Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

security fix dependency

not? - how should I change the version numbering? If I use the new upstream version, then lintian correctly see that as I am not in the Uploaders field, the packaging is an NMU but with wrong version number... Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Python package status

gain. Also, now I install package modules under /usr/lib/site-python instead of /usr/local/lib/python${PYTHON_VER}/site-packages . Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Python package status

gain. Also, now I install package modules under /usr/lib/site-python instead of /usr/local/lib/python${PYTHON_VER}/site-packages . Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: packages.qa.d.o bug?

ecause it is blocked by perl at the end; the problem is that p.q.d.o still shows version 0.0.1173 in "Testing Status", and not see the new, 0.1263 version. It should show "* 4 days old (needs 10 days); * Too young, not considered." as 0.1263 was uploaded on 2004-07-19. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

packages.qa.d.o bug?

x27; bugs in BTS does not show anything relevant. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- BorsodChem Joint-Stock Company Linux Support Center Software engineer Developer +36-48-511211/12-99 +36-20-4441745

Re: packages.qa.d.o bug?

ecause it is blocked by perl at the end; the problem is that p.q.d.o still shows version 0.0.1173 in "Testing Status", and not see the new, 0.1263 version. It should show "* 4 days old (needs 10 days); * Too young, not considered." as 0.1263 was uploaded on 2004-07-19. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

packages.qa.d.o bug?

x27; bugs in BTS does not show anything relevant. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- BorsodChem Joint-Stock Company Linux Support Center Software engineer Developer +36-48-511211/12-99 +36-20-4441745 -- T

Python package status

e for any pointers, Laszlo/GCS

Python package status

e for any pointers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: I need sponsor for bif3

* Sergio Cayuqueo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 22:51:21 -0300]: > deb http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/ ./ > http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/bif3_0.3.11_all.deb > the original (orig) tgz file is > http://bif.lunix.com.ar/tgz/bif3-0.3.11.tgz Your package fails for the first look. :( Please split out

Re: Looking for Mentor

please see: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: I need sponsor for bif3

* Sergio Cayuqueo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 22:51:21 -0300]: > deb http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/ ./ > http://bif.lunix.com.ar/deb/bif3_0.3.11_all.deb > the original (orig) tgz file is > http://bif.lunix.com.ar/tgz/bif3-0.3.11.tgz Your package fails for the first look. :( Please split out

Re: Looking for Mentor

please see: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dh_installman

r/man/zoneserver.8 > > The file is doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 in the tarball and you want it to > be installed into the correct location, i.e. > /usr/share/man/fr/man8/zoneserver.8? Not exactly he wants doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 to be installed as zoneserver.fr.8 (notice the added 'fr' tag in the filename). Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Re: dh_installman

er.fr.8 > Although the actual file is: > doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 Do an 'install' on the manpage, directly to the package directory (debian/tmp or debian/maradns whatever do you use). > Btw I have informed upstream That's good. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Re: dh_installman

r/man/zoneserver.8 > > The file is doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 in the tarball and you want it to > be installed into the correct location, i.e. > /usr/share/man/fr/man8/zoneserver.8? Not exactly he wants doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 to be installed as zoneserver.fr.8 (notice the added &

Re: dh_installman

er.fr.8 > Although the actual file is: > doc/fr/man/zoneserver.8 Do an 'install' on the manpage, directly to the package directory (debian/tmp or debian/maradns whatever do you use). > Btw I have informed upstream That's good. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: device creation for udev

ven when using udev > there is a bug somewhere, either in udev or in the kernel-patch. It is a missing feature only, the grsec device is very uncommon, and only gradm2 and kernel-patch-grsecurity2 packages will need it. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

Re: device creation for udev

* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]: > On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is > > ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how

Re: device creation for udev

ven when using udev > there is a bug somewhere, either in udev or in the kernel-patch. It is a missing feature only, the grsec device is very uncommon, and only gradm2 and kernel-patch-grsecurity2 packages will need it. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: device creation for udev

* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]: > On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is > > ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how

device creation for udev

do it. Can someone help me out here? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS

device creation for udev

do it. Can someone help me out here? Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

;s choice (stable, -pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: RFS: cc65 - Cross development suite for 65xxx processors

f no one volunteers until then, my first move will be to sponsor this package. _Seriously_. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

;s choice (stable, -pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: cc65 - Cross development suite for 65xxx processors

f no one volunteers until then, my first move will be to sponsor this package. _Seriously_. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mozilla locale packages

the pool, after the next mirror pulse (~ 23h CET). Ofcourse you are right, they are almost similar to each other. Please notify Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when your package is ready and in the pool, so he can add autochoose support for it. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

owner. But Dan is the one who filed the ITP in the first place, and Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it. As I see Dan already corrected it. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

Hi Colin, Rene, * Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]: > Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should s

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

idea. > >>I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and > >>ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read > > Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename. ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one. Che

Re: Packaging question

it as a last resort, only if the 'make install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got the idea. Hope this helps, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Mozilla locale packages

the pool, after the next mirror pulse (~ 23h CET). Ofcourse you are right, they are almost similar to each other. Please notify Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> when your package is ready and in the pool, so he can add autochoose support for it. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

owner. But Dan is the one who filed the ITP in the first place, and Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it. As I see Dan already corrected it. Cheers, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

Hi Colin, Rene, * Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]: > Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should s

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

idea. > >>I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and > >>ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read > > Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename. ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one. Che

Re: Packaging question

it as a last resort, only if the 'make install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got the idea. Hope this helps, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

format, different type arg (arg 3) [...] gnome-ppp-main.c: In function `main': gnome-ppp-main.c:34: warning: statement with no effect - (ITP the package, so others will know it's being packaged). After fixing the first two, write a RFS mail to here, hope you will find a sponsor soon. Gotta go catch some sleep, Laszlo/GCS

Re: disk full on m.d.o?

ched? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no answer yet. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

close it in debian/changelog etc... Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

format, different type arg (arg 3) [...] gnome-ppp-main.c: In function `main': gnome-ppp-main.c:34: warning: statement with no effect - (ITP the package, so others will know it's being packaged). After fixing the first two, write a RFS mail to here, hope you will find a sponsor soon.

Re: disk full on m.d.o?

ched? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no answer yet. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

have any web space to place my stuff > to. Especiall anonymous FTP server access. I can send all stuff to you > if you want. ;) Or tell me where I can upload some files for free. Take a look at mentors.debian.net ; and please don't take personal, but *.ru domains are usually very slow. :( Cheers, Laszlo/GCS

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

close it in debian/changelog etc... Cheers, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

have any web space to place my stuff > to. Especiall anonymous FTP server access. I can send all stuff to you > if you want. ;) Or tell me where I can upload some files for free. Take a look at mentors.debian.net ; and please don't take personal, but *.ru domains are usually very slow. :(

disk full on m.d.o?

be related to my system, but I think it's more likely that the hdd on mentors.d.o is full. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

disk full on m.d.o?

be related to my system, but I think it's more likely that the hdd on mentors.d.o is full. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: sigrot: rotates ~/.signature on every run

upstream maintainer. I agree with your justification. I withdraw the RFS and will retitle the bug back to O today. Please ask for it's removal from the pool. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: sigrot: rotates ~/.signature on every run

upstream maintainer. I agree with your justification. I withdraw the RFS and will retitle the bug back to O today. Please ask for it's removal from the pool. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: apt-src -- manage Debian source packages

ns, this is a way to do that. The package is available from: deb http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free Thanks in advance for any offers, Laszlo/GCS

RFS: sigrot: rotates ~/.signature on every run

ontrib non-free deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free Thanks in advance, Laszlo/GCS

  1   2   3   >