Hi!
I'm looking for someone to test and upload a kdiff3 package again.
I maintain kdiff3 packages for many months now and improved the
application by providing a man page and fixing a race condition.
It's already part of Sid and Sarge.
kdiff3 is a graphical diff. I think the most useful differenc
Andreas Metzler schrieb:
> -- Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 15 Jun 2004
> 11:28:59 +0200
> ^^^
That's strange, I'm seeing a wrong mail address in
the changelog, but it is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"...
Anyway, I changed it and uploaded again.
(Should I change the version
Hello!
I maintain the kdiff3 package for many months now.
I wrote a man page and solved an unreproducible bug.
My changes where included in upstream.
It is already included in Sarge, but my former sponsor
is not reachable for me. So I'm looking for a new sponsor
(and hopefully mentor). The new
Andreas Metzler schrieb:
> -- Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 15 Jun 2004
> 11:28:59 +0200
> ^^^
That's strange, I'm seeing a wrong mail address in
the changelog, but it is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"...
Anyway, I changed it and uploaded again.
(Should I change the version
Hello!
I maintain the kdiff3 package for many months now.
I wrote a man page and solved an unreproducible bug.
My changes where included in upstream.
It is already included in Sarge, but my former sponsor
is not reachable for me. So I'm looking for a new sponsor
(and hopefully mentor). The new
Eduard Bloch schrieb:
> I am not sure how to implement this policy for su-replacements... Best
> virtual package name? id-changer and x-id-changer? Or uid-changer?
uid-changer/x-uid-changer
There are many IDs out there...
Ciao,
Eike
Eduard Bloch schrieb:
> I am not sure how to implement this policy for su-replacements... Best
> virtual package name? id-changer and x-id-changer? Or uid-changer?
uid-changer/x-uid-changer
There are many IDs out there...
Ciao,
Eike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
David A. Riggs schrieb:
> The real question:
>
> > So, my question is...is there, or should there be, some virtual
> > package or system-wide or user-wide preference for gaining root
> > priviliges under X11? What's the best current way to get this
> > into the menu system with the least amoun
David A. Riggs schrieb:
> The real question:
>
> > So, my question is...is there, or should there be, some virtual
> > package or system-wide or user-wide preference for gaining root
> > priviliges under X11? What's the best current way to get this
> > into the menu system with the least amoun
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb:
> There is also "ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -X foobar".
...and kdesu...
Ciao,
Eike
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb:
> There is also "ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -X foobar".
...and kdesu...
Ciao,
Eike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following is still vaild - it's just version 0.9.84 now,
where the other (among other changes) included my fix for a
race condition that led to crashes.
Eike "zyro" Sauer schrieb:
> I'm looking for someone to sponsor kdiff3 again. The former versions
> have already
The following is still vaild - it's just version 0.9.84 now,
where the other (among other changes) included my fix for a
race condition that led to crashes.
Eike "zyro" Sauer schrieb:
> I'm looking for someone to sponsor kdiff3 again. The former versions
> have already
Dale K. Hawkins schrieb:
> I have written a (useful?) script to find all packages which have not be
> used for a long time and reports this to the user (i.e., some package is
> installed but none of its files have been accessed in 60 days). Would
> this be useful? Is there some other forum where
Dale K. Hawkins schrieb:
> I have written a (useful?) script to find all packages which have not be
> used for a long time and reports this to the user (i.e., some package is
> installed but none of its files have been accessed in 60 days). Would
> this be useful? Is there some other forum where
Hello!
I'm looking for someone to sponsor kdiff3 again. The former versions
have already been tested and sponsored by Rene Engelhard, so the
package should be in good shape. Upstream is very responsive.
kdiff3 is contained in sarge. I'd like to apply as DD in future.
kdiff3 is a graphical diff
Hello!
I'm looking for someone to sponsor kdiff3 again. The former versions
have already been tested and sponsored by Rene Engelhard, so the
package should be in good shape. Upstream is very responsive.
kdiff3 is contained in sarge. I'd like to apply as DD in future.
kdiff3 is a graphical diff
Stephan Brendel schrieb:
> Here is the flyer
You could add some pictures, preferably in uncompressed BMP format.
Ciao,
Eike
Stephan Brendel schrieb:
> Here is the flyer
You could add some pictures, preferably in uncompressed BMP format.
Ciao,
Eike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I think you shouldn't mail this to me personally
as well as to the list without notification,
I just answered this by private mail.)
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2004 05:50 schrieben Sie:
> You have an old theme package installed, you need
> bootsplash-theme-debian-tux
No, I don't. I purged every t
(I think you shouldn't mail this to me personally
as well as to the list without notification,
I just answered this by private mail.)
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2004 05:50 schrieben Sie:
> You have an old theme package installed, you need
> bootsplash-theme-debian-tux
No, I don't. I purged every t
Matthew A. Nicholson schrieb:
> I just uploaded new bootsplash debs, containing bug fixes and patches for
> the latest stable kernels. I need them tested by the people who were
> getting that "debconf exited with status 10" or something error.
Ok...
export LC_ALL=en_EN
export DEBCONF_DEBUG=develo
Matthew A. Nicholson schrieb:
> I just uploaded new bootsplash debs, containing bug fixes and patches for
> the latest stable kernels. I need them tested by the people who were
> getting that "debconf exited with status 10" or something error.
Ok...
export LC_ALL=en_EN
export DEBCONF_DEBUG=develo
Matthew A. Nicholson schrieb:
> I am still looking for a sponsor for my bootsplash package set.
I am still looking for a remedy for the following error:
root:/home/eike# export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer; dpkg -i
bootsplash_3.0.7-7_i386.deb bootsplash-theme-linux_3.0.0-3_i386.deb
Selecting previousl
Matthew A. Nicholson schrieb:
> I am still looking for a sponsor for my bootsplash package set.
I am still looking for a remedy for the following error:
root:/home/eike# export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer; dpkg -i
bootsplash_3.0.7-7_i386.deb bootsplash-theme-linux_3.0.0-3_i386.deb
Selecting previousl
Matthew Palmer schrieb:
> I have no particular need for a software binary clock, though, as I've got
> a breadboard of LEDs doing the job for me.
Are you going to package it? ;o)
Ciao,
Eike
Matthew Palmer schrieb:
> I have no particular need for a software binary clock, though, as I've got
> a breadboard of LEDs doing the job for me.
Are you going to package it? ;o)
Ciao,
Eike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
>the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
>think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
Is this consensus?
I thought I'd get rid of everything a packa
Raphael Goulais schrieb:
> - Why do you remove /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb.log at postrm, since
>the log files are in /var/log/cvs-autoreleasedeb/ ? Also, I don't
>think you should remove the log files anyway, even on a purge.
Is this consensus?
I thought I'd get rid of everything a packa
Paul Cupis schrieb:
> Have I missed something? Can you try removing the referenced code from
> debian/rules and seeing if the resulting package is "correct"?
I'm sure I had a compelling reason to do this some day
- but I can't remember it. And the package seems to be fine
with all those lines rem
Paul Cupis schrieb:
> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/knights \
> kde_htmldir=$(CURDIR)/debian/knights/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML
Thanks, this made my rules file much more transparent.
But it worked "better" to use kde_htmldir=/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML.
Is there a similiar solution for
Paul Cupis schrieb:
> Have I missed something? Can you try removing the referenced code from
> debian/rules and seeing if the resulting package is "correct"?
I'm sure I had a compelling reason to do this some day
- but I can't remember it. And the package seems to be fine
with all those lines rem
Paul Cupis schrieb:
> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/knights \
> kde_htmldir=$(CURDIR)/debian/knights/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML
Thanks, this made my rules file much more transparent.
But it worked "better" to use kde_htmldir=/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML.
Is there a similiar solution for
Tommaso Moroni schrieb:
> Is there any way to convert the upstream docbook in a man page?
> I tried with docbook-to-man and docbook-utils but they both didn't work.
I think it has to be a docbook document explicitly meant to be converted
to a man page. Otherwise, you'll have to write a short one y
Tommaso Moroni schrieb:
> Is there any way to convert the upstream docbook in a man page?
> I tried with docbook-to-man and docbook-utils but they both didn't work.
I think it has to be a docbook document explicitly meant to be converted
to a man page. Otherwise, you'll have to write a short one y
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
> Thanks! But I still would need someone to approve my application :-)
I really think you should take some time and first talk to people
(as suggested) and then express your needs.
But i agree that it yould be much easier for a marketing guy
when he's part of the sto
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
> Thanks! But I still would need someone to approve my application :-)
I really think you should take some time and first talk to people
(as suggested) and then express your needs.
But i agree that it yould be much easier for a marketing guy
when he's part of the sto
Roland Gruber schrieb:
> So what should I do now? Wait some more time or look for a new sponsor?
> Maybe there somebody on this list who has good contacts to Matthew.
If you'd like to continue to work with Mathew, I guess you should have
sort of "interim sponsor" just for one package version.
Cia
Roland Gruber schrieb:
> So what should I do now? Wait some more time or look for a new sponsor?
> Maybe there somebody on this list who has good contacts to Matthew.
If you'd like to continue to work with Mathew, I guess you should have
sort of "interim sponsor" just for one package version.
Cia
Filippo Giunchedi schrieb:
>> W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
> yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz )
This error means that his version is _newer_ than the one
lintian expects. So this i
Filippo Giunchedi schrieb:
>> W: hatari source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
> yes you should update standards-version to the latest policy (see ls -la
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz )
This error means that his version is _newer_ than the one
lintian expects. So this i
Hello!
I'm still(*) looking for someone to test and upload the following package.
The diff file has become even smaller because upstream has accepted my
man page in his new version.
kdiff3 is a graphical diff. I think the most useful difference to many
other diff programs is that the difference
Hello!
I'm still(*) looking for someone to test and upload the following package.
The diff file has become even smaller because upstream has accepted my
man page in his new version.
kdiff3 is a graphical diff. I think the most useful difference to many
other diff programs is that the difference
Jess Mahan schrieb:
> I followed the Debian New Maintainers Giude to the tee, and when
> packagin, it doesnt seem to generate a diff or orig.tar.gz.
It should do that if you use dh_make -f ../originalpackage.tgz .
> I am packageing on woody/table, maybee this is the reason?
Do you use the uns
Jess Mahan schrieb:
> I followed the Debian New Maintainers Giude to the tee, and when
> packagin, it doesnt seem to generate a diff or orig.tar.gz.
It should do that if you use dh_make -f ../originalpackage.tgz .
> I am packageing on woody/table, maybee this is the reason?
Do you use the uns
Hi!
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> replied to him on -qt-kde where he posted that request too...
Sorry for the "faked crosspost", but news.gmane.org
won't let me crosspost neither with knode nor with tin
saying "441 - You are not allowed to approve postings".
In -qt-kde, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I had
Hi!
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> replied to him on -qt-kde where he posted that request too...
Sorry for the "faked crosspost", but news.gmane.org
won't let me crosspost neither with knode nor with tin
saying "441 - You are not allowed to approve postings".
In -qt-kde, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I had
Frank Küster schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show file-rc
I found this in a slashdot comment:
"Init Replacements: simpleinit [csiro.au], minit [www.fefe.de], jinit
[fremlin.de], runit, daemontools [cr.yp.to], serel [fastboot.org]. Progeny
[progeny.org] also has their own system based on
Frank Küster schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show file-rc
I found this in a slashdot comment:
"Init Replacements: simpleinit [csiro.au], minit [www.fefe.de], jinit
[fremlin.de], runit, daemontools [cr.yp.to], serel [fastboot.org]. Progeny
[progeny.org] also has their own system based on
Hello!
I'm still looking for someone to test and upload the following package.
Package name: kdiff3
Version : 0.9.71
URL : http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net
License : GPL
Description: compares and merges 2 or 3 files or directories
KDiff3 compares two or three input f
Hello!
I'm still looking for someone to test and upload the following package.
Package name: kdiff3
Version : 0.9.71
URL : http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net
License : GPL
Description: compares and merges 2 or 3 files or directories
KDiff3 compares two or three input f
Hello!
Zenaan Harkness schrieb:
> I guess I
> need to read the man pages to grok the difference there again too.
Yes. :o)
> Finally, now there is 5), and I wonder which one it corresponds to...
apt-get -u dist-upgrade
Ciao,
Eike
Hello!
Zenaan Harkness schrieb:
> I guess I
> need to read the man pages to grok the difference there again too.
Yes. :o)
> Finally, now there is 5), and I wonder which one it corresponds to...
apt-get -u dist-upgrade
Ciao,
Eike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
53 matches
Mail list logo
