On 03/03/04, at 16:09 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:33:39AM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote:
> > >The proper place for the script (after doing things right) is
> > >ghostscript upstream. Take a look at pdf2ps and try to get your program
> > >next to that
On 02/03/04, at 15:31 +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK. Let's assume that I'm convinced that a pdfmerge script was useful.
Good start :-)
> There's no reason to produce packages for a one liner.
> As for your "another way of doing things": Just because there's not one
>
On 03/03/04, at 16:09 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:33:39AM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote:
> > >The proper place for the script (after doing things right) is
> > >ghostscript upstream. Take a look at pdf2ps and try to get your program
> > >next to that
On 02/03/04, at 15:31 +0100, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK. Let's assume that I'm convinced that a pdfmerge script was useful.
Good start :-)
> There's no reason to produce packages for a one liner.
> As for your "another way of doing things": Just because there's not one
>
>From tv_AT_beamnet_de,
>Which is bad, because I'm sure the package will raise the "why does
>every badly written, trivial script need to be included in Debian?"
Do you know how many people use this "trivial script"? You'll be surprise
to know that at least 10 people are downloading it from a Fed
>From tv_AT_beamnet_de,
>Which is bad, because I'm sure the package will raise the "why does
>every badly written, trivial script need to be included in Debian?"
Do you know how many people use this "trivial script"? You'll be surprise
to know that at least 10 people are downloading it from a Fed
6 matches
Mail list logo
