Re: Package Name Choice

2004-08-08 Thread Christoffer Sawicki
> I would *never* blindly trust upstream to choose a name that is sane for > Debian. The upstream name (gtk-qt) is particularly poor in this case. The upstream name is actually gtk-qt-engine. */ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Package Name Choice

2004-08-08 Thread Christoffer Sawicki
> I would *never* blindly trust upstream to choose a name that is sane for > Debian. The upstream name (gtk-qt) is particularly poor in this case. The upstream name is actually gtk-qt-engine. */ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Package Name Choice

2004-08-06 Thread Christoffer Sawicki
rawing and is configured through KControl. Do you think the package name should be gtk-qt-engine or gtk2-engines-gtk-qt? Please CC me, I'm not on the list. [0] http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/gtk-qt */ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package Name Choice

2004-08-06 Thread Christoffer Sawicki
rawing and is configured through KControl. Do you think the package name should be gtk-qt-engine or gtk2-engines-gtk-qt? Please CC me, I'm not on the list. [0] http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/gtk-qt */ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM