I've been in some discussion with another developer. He's decided it would
be nice to split out some interface modules for a package. These modules
constitute reasonably small single files and copies of the relevant
documentation.
I'm of the opinion that a few KB is too small for a .deb that could
I've been in some discussion with another developer. He's decided it would
be nice to split out some interface modules for a package. These modules
constitute reasonably small single files and copies of the relevant
documentation.
I'm of the opinion that a few KB is too small for a .deb that could
I'm using sourceforge's compile farm and I'd like to know how to use it to
compile packages for unstable. They use woody. I also have an account on
HP's testdrive systems.
Is there any reasonably easy way to do this? I know that the buildd's can
take care of it, but I'd like to be able to do this
I'm using sourceforge's compile farm and I'd like to know how to use it to
compile packages for unstable. They use woody. I also have an account on
HP's testdrive systems.
Is there any reasonably easy way to do this? I know that the buildd's can
take care of it, but I'd like to be able to do this
I'm glad to see this service.
The Developer's Reference lists
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ as being a place to
co-ordinate the sponsoring of packages. Currently it's unavailable to me
(down?). Other problems I have with it include: no place to upload
packages and it's for "
Hi,
What would be the proper procedure for requesting an NMU? Assuming
that all the conditions are met as described in
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu and
it's sub sections, except that the person desiring the NMU is not a debian
developer, would it be a
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > > inside /org/bugs.
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > > inside /org/bugs.
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Where might I get a copy of the bug database? Is there any way to search
> > the bug database by text?
>
> Sorry, not yet, unless you have an acco
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Where might I get a copy of the bug database? Is there any way to search
> > the bug database by text?
>
> Sorry, not yet, unless you have an acco
Hi,
Where might I get a copy of the bug database? Is there any way to search
the bug database by text? I filed a bug (#187064 [1]) against
bugs.debian.org, but I want to know if there may be some kind of work
around. Please note that "good" search engines cannot be used due to the
robots.txt file o
Hi,
Where might I get a copy of the bug database? Is there any way to search
the bug database by text? I filed a bug (#187064 [1]) against
bugs.debian.org, but I want to know if there may be some kind of work
around. Please note that "good" search engines cannot be used due to the
robots.txt file o
Why is [EMAIL PROTECTED] not web accessible?
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-mailing-lists-special
explains why debian-private isn't accessible.
Should I file a bug against the developer's reference or against
lists.debian.org? I don't think I'm stating a fals
Why is [EMAIL PROTECTED] not web accessible?
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-mailing-lists-special
explains why debian-private isn't accessible.
Should I file a bug against the developer's reference or against
lists.debian.org? I don't think I'm stating a fals
Hi,
I want to create myself a good gpg signature for use as a Debian
Developer. I am uncertain as to what the best way to do this is. I'm under
the impression that RSA is a better algorithm than Elg-e or DSA, and I
do know about the potential incompatibilities, but I think they are few.
I am think
Hi,
I want to create myself a good gpg signature for use as a Debian
Developer. I am uncertain as to what the best way to do this is. I'm under
the impression that RSA is a better algorithm than Elg-e or DSA, and I
do know about the potential incompatibilities, but I think they are few.
I am think
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Chad Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:57:26PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related
> > activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version
> >
Hi,
Where should I post general programming questions? What are some good
(interactive) resources? I'm still reading the required and suggested new
maintainer's documentation, so forgive me if it's pointed out somewhere.
A real example should anyone be inclined to comment:
In C++, I have a base cl
Hi,
I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related
activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version
of pgp on a set of solaris systems I have access to, the problem is they
have PGP version 2.6.3i. I'm unsure as to whether this is a secure version
of PG
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Chad Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:57:26PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related
> > activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version
> >
Hi,
Where should I post general programming questions? What are some good
(interactive) resources? I'm still reading the required and suggested new
maintainer's documentation, so forgive me if it's pointed out somewhere.
A real example should anyone be inclined to comment:
In C++, I have a base cl
Hi,
I would like to setup a key to eventually be used for Debian related
activities (the kind nm's need). I would like to use an existing version
of pgp on a set of solaris systems I have access to, the problem is they
have PGP version 2.6.3i. I'm unsure as to whether this is a secure version
of PG
22 matches
Mail list logo
