Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> For the gnome desktop entry:
> /usr/share/gnome/apps/Internet/WebHTTrack.desktop
Not the right place for desktop files.
See http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/menu/draft/menu-spec/menu-spec.html
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> For the gnome desktop entry:
> /usr/share/gnome/apps/Internet/WebHTTrack.desktop
Not the right place for desktop files.
See http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/menu/draft/menu-spec/menu-spec.html
Christian
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> and I don't even know if it will work agains new Gnome 2.0 panel
> (haven't had time to test).
Of course not. You need to hack the code for that. Upstream author is
Bruno Pires Marinho ?
Christian
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> and I don't even know if it will work agains new Gnome 2.0 panel
> (haven't had time to test).
Of course not. You need to hack the code for that. Upstream author is
Bruno Pires Marinho ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
>> "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
>> > > means.
> In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
> [
>> "Robbe" == Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work
>> > > means.
> In another mail, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So what? The one who uploads the first wins.
>
t this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
>> libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in
>> Depends and Build-depends fields.
> Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on
> reinventing packaging that has al
t this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no
>> libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in
>> Depends and Build-depends fields.
> Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on
> reinventing packaging that has al
>> "CA" == Chris AtLee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, so if I just remove that .desktop file from the list of conffiles,
> everything will be fine? I put it in there because I noticed that the
Yes.
> .gnorba file was automatically a conffile (I guess because it was put in
> /etc) and didn't
>> "CA" == Chris AtLee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, so if I just remove that .desktop file from the list of conffiles,
> everything will be fine? I put it in there because I noticed that the
Yes.
> .gnorba file was automatically a conffile (I guess because it was put in
> /etc) and didn't
>> "CA" == Chris AtLee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok...So why does gnome-applets put stuff into /usr/share/applets? Or do
> those files not count as configuration files?
Those files aren't configuration files. Those files are menu entries
.desktop files.
Christian
>> "CA" == Chris AtLee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok...So why does gnome-applets put stuff into /usr/share/applets? Or do
> those files not count as configuration files?
Those files aren't configuration files. Those files are menu entries
.desktop files.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
>> "PD" == Patrick Dahiroc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi all,
Hi,
> i'm trying to make a debian package for xmleditor, but
> ./configure fails when it check for header glade.h,
> since glade.h is in /usr/local/libglade-1.0/glade NOT
> /usr/local/glade.
AM_PATH_LIBGLADE(,
AC_MSG_ERROR(*** Can
>> "PD" == Patrick Dahiroc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi all,
Hi,
> i'm trying to make a debian package for xmleditor, but
> ./configure fails when it check for header glade.h,
> since glade.h is in /usr/local/libglade-1.0/glade NOT
> /usr/local/glade.
AM_PATH_LIBGLADE(,
AC_MSG_ERROR(*** Ca
>> "EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since some days, when building packages, I don't have libc6 version
> included anymore. dpkg-deb then complains:
I had the same problem yesterday when building gnome-libs.
Of course I can't reproduce this problem.
Christian
>> "EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since some days, when building packages, I don't have libc6 version
> included anymore. dpkg-deb then complains:
I had the same problem yesterday when building gnome-libs.
Of course I can't reproduce this problem.
Christian
--
To
>> "JP" == Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi ..
Hi,
[...]
> Does anyone know, how to build my gnome-tool propper with the new
> location of the gnome1.4 libs?
Search for gdk-pixbuf-config and replace above by gnome-config
Christian
>> "JP" == Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi ..
Hi,
[...]
> Does anyone know, how to build my gnome-tool propper with the new
> location of the gnome1.4 libs?
Search for gdk-pixbuf-config and replace above by gnome-config
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
>> "DIL" == David I Lehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> So does this mean the library is not suitable for Debian? Other
> projects use liba52 code, libac3 code (old version), or other
> implementations of the specs: xine, mplayer, xmps, videolan, avifile,
> and probably many more. Many of
>> "DIL" == David I Lehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
hi,
> I packaged liba52 and libmpeg2 a while ago. They've been sitting at
> http://gstreamer.net/releases/debian/ (along with gstreamer debs too).
> I'm still in limbo in the new maintainer queue and figure I should ITP
> this stuff, up
>> "DIL" == David I Lehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> So does this mean the library is not suitable for Debian? Other
> projects use liba52 code, libac3 code (old version), or other
> implementations of the specs: xine, mplayer, xmps, videolan, avifile,
> and probably many more. Many of
>> "DIL" == David I Lehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
hi,
> I packaged liba52 and libmpeg2 a while ago. They've been sitting at
> http://gstreamer.net/releases/debian/ (along with gstreamer debs too).
> I'm still in limbo in the new maintainer queue and figure I should ITP
> this stuff, u
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> You can also run lintian with the -i (or --info) flag to print these
> automatically.
Or if you are using debuild "debuild -L -i" to see lintian error against
the source (ie: errors in debian/control)
Christian
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> You can also run lintian with the -i (or --info) flag to print these
> automatically.
Or if you are using debuild "debuild -L -i" to see lintian error against
the source (ie: errors in debian/control)
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
>>>> "JR" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:01:29PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I received a bug report #112103, where somebody complains because my
>> debian/rules doesn't work with ash.
>>
>
Hi,
I received a bug report #112103, where somebody complains because my
debian/rules doesn't work with ash.
Is there a good reason to change this file ?
I see nothing in the Debian policy.
Christian
>>>> "JR" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:01:29PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I received a bug report #112103, where somebody complains because my
>> debian/rules doesn't work with ash.
>>
>
Hi,
I received a bug report #112103, where somebody complains because my
debian/rules doesn't work with ash.
Is there a good reason to change this file ?
I see nothing in the Debian policy.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
"DA" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> This is a file to edit and some maintainer forget that.
>>
> you don't have to edit it all the time, only when your ABI changes :)
Yes, but see libgal or gtkhtml.
>> A line like this in debian/rules is better IMHO.
>>
>> dh_m
"DA" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> This is a file to edit and some maintainer forget that.
>>
> you don't have to edit it all the time, only when your ABI changes :)
Yes, but see libgal or gtkhtml.
>> A line like this in debian/rules is better IMHO.
>>
>> dh_
"DA" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> So is "dh_makeshlibs -V" (i.e. bump the version uncondtionally) simply
>> the lazy-man's way of doing this?
>>
> best solution INHO is to write .shlibs file by hand and update minimum
> version required every time you understand
"DA" == Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> So is "dh_makeshlibs -V" (i.e. bump the version uncondtionally) simply
>> the lazy-man's way of doing this?
>>
> best solution INHO is to write .shlibs file by hand and update minimum
> version required every time you understan
"PS" == Pratik Sinha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> when i use the command debrelease it gives me an error
PS> dupload fatal error: Need host to upload to. (See --to option or the
default_host configuration variable)
PS> at /usr/bin/dupload line 143
PS> i'm using progeny debian 1.0 x86.
"DR" == Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
DR> My question is: Why does Gnome not use mailcap? Or is there a standard way
to
DR> add mime-types to Gnome?
Read /usr/share/mime-info/gnome.mime
Christian
"DR" == Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
DR> My question is: Why does Gnome not use mailcap? Or is there a standard way to
DR> add mime-types to Gnome?
Read /usr/share/mime-info/gnome.mime
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
"MAS" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> When you talk about gtk2 and glib2, you mean gtk+
>> 1.35 and glib 1.3.5 ?
MAS> Indeed, but for package naming purpose I guess calling
MAS> them libglib2 and libgtk2 would work.
I disagree. The API may change between 1.3.5
"MAS" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> When you talk about gtk2 and glib2, you mean gtk+
>> 1.35 and glib 1.3.5 ?
MAS> Indeed, but for package naming purpose I guess calling
MAS> them libglib2 and libgtk2 would work.
I disagree. The API may change between 1.3.
"MAS" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MAS> I believe Pango has to be included as well since Inti provides
MAS> bidirectional text support. Packages should
Quoting http://sources.redhat.com/inti/inti-manual/inti-manual.html
Inti is an integrated C++ development platform
"MAS" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MAS> I believe Pango has to be included as well since Inti
MAS> provides bidirectional text support. Packages should
MAS> be up tomorrow.
Pango is a separate tarball (current release 0.16)
When you talk about gtk2 and glib2, you me
"MAS" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MAS> I believe Pango has to be included as well since Inti provides
MAS> bidirectional text support. Packages should
Quoting http://sources.redhat.com/inti/inti-manual/inti-manual.html
Inti is an integrated C++ development platfor
"MAS" == Michèl Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MAS> I believe Pango has to be included as well since Inti
MAS> provides bidirectional text support. Packages should
MAS> be up tomorrow.
Pango is a separate tarball (current release 0.16)
When you talk about gtk2 and glib2, you m
>>>> "CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> debhelper isn't compliant with the latest policy (Change with example
>> path).
CW> I think you're misreading the upgrading-che
>>>> "CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> debhelper isn't compliant with the latest policy (Change with example
>> path).
CW> I think you're misreading the upgrading
"CL" == Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CL> On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Hi Colin!
>>
>> > >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
>> >
>> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>>
>> Hiehie, yea
"CL" == Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CL> On Sun, 20 May 2001 00:42:10 +0200, Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Colin!
>>
>> > >However, if I run debstd, I get the following:
>> >
>> > One good question is "why are you still using debstd?" :)
>>
>> Hiehie, yea
"PSG" == Peter S Galbraith writes:
[...]
PSG> to this on debian/rules :
PSG> install -m 4755 -g floppy jazip debian/tmp/usr/bin
PSG> The problem is that fakeroot is _not_ setting the ownership
PSG> in the package.
Even with ?
dh_fixperms -Xusr/bin/jazip
Christian
"PSG" == Peter S Galbraith writes:
[...]
PSG> to this on debian/rules :
PSG> install -m 4755 -g floppy jazip debian/tmp/usr/bin
PSG> The problem is that fakeroot is _not_ setting the ownership
PSG> in the package.
Even with ?
dh_fixperms -Xusr/bin/jazip
Christian
--
To U
>>>> "JG" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JG> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 07:50:11PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To close this bug #89670 "should consider switching to libdb3", I can build
>> gnome-li
>>>> "CM" == Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> Hi,
CM> To close this bug #89670 "should consider switching to libdb3", I can build
CM> gnome-libs against libdb1.
CM> This is a good idea ?
Forget, this work with libdb3 now.
Christian
>>>> "JG" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JG> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 07:50:11PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To close this bug #89670 "should consider switching to libdb3", I can build
>> gnome-li
Hi,
To close this bug #89670 "should consider switching to libdb3", I can build
gnome-libs against libdb1.
This is a good idea ?
Christian
>>>> "CM" == Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> Hi,
CM> To close this bug #89670 "should consider switching to libdb3", I can build
CM> gnome-libs against libdb1.
CM> This is a good idea ?
Forget, this work with libdb3 now.
Hi,
To close this bug #89670 "should consider switching to libdb3", I can build
gnome-libs against libdb1.
This is a good idea ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"n" == ndez writes:
>>
>> Maybe compiling glade-gnome against bonobo ?
>>
>> Christian
n> I'm new maintaining gnome packages (really maintaining all packages) and
n> I don't fully understand you.
n> If upstream maintainer haven't coded glade bonobo-aware compiling it
n> against bonobo l
"n" == ndez writes:
>>
>> Maybe compiling glade-gnome against bonobo ?
>>
>> Christian
n> I'm new maintaining gnome packages (really maintaining all packages) and
n> I don't fully understand you.
n> If upstream maintainer haven't coded glade bonobo-aware compiling it
n> against bonobo
"LA-" == Luis Arocha -data- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LA-> Y el lunes 9 de abril, James LewisMoss escribió:
>>
Eric> GNOME Packages not up to 1.4 in unstable
Eric> * glade* gnome-guile* gnome-pim gnome-print gnome-python* gtop
Eric> imlib scrollkeeper
>>
>> No help needed for gnome-guile
"LA-" == Luis Arocha -data- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LA-> Y el lunes 9 de abril, James LewisMoss escribió:
>>
Eric> GNOME Packages not up to 1.4 in unstable
Eric> * glade* gnome-guile* gnome-pim gnome-print gnome-python* gtop
Eric> imlib scrollkeeper
>>
>> No help needed for gnome-guil
Hi,
I've this bug report #89874 :
As seen below, gnome-terminal logs the pid for gnome-terminal in utmp,
rather than the pid of the user's shell, as is expected. (I.e., the PID
recorded for pts/0 should be 1128.)
> ./who -uH
NAME LINE TIME IDLE PID COMMENT
mstone
Hi,
I've this bug report #89874 :
As seen below, gnome-terminal logs the pid for gnome-terminal in utmp,
rather than the pid of the user's shell, as is expected. (I.e., the PID
recorded for pts/0 should be 1128.)
> ./who -uH
NAME LINE TIME IDLE PID COMMENT
mstone
Hi,
I've this error (with sid) :
I don't know wath's wrong.
Christian
$ debuild -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gtktalog
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:0.11.1-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpk
Hi,
I've this error (with sid) :
I don't know wath's wrong.
Christian
$ debuild -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gtktalog
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:0.11.1-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpk
>>>> "DF" == Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DF> Christian Marillat writes:
>> A maintainer need to point apt to testing or unstable ?
DF> Since you will be uploading to unstable, you will probably want to
We will always upload for unstabl
Hi,
Happy new year.
My first stupid question for this new year.
A maintainer need to point apt to testing or unstable ?
Christian
>>>> "DF" == Decklin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DF> Christian Marillat writes:
>> A maintainer need to point apt to testing or unstable ?
DF> Since you will be uploading to unstable, you will probably want to
We will always upload for unstabl
Hi,
Happy new year.
My first stupid question for this new year.
A maintainer need to point apt to testing or unstable ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"MZ" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> E: gnome-panel-data: debian-changelog-file-missing
>>
>> This is normal ?
MZ> Lintian has no way to check whether the changelog is valid, since it isn't
in
MZ> the package. It seems to have a special check for packages which sym
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
I've another problem with lintian.
Lintian complain if I make a symlink with changelog.Debian like :
/usr/share/doc/gnome-panel-data/changelog.Debian.gz ->
../gnome-panel/changelog.Debian.gz
E: gnome-panel-data: debian-change
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>>> if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/sawfish-lisp-source -a -d
>>> /usr/share/doc/sawfish-lisp-source ]; then
>> [...]
>>
>> I think it's choking because of source, the check m/\bsource\b/ is matching
>> because `-' seems to be
"MZ" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> E: gnome-panel-data: debian-changelog-file-missing
>>
>> This is normal ?
MZ> Lintian has no way to check whether the changelog is valid, since it isn't in
MZ> the package. It seems to have a special check for packages which sym
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
I've another problem with lintian.
Lintian complain if I make a symlink with changelog.Debian like :
/usr/share/doc/gnome-panel-data/changelog.Debian.gz ->
../gnome-panel/changelog.Debian.gz
E: gnome-panel-data: debian-chang
"S'P" == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>>> if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/sawfish-lisp-source -a -d
>>> /usr/share/doc/sawfish-lisp-source ]; then
>> [...]
>>
>> I think it's choking because of source, the check m/\bsource\b/ is matching
>> because `-' seems to b
Hi,
I've this strange output with lintian and I see nothing wrong in these
scripts (debhelper scripts)
Any idea ?
Christian
W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:4
W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:5
W: sawfish-lisp-source: p
Hi,
I've this strange output with lintian and I see nothing wrong in these
scripts (debhelper scripts)
Any idea ?
Christian
W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:4
W: sawfish-lisp-source: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:5
W: sawfish-lisp-source:
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Which is the difference ?
BC> The difference is that you have one package that conflicts with any of the
BC> optimized library packages I have. There going to be more, so it is easier
BC> for me to add your one package, than for your
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> I've a solution :-)
>>
>> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC> How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC> libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
Which is the difference ?
Chris
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Any other idea ?
Christian
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Which is the difference ?
BC> The difference is that you have one package that conflicts with any of the
BC> optimized library packages I have. There going to be more, so it is easier
BC> for me to add your one package, than for your
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> I've a solution :-)
>>
>> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC> How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC> libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
Which is the difference ?
Chri
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Any other idea ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
"YA" == Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
YA> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
>>
>> This is dangerous, because if a package use i18n the Makefile
>> in po/ don't
>> understand DESTDIR, and all locale aren't installed.
YA> :( :( :(
YA> I guess the Makefile in po/ is autogen
"YA" == Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
YA> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
>>
>> This is dangerous, because if a package use i18n the Makefile
>> in po/ don't
>> understand DESTDIR, and all locale aren't installed.
YA> :( :( :(
YA> I guess the Makefile in po/ is autoge
"YA" == Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> $(MAKE) install prefix=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr sysconfdir=`pwd`/tmp/etc
YA> If it's using autoconf, there's a chance that the package also lets you
YA> specify DESTDIR to install, as in:
YA> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
"YA" == Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> $(MAKE) install prefix=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr sysconfdir=`pwd`/tmp/etc
YA> If it's using autoconf, there's a chance that the package also lets you
YA> specify DESTDIR to install, as in:
YA> $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tm
"AK" == Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AK> Hi.
Hi,
AK> I have not packaged libraries yet, and I'm going to do. What is the easyest
AK> way to start?
Take a diff file from a lib package (maybe libgdk-pixbuf2) and see how this
work.
Christian
"AK" == Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AK> Hi.
Hi,
AK> I have not packaged libraries yet, and I'm going to do. What is the easyest
AK> way to start?
Take a diff file from a lib package (maybe libgdk-pixbuf2) and see how this
work.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi,
It is safe to remove this from sawfish postinst ?
if [ -x /usr/sbin/register-window-manager ]; then
/usr/sbin/register-window-manager --add /usr/bin/sawfish
fi
Christian
Hi,
It is safe to remove this from sawfish postinst ?
if [ -x /usr/sbin/register-window-manager ]; then
/usr/sbin/register-window-manager --add /usr/bin/sawfish
fi
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
I've a bug report against sawfish (72384).
I want to know if a binary compiled against xlib6g 3.3.6-10 can work
correctly with xlib6g 4.0.1 ?
Christian
Hi,
I've a bug report against sawfish (72384).
I want to know if a binary compiled against xlib6g 3.3.6-10 can work
correctly with xlib6g 4.0.1 ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"MB" == Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> But why request by e-mail are wrong ?
MB> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] interface uses a `lynx -dump` on the url you
MB> mentioned above. the reason this was not correct, as Jason disabled the
MB> creation of the *static* www.debianorg/Bu
>>>> "JM" == Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 07:34:02PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
JM> dinstall 'fixes' NMU closed bugs.
JM> Is that the case?
>> Bugs are resolved. This is wrong !!!
JM> The
"MB" == Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> But why request by e-mail are wrong ?
MB> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] interface uses a `lynx -dump` on the url you
MB> mentioned above. the reason this was not correct, as Jason disabled the
MB> creation of the *static* www.debianorg/B
>>>> "JM" == Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 07:34:02PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
JM> dinstall 'fixes' NMU closed bugs.
JM> Is that the case?
>> Bugs are resolved. This is wrong !!!
JM> The
>>>> "JM" == Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I did a gnome-core NMU (1.2.0-0.1) and all bugs I've fixed are not fixed in
>> the BTS.
JM> dinstall '
>>>> "CS" == Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CS> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I request bug report by e-mail or with 'bugview gnome-core' and bugview
>> display the right page :
>>
&
"CS" == Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
CS> I see some bugs closed by you, but I don't know if they are the same you
CS> are talking about. Maybe you use not updated www.debian.org/Bugs/ and not
CS> bugs.debian.org/gnome-core?
I request bug report by e-mail or with 'bugvi
>>>> "JM" == Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I did a gnome-core NMU (1.2.0-0.1) and all bugs I've fixed are not fixed in
>> the BTS.
JM> dinstall '
>>>> "CS" == Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CS> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I request bug report by e-mail or with 'bugview gnome-core' and bugview
>> display the right page :
>>
Hi,
I did a gnome-core NMU (1.2.0-0.1) and all bugs I've fixed are not fixed in
the BTS.
Where is the problem ?
Christian
"CS" == Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
CS> I see some bugs closed by you, but I don't know if they are the same you
CS> are talking about. Maybe you use not updated www.debian.org/Bugs/ and not
CS> bugs.debian.org/gnome-core?
I request bug report by e-mail or with 'bugv
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
