Re: mediawiki package

2005-01-23 Thread Duck
re of it. My package is working and quite clean, integrating math support, so you may look at it to improve yours. It is available here : http://debian.duckcorp.org/ Have a lot of FUN ! -- Marc DequÃnes (Duck) pgpwJLXuf35G5.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Sponsor Request

2003-08-17 Thread Duck
, mozilla-snapshot and mozilla-firebird) So people can choose to install beaver02 or beaver 03, which branch they prefer. One other thing, it seems rather difficult to find a sponsor these days, so i hope you will be luckier than some of us. Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2

Re: Sponsor Request

2003-08-17 Thread Duck
, mozilla-snapshot and mozilla-firebird) So people can choose to install beaver02 or beaver 03, which branch they prefer. One other thing, it seems rather difficult to find a sponsor these days, so i hope you will be luckier than some of us. Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2

Re: webmin

2003-08-14 Thread Duck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Coin, First of all, these kind of question as nothing to do in here. Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] If u get a bad request it is probably because webmin is using a secure connection by default. So, try : https://129.48.77.3:1 Duck -BEGIN PGP

RFS: ArkHart

2003-08-14 Thread Duck
https://duckcorp.coinnetwork.dyndns.org/projects/pkg-arkrpg/ My gnupg key has already been signed and can be found on this server : gnv.us.ks.cryptnet.net Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/&g

Re: debix-imager searches sponsor

2003-08-14 Thread Duck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Quack, I wish u success in ur struggle to find a sponsor. Everybody here seems to be on hollydays, we should stay patient. Quackquack to u ! Duck P.S. : i don't c the point of creating/finalizing, could u add a full exemple with explana

RFS: ArkHart

2003-08-14 Thread Duck
https://duckcorp.coinnetwork.dyndns.org/projects/pkg-arkrpg/ My gnupg key has already been signed and can be found on this server : gnv.us.ks.cryptnet.net Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/&g

Re: webmin

2003-08-13 Thread Duck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Coin, First of all, these kind of question as nothing to do in here. Please use debian-user@lists.debian.org If u get a bad request it is probably because webmin is using a secure connection by default. So, try : https://129.48.77.3:1 Duck

RFS : Slune and dependencies

2003-08-10 Thread Duck
been checked successfully against lintian. My gnupg key has already been signed. Thx Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/NSMksczZcpAmcIYRApV4AJ41tp6PCy8kc2PDnJ4PyMP/

Re: debix-imager searches sponsor

2003-08-10 Thread Duck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Quack, I wish u success in ur struggle to find a sponsor. Everybody here seems to be on hollydays, we should stay patient. Quackquack to u ! Duck P.S. : i don't c the point of creating/finalizing, could u add a full exemple with explana

RFS : Slune and dependencies

2003-08-09 Thread Duck
been checked successfully against lintian. My gnupg key has already been signed. Thx Duck -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/NSMksczZcpAmcIYRApV4AJ41tp6PCy8kc2PDnJ4PyMP/

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread MaD dUCK
hi developers, this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there already a mainta

Re: [users] Re: Where's lame

2001-05-07 Thread MaD dUCK
hi developers, this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going on on the users mailing list about lame and its absence from the package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there already a maint