Re: FTBFS due to upgrade/bug in build-dependency

Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 11/01/2008, Frank Terbeck wrote: [...] > > If not, what would be an appropriate close message to send once the > > bug in tdb-dev is closed? > > You could use a versioned Build-Depends: package (>= fixed-version) and > s

Re: FTBFS due to upgrade/bug in build-dependency

Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 10/01/2008, Frank Terbeck wrote: [...] > > My question is, if it would be the right thing to do is to reassign > > the bug to tdb-dev and add a comment about signal.h to it? Or should I > > rather create a new bug agains

FTBFS due to upgrade/bug in build-dependency

Hi list, I received #456871. This happens since tdb-dev was upgraded from '1.1.0-1+b1' to '1.1.1~svn26294-1', because 'usr/include/tdb.h' uses 'sig_atomic_t' without including . I could work around that problem quite simply. However, I think it would be preferable, if 'tdb.h' would be fixed. My

Re: How to write a good manpage ?

Marco Bertorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > How can I write a manpage good for debian? Branden Robinson held a talk about writing manuals for debian at debconf5. Here is a link to the corresponding video: