On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:41:18PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061108 21:01]:
>
> > I need to add a binary file (a png icon) to my package. What is the best
> > way to do this, since the "normal" .d
Hi,
I need to add a binary file (a png icon) to my package. What is the best
way to do this, since the "normal" .diff generation does not support
this ?
Frank
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you ar
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:02:26PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > DevRef suggests README.Debian-source for information about how a
> > nonpristine sourceball is repacked; you could use that, or borrow the
> > naming convention.
>
> That seems like a r
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 12:15:54AM +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Am Freitag 28 April 2006 23:53 schrieb Frank Gevaerts:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:47:46PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > Hi Frank,
> > >
> > > Isn't debian/README.Debian the one yo
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:47:46PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Isn't debian/README.Debian the one you would like to edit?
It might be. However, the included information is (probably) not useful
to end users.
Frank
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Frank Gevaerts
Hi,
I'm currently updating the foobillard package. I'd like to include a
file explaining how I work with the package. Is there a consensus about
how such a file should be named ?
Frank
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cl
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:25:59AM +0100, Tilman Koschnick wrote:
> When looking at the existing names, I noticed that there are no package
> names with only two characters, and not that many with three.
except for : af an at bb bc bl cu cw dc di dx ed ee es fv gb gq gs gv hf
ht hx im kq le lv m4
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
> > > Second, why can't I create packages with standard unix commands? Why
> > > can't I say something like:
> > > $ tar cvzf data.tgz myapplication/*
> > > $ tar czvf control.tgz control
> > > $ tar czvf mypackage-0.1.deb data.tgz
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
> > > Second, why can't I create packages with standard unix commands? Why
> > > can't I say something like:
> > > $ tar cvzf data.tgz myapplication/*
> > > $ tar czvf control.tgz control
> > > $ tar czvf mypackage-0.1.deb data.tgz
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:01:42PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Thanks. Is there some documentation available about interpreting buildd
> > status ?
> >
> > Frank
>
> Try http://www.buil
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:01:42PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Thanks. Is there some documentation available about interpreting buildd
> > status ?
> >
> > Frank
>
> Try http://www.buil
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 08:06:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > foobillard is out of date on s390. The first build attempt failed on
> > 04/04, because of missing libsdl1.2-dev. AFAICS, libsdl
Hi,
foobillard is out of date on s390. The first build attempt failed on
04/04, because of missing libsdl1.2-dev. AFAICS, libsdl1.2-dev is again
available since 08/04, but foobillard has not yet been rebuilt.
How long should I wait before contacting someone to do something, and who
should I contac
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 08:06:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > foobillard is out of date on s390. The first build attempt failed on
> > 04/04, because of missing libsdl1.2-dev. AFAICS, libsdl
Hi,
foobillard is out of date on s390. The first build attempt failed on
04/04, because of missing libsdl1.2-dev. AFAICS, libsdl1.2-dev is again
available since 08/04, but foobillard has not yet been rebuilt.
How long should I wait before contacting someone to do something, and who
should I contac
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:57:18PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 07:02:05PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > I have found pbuilder to be a great way to avoid this as well as other
> > build time side effects.
> I teste
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:57:18PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 07:02:05PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > I have found pbuilder to be a great way to avoid this as well as other
> > build time side effects.
> I teste
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:01:05PM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> > if a program license restricts usage to e.g. non-commercial use only,
> > will this (usually) disqualify a package from inclusion into non-free?
>
> DFSG (http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html)
> 6. No Discrimination Against
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:01:05PM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> > if a program license restricts usage to e.g. non-commercial use only,
> > will this (usually) disqualify a package from inclusion into non-free?
>
> DFSG (http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html)
> 6. No Discrimination Against
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:26:43PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > can anyone tell me what is the problem with foobillard on mips and
> > mipsel ?
>
> The mips and mipsel buildds are the only two (AFAIK) buildds
Hi,
can anyone tell me what is the problem with foobillard on mips and
mipsel ?
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=foobillard&ver=2.4-4&arch=mips&stamp=1045837775&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=foobillard&ver=2.4-4&arch=mipsel&stamp=1045769689&file=log&as=raw
Both fa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:26:43PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > can anyone tell me what is the problem with foobillard on mips and
> > mipsel ?
>
> The mips and mipsel buildds are the only two (AFAIK) buildds
Hi,
can anyone tell me what is the problem with foobillard on mips and
mipsel ?
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=foobillard&ver=2.4-4&arch=mips&stamp=1045837775&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=foobillard&ver=2.4-4&arch=mipsel&stamp=1045769689&file=log&as=raw
Both fa
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:23:39PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Frank!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > Makefile.am now says
> [...]
> > CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS}
> > ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} `
>
> > What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably
> >
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Leo "Costela" Antunes wrote:
> >>from debian/rules, or configure ?
> > if
> In particular, in debian/rules you could do (the first line probably already
> being present from dh_m
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:11:52PM -0200, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> On Seg, 2003-02-03 at 16:40, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS}
> > ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} `
> >
> > What do I have to change to be able to add
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:23:39PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Frank!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > Makefile.am now says
> [...]
> > CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} `
>
> > What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha, preferably
> > from
Hi,
the foobillard Makefile.am contains hardcoded CFLAGS. I need to change
them for foobillard to work on alpha. Can anyone help me with this ?
The problem is that I don't really know where the default should be set.
Makefile.am now says
if USE_BUMPREF
BUMPREF_CFLAGS =
else
BUMPREF_CFLAGS = -DN
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Leo "Costela" Antunes wrote:
> >>from debian/rules, or configure ?
> > if
> In particular, in debian/rules you could do (the first line probably already
> being present from dh_m
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:11:52PM -0200, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> On Seg, 2003-02-03 at 16:40, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > CFLAGS = -Wall -O3 `freetype-config --cflags` ${SDL_CFLAGS} ${BUMPREF_CFLAGS} `
> >
> > What do I have to change to be able to add -mieee on alpha
Hi,
the foobillard Makefile.am contains hardcoded CFLAGS. I need to change
them for foobillard to work on alpha. Can anyone help me with this ?
The problem is that I don't really know where the default should be set.
Makefile.am now says
if USE_BUMPREF
BUMPREF_CFLAGS =
else
BUMPREF_CFLAGS = -DN
Hi,
Should changelog.Debian include changes that precede the inclusion
in Debian ?
Frank
Hi,
Should changelog.Debian include changes that precede the inclusion
in Debian ?
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> I just noticed foobillard 2.4 has been released, so I will update my
> packages sometime today.
They are up to date now:
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/i386 ./
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/p
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> I just noticed foobillard 2.4 has been released, so I will update my
> packages sometime today.
They are up to date now:
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/i386 ./
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/p
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 02:31:54AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
>
> it's great that you're packaging foobillard. What kind of powerpc box do
> you have? In case it's one with a Radeon chip with an R100 core and a
> TCL unit, and you're using my dri-trunk packages,
I have an iboo
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 02:31:54AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
>
> it's great that you're packaging foobillard. What kind of powerpc box do
> you have? In case it's one with a Radeon chip with an R100 core and a
> TCL unit, and you're using my dri-trunk packages,
I have an iboo
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 07:44:43PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:30:39PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> [ how to satisfy the dependencies of the fonts ]
> > I didn't try
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 07:44:43PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:30:39PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> [ how to satisfy the dependencies of the fonts ]
> > I didn't try
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ah, seems you've implemented your option (d) already. Good.
>
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts |
> > >
Hi,
My foobillard package should now be ready for public consumption,
so I would be grateful if someone would want to sponsor them.
The packages (source,i386 and powerpc) are available at:
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/powerpc ./
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/i386
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:12:20PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
> > debian.
>
> Looks nice.
>
> > a foobillard goes to non-free
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ah, seems you've implemented your option (d) already. Good.
>
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-
Hi,
My foobillard package should now be ready for public consumption,
so I would be grateful if someone would want to sponsor them.
The packages (source,i386 and powerpc) are available at:
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/powerpc ./
deb http://www.xs4all.be/~gevaerts/debian/bin/i386
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:12:20PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
> > debian.
>
> Looks nice.
>
> > a foobillard goes to non-free
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:32:40PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts |
> > > ttf-larabie-deco
> >
> > That is indeed the same thing. T
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:32:40PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-deco
> >
> > That is indeed the same thing. This means my ori
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:07:51PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote:
> It seems to me that the fonts included with foobilliard aren't _exactly_
> non-free, but perhaps debian-legal should look over the license to make a
> final decision on the DFSG-ness of the fonts; I might be wrong, but a
> cursory glance
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:50:19PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:22:09PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
> > or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
> >
Hi,
The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
express this in the Depends: field ?
Frank
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:07:51PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote:
> It seems to me that the fonts included with foobilliard aren't _exactly_
> non-free, but perhaps debian-legal should look over the license to make a
> final decision on the DFSG-ness of the fonts; I might be wrong, but a
> cursory glance
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:50:19PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:22:09PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
> > or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
> >
Hi,
The foobillard package I am building will require either ttf-freefonts
or (ttf-larabie-straight and ttf-larabie-deco). Is there a way to
express this in the Depends: field ?
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
debian. I have the following problems :
- I am not a DD, so I will need a sponsor (or the package will have to
remain unofficial)
- foobillard is GPL, but is distributed with 3 non-free fonts (larabie).
This means that e
Hi,
I'm trying to package foobillard (http://foobillard.sunsite.dk/) for
debian. I have the following problems :
- I am not a DD, so I will need a sponsor (or the package will have to
remain unofficial)
- foobillard is GPL, but is distributed with 3 non-free fonts (larabie).
This means that e
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:06:50PM +0100, Yven Leist wrote:
> On Saturday 04 January 2003 02:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > It was 2003-01-03 22:55 when Yven Leist wrote:
> > > > from package - only 24 colors for icon is too small.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know the reason for this limitation? I'v
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:06:50PM +0100, Yven Leist wrote:
> On Saturday 04 January 2003 02:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > It was 2003-01-03 22:55 when Yven Leist wrote:
> > > > from package - only 24 colors for icon is too small.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know the reason for this limitation? I'v
57 matches
Mail list logo
