Re: Bug#1055332: RFS: hunspell-be/0.60-1 -- Belarusian dictionary for hunspell and academic orthography

2023-12-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
, see dh(1) for details. 4. In addition, for deleting be_BY.bdic, instead of a new target in debian/rules you can use debian/clean file with one line (be_BY.bdic). -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1032806: RFS: privacybrowser/0.1-1 [ITP] -- web browser that respects your privacy

2023-03-15 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
updates in stable. Although, I would be happy to discuss this with them. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#943669: RFS: backintime 1.2.1-2 -- simple backup/snapshot system [closes RC bugs]

2019-10-30 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
graph of qt/docbook/en/legal.xml in the license text (before the “On Debian systems” part). [1]: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-short-name -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#917854: RFS: pygithub/1.43.3-1

2019-02-01 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
s and should be avoided. Now that Python 3.6 is no longer supported (and there is only one supported Python 3 version), that hack can be dropped. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#912704: RFS: python-tinycss/0.4-2

2018-11-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
he last commit is from Ondřej), and document in the changelog that you have added yourself to Uploaders. Then I will upload it. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#900368: RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

2018-07-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
ed to do it after dh_python3 runs. So better use this: override_dh_python3: dh_python3 rm -rfv debian/python3-github/usr/lib/python3.* -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#900368: RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

2018-07-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
isn't? Yes, it is better to merge these entries and keep one entry per actual upload to archive. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#900368: RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

2018-07-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
://alioth-archive.debian.org/git/users/kaction-guest/pygithub.git.tar.xz [2]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ [3]: https://pypi.org/project/PyGithub/1.40/ [4]: https://pypi.debian.net/PyGithub/watch -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#839696: -- Python parser for the CommonMark Markdown spec

2016-10-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
for this > purposed. > All this stuff is exposed in debian/README.Debian . OK, that explains it. I was lazy and did not look for README.Debian. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#839696: Fwd: Bug#839696: RFS: commonmark-bkrs -- Python parser for the CommonMark Markdown spec

2016-10-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
that you packaged the new version instead. [1]: https://github.com/rolandshoemaker/CommonMark-py [2]: https://github.com/rtfd/CommonMark-py -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#837319: Bug#837312: nmu: cdist_4.3.1-1

2016-09-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
etc). But even major releases happen quite often nowadays: i.e. 1.5 is expected in end of Oct. or middle of Nov. Or, even better, if you really care about those tiny .pngs, please propose a patch against dh_sphinxdoc to take care of them :) > I really, really dislike files duplication, however small they are. -- Dmitry Shachnev signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#837319: Bug#837312: nmu: cdist_4.3.1-1

2016-09-10 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
ed binary package size and, > what bothers me more, several instances of same file in my /usr. Please drop it. dh_sphinxdoc replaces the JS files with correct symlinks, so you do not need to care about it. (It does not replace the images though, but they are few hundred bytes each, so linkin

Bug#711402: RFS: scandir/0.1+git20130521-1 [ITP]

2013-06-30 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
N3 = $(shell py3versions -r) > > instead? This can be used to make sure that scripts get a #!/usr/bin/python3 shebang, and not a versioned one (see also #692393). This package doesn't seem to have any scripts, though. -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ

Bug#704668: RFS: woff-tools/0:2009.10.04-1 [ITP]

2013-05-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
add that to the list of packages I can upload :) -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKimPHXzS1Bbski5tk-mRKQtsVs7dOnbyaj=e2i9pavhgip...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#704668: RFS: woff-tools/0:2009.10.04-1 [ITP]

2013-04-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> cppcheck says: >> [woff.c:281]: (error) Common realloc mistake: 'woffData' nulled but not >> freed upon failure >> [woff.c:301]: (error) Common realloc mistake: 'woffData' nulled but not &g

Bug#704668: RFS: woff-tools/0:2009.10.04-1 [ITP]

2013-04-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > (I don't intend to sponsor this. Sorry!) Thanks for the review anyway! > * Dmitry Shachnev , 2013-04-07, 16:48: > >>> FTR, the repository is here: >>> svn://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-fonts/packages/woff-tools/trun

Bug#704668: RFS: woff-tools/0:2009.10.04-1 [ITP]

2013-04-07 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > FTR, the repository is here: > svn://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-fonts/packages/woff-tools/trunk > > Please fix the Vcs-Svn field. :) Done, thanks! I should probably have mentioned it when I was filing the bug… -- Dmitry Shac

Bug#704668: RFS: woff-tools/0:2009.10.04-1 [ITP]

2013-04-07 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Jakub, On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:26:01 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Dmitry Shachnev , 2013-04-04, 14:36: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/woff-tools/woff-tools_2009.10.04-1.dsc > > FTBFS: > woff.c:43:18: fatal error: zlib.h: No such file or directory Fi

Bug#704668: RFS: woff-tools/0:2009.10.04-1 [ITP]

2013-04-04 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
09.10.04-1.dsc More information about woff-tools can be obtained from https://people.mozilla.com/~jkew/woff/. -- Dmitry Shachnev -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)

Bug#693330: RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1 mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1

2012-12-18 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
t-orig-source target in debian/rules. Which way would you prefer: - getting the tarball from github directly; - cloning the git repo and then building the archive manually? Both are a bit tricky, and neither provides an easy way to get the upstream version (which should be A.B+MMDD). Will

Bug#693330: RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1 mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1

2012-12-17 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
sible to run clean twice. > But all that's a bit nit-picky. Now lets look at the doc package: > > 1) Again, in debian/copyright you could optionally clean it up a bit > by using stand-alone license paragraphs. Done. > 2) In debian/control, you have: > > Maintainer: Dmitr

Bug#693335: RFS: pymarkups/0.2.3-1

2012-11-25 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Dmitry Shachnev , 2012-11-18, 15:00: > >>> License in debian/copyright is not the same as in LICENSE. >> >> Fixed upstream (I believe) — is that what you meant: >> >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mitya57/python-markups/trunk/revision/8

Bug#693335: RFS: pymarkups/0.2.3-1

2012-11-18 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
d('') >> if start_position >= 0 and end_position >= 0: >> mjurl = head[start_position:end_position+9]+'\n' >> return mjurl.replace(MATHJAX_WEB_URL, get_mathjax_url(webenv)) >> return '' > > Eww again. How about usin

Bug#693335: RFS: pymarkups/0.2.3-1

2012-11-15 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
ReText 4.0, which will be released soon. Only the Python 3 version is provided since ReText will be using Python 3 by default (and I don't know any apps that are going to use the Python 2 version). * Package name: pymarkups Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : myself (Dmitry S

Bug#693330: RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1; mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1

2012-11-15 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
* debian/patches/no_mathjax_js_in_documentation.patch: Remove reference to MathJax.js from mjtheme/layout.html. -- Dmitry Shachnev Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:54:51 +0400 - s/it's/its/ in the first line, of course :) -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#693330: RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1; mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1

2012-11-15 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
;t add any new code/text, so an ITP bug is not needed (I think). Also, upstream no longer provides "tag" releases (but "rolling" branches instead), so I have tweaked version numbers to indicate that. Thanks in advance, -- Dmitry Shachnev -- System Information: Debian Releas

Re: RFS: python-gnupg

2012-03-27 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
? I've committed my changes to DMPT svn ([2], actually, python-gnupg packaging was already available there, but it was broken and the original author said I can replace it). [1]: http://paste.debian.net/161128/ [2]: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-gnupg/trunk/d

Re: RFS: Please sponsor NMU for python-markdown

2012-01-12 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Thanks everyone for replying, the help is no more needed — I've contacted the maintainer and he will help me to get this uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lis

Re: RFS: Please sponsor NMU for python-markdown

2012-01-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
OK, I mailed to debian-python list and attached fixed files there. On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Dmitry (2012.01.11_08:36:27_+0200) >> Updated diff can be found here at http://paste.ubuntu.com/800258/. > > All in all, that's probably too big for an NMU (it changes t

Re: RFS: Please sponsor NMU for python-markdown

2012-01-10 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Update: mentors.debian.net seems to allow re-uploads, so I fixed two issues I wrote about in previous message. Updated diff can be found here at http://paste.ubuntu.com/800258/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Re: Should dh_python2 be used for single-file python applications?

2011-08-15 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Thanks for the reply, I will split the code to the launcher and modules in the next version (probably 2.5), and keep it unchanged for now. Also, I'll file a bug to python-markdown package. -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Should dh_python2 be used for single-file python applications?

2011-08-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
o module and launcher (in upstream tarball, since I'm also the upstream author)? And one off-topic question: when Debian will provide Python 3 packages for modules supporting it? Like python-qt4 (bug 558389) and python-markdown? -- Thanks for advance, Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Compiling Qt translation files

2011-06-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Thanks, I'll change it in the next version. - Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=t=hzhuzjcpi5um7h35z90me7...@mail.gmail.com

Compiling Qt translation files

2011-06-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
ring build? This will add a big build-dependency on Qt. - Dmitry Shachnev (http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mitya57%40gmail.com) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia

RFS: retext (another try)

2011-06-01 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "retext". * Package name: retext Version : 1.1.0-2 Upstream Author : I (Dmitry Shachnev) * URL : http://retext.sourceforge.net/ * License : GNU GPL Section : editors It builds th

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-17 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fixed (retext 1.0.2-4). As a side-effect, debian.tar.gz now contains icons/* dirs. (I can remove them at each build, but I'll everytime forget to do it :) ). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Done! override_dh_auto_clean: dh_auto_clean rm -rf debian/icons rm -f retext rm -f wpgen/wpgen Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Dear mentors, I updated my package "retext" and I am still looking for a sponsor. This version solves some packaging issues that I was pointed to. Also, this is new upstream release. * Package name: retext Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : me (Dmitry Shach

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
You didn't understand me. dh_auto_clean is being called BEFORE the build process, but I need to remove retext and wpgen/wpgen AFTER it. I will try to solve this via adding a customized binary-indep and install sections. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hm... It seems that dh_auto_clean is called *before* the build process: fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_auto_clean rm -rf debian/icons mv retext retext.py mv: could not stat «retext»: No such file or directory Maybe I should use dh_something_else instead? (The same with dh_clean). BTW, ReText 1

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Can you upload it or I should fix something else? 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev : > This will have no effect. > I have already renamed that file upstream (but maybe index is not updated > yet). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &qu

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
I renamed those files upstream. 2011/5/9 Fabrizio Regalli : > Hi, > > Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 16.09 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: >> Fix: >> * Lintian says I should put >> "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to >&g

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fix: * Lintian says I should put "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to debian/watch, but I don't think it works 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev : > I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out > (retext 1.0.1b-4). > Some notes: &

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
I have put some "mv && dh_install && mv" commands in debian/rules * "--with python2" is needed for Python packages, retext and wpgen are just single files in /usr/bin [0] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-watch-file-should-use-sf-redirector.html Dmitry Sha

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Just a question: Should I create a new bug (to include its number) or it's not essential? 2011/5/8 Dmitry Shachnev : > Thanks for your advice! I will provide an updated package tomorrow. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Thanks for your advice! I will provide an updated package tomorrow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimE9RyzZ==fkykyxlg3wa_enp5...@mail.gmail.c

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fixed (upstream tarball updated as well). Is it enough to provide /usr/share/doc/retext/changelog.gz, or we need one for retext-wpgen too? Dmitry Shachnev 2011/5/8 Fabrizio Regalli : > Hi Dmitry, > > two thing: > > W: retext source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (c