On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi again
Faheem Mitha writes:
Could one just use upstream binaries instead? CCL has upstream
binaries available, which I use to initially build my Debian package,
for at least i386 and amd64. My package currently does not attempt to
build on
X-Debbugs-CC: Peter Van Eynde , Christoph Egger
, openmcl-de...@clozure.com,
pkg-common-lisp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Faheem Mitha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ccl"
* Package name: ccl
and pkg-common-lisp-devel@
is -- it appears -- not getting enough of my attention to see your
messages in time.
Ok, I'll do that.
Faheem Mitha writes:
1) I'd like to take over the outstanding ITP for CCL (#609047,
cc'd). I've written to Darren Ho, the creator of th
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:45:44 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Or the mingw-w64 gcc crosscompiler, which has documented it's bootstrap:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=3Dcollab-maint/gcc-mingw-w64.git;a=3D=
> blob;f=3Ddebian/README.source;h=3D697d003e76d9afe20a40556bc619cc5e30a3c0e=
> d;hb
8, The Fungi wrote:
>> On 2012-07-17 11:38:32 +0530 (+0530), Faheem Mitha wrote:
>> [...]
>>> CCL requires itself to build. Since it is not currently in the
>>> Debian archive, that raises the question of how this should
>>> happen.
>> [...]
>&g
Hi,
Please CC replies to my email address. Thanks.
I have put my preliminary packaging of CCL on Bitbucket as a Mercurial
repository, located at https://bitbucket.org/faheem/ccl-debian-tmp
Please test and report problem and suggest improvements. For
preference, open an issue.
This packaging is
Hi,
I've run into a technical issue with packaging CCL, which I describe
below. I don't know whether debian-mentors or debian-devel is a more
appropriate forum to post this - please advise if mentors is
inappropriate.
CCL was once in Debian, but under a different name, namely openmcl. I
be
Hi,
I'm trying to build mercurial 1.3.1 on etch from the unstable sources, and
I think I'm close. I'm currently getting
fah...@etch:/usr/local/src/mercurial/mercurial-1.3.1/debian$ debuild binary
dh --with quilt binary
dh_install --with quilt
cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/debian/tmp/usr/lib'
Dear People,
I've tried my hand at building Subversion 1.1.0-rc2 packages. I've
imitated the packaging of the official Debian packages as far as possible.
Whenever possible I applied the Debian patches. However, since I don't
understand exactly what I am doing, I suppose some breakage was
in
Dear People,
I've tried my hand at building Subversion 1.1.0-rc2 packages. I've
imitated the packaging of the official Debian packages as far as possible.
Whenever possible I applied the Debian patches. However, since I don't
understand exactly what I am doing, I suppose some breakage was
inevi
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> * Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
>
> > > I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
> I think David already started with it, as we got a request for th
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> * Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-17 01:12:46 +]:
>
> > > I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2,
> I think David already started with it, as we got a request for th
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:24:42 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
> some difficulties, and
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:24:42 -0400 (EDT), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
> some difficulties, and
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run
> into some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would he
Dear People,
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me out.
I should probably start by saying that I'm trying to use svn-build
Dear People,
I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run into
some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would help me out.
I should probably start by saying that I'm trying to use svn-build
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear People,
>
> I've been trying to package subversion, version 1.1.0-rc2, using the
> already packaged versions as a jumping-off point. However, I have run
> into some difficulties, and was hoping people on this list would he
18 matches
Mail list logo
