Re: init script cannot stop pid process

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:25:38PM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > Hello, > > I make darkhttpd package and have a small issue. > > I prepare init script: > https://github.com/mati75/darkhttpd/blob/master/debian/init and for run > script with start parameter is working fine: This is just a shot i

Re: Debian package upstream watching

On 30/05/2013 07:01, T o n g wrote: > Hi, > > Is it the package maintainer's job to watch for upstream releases? > > How does this Debian package upstream watching works *practically*? > >>From http://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch/ I have the impression that I > have to come up with a scheme t

Re: Looking for Sponsor (GTK Manga Downloader)

On 07/05/2013 12:49, Ronny Wegener wrote: > Hi, > > my name is Ronny Wegener, i'm the developer of HakuNeko a GTK based manga > downloader. I would like to publish a source package to the debian repo. I > think it's a nice addition since there is no GUI based manga downloader > available for linux

Re: RFS: haserl (second try)

On 26/06/2011 03:29, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi, > >> On 02/05/2011 02:20, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >>> [...] >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> I've just uploaded a new version of haserl (0.9.29-1), which has the >> copyright >> issues fixed. Could you look through it please? >> > > Sorry for the wai

Re: RFS: haserl (second try)

On 02/05/2011 02:20, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > [...] Hi Michael, I've just uploaded a new version of haserl (0.9.29-1), which has the copyright issues fixed. Could you look through it please? Thanks for your time! -- Kind regards, Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signa

Re: RFS: haserl (second try)

On 01/05/2011 22:55, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi, > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haserl". >> >> * Package name: haserl >> Version : 0.9.27-1 >> Upstream Author : Nathan Angelacos >> * URL : http://haserl.sourceforge.net >> * License : GPL-2

Re: RFS: alarm-clock-applet (updated package)

On Monday 28,March,2011 10:46 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > [...] > Hi, Hi Peter, Thanks for your patches. I've looked through them, and I think I'll accept just the second one (regarding --watchfile). Comments are interleaved below:- > Bearing in mind that I'm not a DD yet and cannot really help

RFS: alarm-clock-applet (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.2-1 of my package "alarm-clock-applet". It builds these binary packages: alarm-clock-applet - Alarm Clock applet The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian

RFS: haserl (second try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haserl". * Package name: haserl Version : 0.9.27-1 Upstream Author : Nathan Angelacos * URL : http://haserl.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2 Section : interpreters It builds these binary pack

Re: RFS: haserl

On Sunday 30,January,2011 02:30 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Howdy fellow Ubuntu-er! Well, hello. > I'm not a DD, but here's my review: > > You have one lintian issue on your dsc ( really upstream source ) -- > no-complete-debconf-translation The debconf one is downstream, but there's nothing

RFS: haserl

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "haserl". * Package name: haserl Version : 0.9.27-1 Upstream Author : Nathan Angelacos * URL : http://haserl.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2 Section : interpreters It builds these binary pack

Re: Build depending on linux architectures only

> dpkg-architecture -L|grep -v solaris|grep -v openbsd|grep -v netbsd|grep -v > freebsd | grep -v darwin|grep -v hurd ? > > Thanks for pointers & help > > Greetings > > Helge Architecture: linux-any -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Reforming 'orig.tar.gz' with included tar-ball.

pstream source archive wherever possible, and packaging the upstream source archive within a separate, self-created orig.tar.gz is a practice to be avoided unless there is a very strong reason for it. I believe this holds true for both the 1.0 and 3.0 source formats. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Exact debhelper dependency with format "3.0 (quilt)"

15 should be fine (I think even 7.0.0 would be fine for the dh7 rules style). Grep the debhelper for the debhelper features you need. That should give you the exact version you should put. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora

if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: backup2l (updated package - new upstream release) (2nd try)

t's where Debian packagers usually host all their Debian packaging VCS repositories. Packaging teams even. See http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth for more information. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411) Ubuntu Contributing Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: themonospot-*

net [5] https://alioth.debian.org/users/sebner-guest/ [6] https://launchpad.net/~sebner -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411) Ubuntu Contributing Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: watch nasty hack

; probably stop works. > Anybody knows better solution? > > Thanks for help > > mira > > Try using jconvolver-([0-9.]+)\.tar\.bz2. [0-9.] will match digits and dots, and + means one or more matches. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n work not as expected

This is a good read about GNU Make and the jobserver. http://make.paulandlesley.org/jobserver.html Hopefully this clears up any remaining doubts about -j and --jobserver-fds. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Using ccache with sbuild/schroot

. That way, it won't be lost. In the case of pbuilder, I have this in my .pbuilderrc: # ccache stuff mkdir -p /var/cache/pbuilder/ccache chmod a+w /var/cache/pbuilder/ccache export CCACHE_DIR=/var/cache/pbuilder/ccache export PATH="/usr/lib/ccache:${PATH}" EXTRAPACKAGES=ccache BINDMOUN

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (3rd try)

On Saturday 24,October,2009 07:58 PM, David Bremner wrote: > Chow Loong Jin wrote: > >> [1 ] >> Dear mentors, > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk2-engines-aurora". > >> * Package name: gtk2-engines-aurora >> Version

RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (3rd try)

llab-maint/gtk2-engines-aurora.git - Git repository: git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/gtk2-engines-aurora.git or git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/gtk2-engines-aurora.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411) Ubuntu Co

Re: Using symbols files for C++ libraries?

ckaging sigx nearly drove me nuts. In the end I removed the symbols files anyway since it wasn't practical to maintain them. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: NMU for libkarma (Rio Karma tools)?

braries Team? That would take care of the whole libkarma being unmaintained issue. If Harald would join the team, he can maintain it there, and if he's busy someone else, myself included, could fill in for him. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411) Ubuntu Contributing Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: script-with-language-extension

ng the Debian Python New Policy[1] and getting help from #debian-python on OFTC or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: script-with-language-extension

shouldn't have language extensions (.py, .pl, .sh, etc), by the way. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Skipping the upload of *.deb and *.changes files to m.d.n

Cheers, J.M. > > .changes needs to be signed and uploaded. If you wish to save bandwidth, generate your .changes file using debuild -S (builds a source package). -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Test of a package on a specific architecture

ny 32 bit cpus around which support virtualization?! Are there any that don't? -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: codelite

ount of time to get around with codelite (it is not just > to take a look at debian/ directory;-), hence I would think trice what would > be the best course to take before even touch the keyboard ;-) This means that > I'd be very happy if another sponsor takes time to review and hopefully > upload > codelite, while I'll take care of codeblocks when packagers enter the scene, > once again. Nonetheless, I promise to take a look at codelite too at some > point, but can't promise to upload. I'll continue poking the list then. Thanks for your time. :-) -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: khdrecord

was that updated? > Taken from http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.8.3.0/changelog, -- Russ Allbery Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:13:26 -0700 -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: codelite

sable all invocations of uscan) >> >> Also, if you upload this package, please use the tarball I've uploaded >> into mentors.debian.net, as that's the same one that's used in Ubuntu's >> CodeLite package. If you regenerate the dfsg tarball and use that >> instead, there will be tarball mismatch issues. > > Sure, that is fine. Let's see when I can find some time to look at it more > closely. Meanwhile, engaging more reviewers would be very nice, in fact. Does that mean I should keep firing off RFS emails at intervals to look for reviewers? -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: codelite

n.net, as that's the same one that's used in Ubuntu's CodeLite package. If you regenerate the dfsg tarball and use that instead, there will be tarball mismatch issues. Thanks for your time and attention! :-) -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: codelite

c/codelite/codelite_1.0.2893+dfsg-1.dsc In addition, this package is already in Ubuntu -- http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/codelite I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks in advance. Kind regards Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (third try)

k2-engines-aurora - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk2-engines-aurora/gtk2-engines-aurora_1.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Kind regards, Chow Loon

Re: pbuilder: The following packages have unmet dependencies

> aptitude is already the newest version. > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > > > Thanks for hints It means aptitude is broken again and you'll have to wait for someone to fix it before you can update your pbuilder. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: problem with git-buildpackage ... I'm missing something

that this is the first Debian release of ocaml-minisat 0.3, then your version number should be 0.3-1. However, since your version 0.3 (without the dash, and the debian revision) it gets generated as a debian native package instead, and git-buildpackage ignores your upstream directory. -- Kind regar

Re: ldconfig symlink issue

n about a lintian tag by running: $ lintian-info -t http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html is a good read, by the way. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (2nd try)

e contacted upstream sometime back, before my first RFS request. There was no reply. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411) Ubuntu Contributing Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (2nd try)

that could come from it. I'm rather curious to hear the opinion of a DD though. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin (GPG: 0x8F02A411) Ubuntu Contributing Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora (2nd try)

k2-engines-aurora - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk2-engines-aurora/gtk2-engines-aurora_1.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Kind regards, Chow Loon

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS set but dh_strip doesn't notice that?

I forgot to mention earlier, but generally rather than not stripping binaries, you should consider creating a debug package, like foo-dbg or something. Then when you strip the package, do: dh_strip --dbg-package=foo-dbg -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS set but dh_strip doesn't notice that?

ch causes > dh_strip to strip it? > 2) what should I do, or look, in order to have the binaries not > stripped? You'll need to export it. Something like this: export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS = debug nostrip -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RFS: gtk2-engines-aurora

k2-engines-aurora - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk2-engines-aurora/gtk2-engines-aurora_1.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Kind regards, Chow Loon

Re: Help with svn-buildpackage

stream contents in your git repository. On the other hand, however, pristine-tar won't work well with it. -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps

e dependent. Perhaps you meant 'Arch: all'? -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: CDBS+get_orig_source+zip_file(2 deep)

and my > watch file. > Any clues? This[1] is an Ubuntu resource, but it's pretty conformant all the same. The unzipping part you'll have to figure out yourself. The unzip and tar manpages would be a good read, I'd reckon. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Examples/Changi

Re: non-native package versions

ed in each distribution separately. I cannot see how this would disrupt your existing workflow in any way. -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: non-native package versions

dist' in the configured source directory. If you don't, well, you're on your own (hint: tar --exclude=debian if all else fails). > [...] -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: autotools cdbs class and autoconf

On Friday 26,June,2009 02:48 AM, Michał Jaszczyk wrote: > 2009/6/25 Chow Loong Jin : >> On Friday 26,June,2009 02:31 AM, Michał Jaszczyk wrote: >>> I'd like to create a package that uses CDBS. I thought I could use the >>> autotools.mk class but it assumes that con

Re: RFS: drcom-pum

ply, the override targets appear in >> debhelper 7.0.50 (or, usually, 7.2.x), not just 7. >> >> G'luck, >> Peter >> >> -- >> Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.netr...@space.bgr...@freebsd.org >> PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc >> Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 >> This sentence was in the past tense. >> > > -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: mount-systray

ght now, it is a native package. IMHO, it is not. :) Matthew Palmer's debian-mentors FAQ[1] is a good read, by the way. Scroll down to the section "What is the difference between a native Debian package and a non-native package?" [1] http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Generating lintian-overrides file?

On Thursday 25,June,2009 06:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Chow Loong Jin wrote: > >> You could, but I am not aware of any lintian tag specifying the version >> of the package in it. Could you post the output of lintian exactly? > > Sorry, I think you misunderstood.

Re: Generating lintian-overrides file?

in it. Could you post the output of lintian exactly? -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: CDBS - how to source a shell fragement before running ./configure?

; > Carsten > Perhaps I'm missing something, but is your script meant to just export environment variables? If that is so, why don't you just add a bunch of export statements at the top of your debian/rules? -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: trouble with packaging

er but I may be > totally off here) debian/package_name for single-binary packages, debian/tmp for multi-binary packages. dh_install looks into debian/tmp by default, starting from debian/compat >= 7. -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RFS: sigx (second attempt)

tweb: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sigx.git - git clone git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/sigx.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Kind Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RFS: sigx (second attempt)

.0.2-1.dsc - gitweb: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sigx.git - git clone git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/sigx.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chow Loong Jin -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: make in pbuilder error

gt; > It's not linking. The compile command is missing some flags which are -lpthread, and -lsomethingelse, but I'm not sure what that somethingelse is. Or perhaps it's missing an object file. There's too little information to tell. How about that particular section of output when it actually succeeds? -- Regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: pdebuild, not removing build environment

On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 13:57 +0300, Eric Pozharski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:14:07AM +0000, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 11:39 +0300, Eric Pozharski wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:36:50AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > > > On

Re: pdebuild, not removing build environment

On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 11:39 +0300, Eric Pozharski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:36:50AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 18:21 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:51:35PM +0200, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: > > > &

Re: pdebuild, not removing build environment

r a build (only if there's a failure), it'll drop to a Bash prompt within the chroot, whereby you can head to /tmp/buildd/ and examine why things went the way they did. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: pdebuild, not removing build environment

the error occurs. Not possible. At least, it's not documented in the manpage, or I've missed it out. If you want, you can spawn a shell if build fails, before pbuilder wipes out using a hook. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: upload to git.debian.org

On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 18:25 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > alioth:~$ cd /git/pkg-multimedia > alioth:/git/pkg-multmedia$ ./setup-repository > alioth:/git/pkg-multimedia$ ^D > local:~$ git clone ssh://usern...@git.debian.org/git/.git > local:~$ cd > ## do stuff! No wait, not g

Re: upload to git.debian.org

On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 12:16 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 12:03 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:34:17 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > >> > >> > >>> In most c

Re: upload to git.debian.org

On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 12:03 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 17:34:17 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > > In most cases I think a setup-repository script exists > > in /git/projectname. I know it does for pkg-cli-* and collab-maint. > > It only exists on

Re: upload to git.debian.org

gt; mkdir public_git > > cd public_git > > mkdir NEWDIR.git > > cd NEWDIR.git > > git init --bare --shared=all > > sensible-editor description > > > > > Ah, I think this is what I'm looking for. > > Thanks. > > \r > > In most cases I think a setup-repository script exists in /git/projectname. I know it does for pkg-cli-* and collab-maint. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: /doc and/or manpage

and install it, I got no manpage... > >> > > You're also calling dh_installman in debian/rules? > > > > Jan > > > > > I use cdbs, so I don't know how it is managed... > > \r > > You need a package.manpages file listing all your manpages. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: warning messages

hey use none of its symbols). ^^ Refer to the thread about -Wl,--as-needed in debian-mentors. > dh_gencontrol > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends} ^^ Can be safely ignored. Basically means that the said libraries do not have any shared lib dependencies. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: pbuilder and building a package twice in a row with hook-skript?

able for use inside the hook? > I'd test it if I were you. And sorry for wording it wrongly, but I also meant pbuilder. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Using a pbuilder hook to test install/remove process

binary package? I think you should look at the lintian hook example in /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples. That could possibly be copied and modified to use piuparts. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: pbuilder and building a package twice in a row with hook-skript?

;s all built in the same buildd I should think. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: double slash

t; > But I can see from install process that files like this was installed. > > e.g. > /tmp/buildd/slv2-0.6.2/debian/slv2/usr/share/doc/slv2/files.html > > Any idea what can be wrong? > > regards > > mira > > It could have been clobbered. I think you should spawn a shell just before the buildd is wiped (if you're using a pbuilder, use a hook) and poke around the said folder. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: double slash

there should be a slash in there. > > -- > Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> > > Looking at where the extra / is, I'd think more like: pkgincludedir = $(includedir)/slv2 rather than pkgincludedir = $(includedir)slv2 -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: double slash

ielding files > like: > > /tmp/buildd/slv2-0.6.2/debian/slv2/usr/include//slv2/pluginclass.h > > Can be double slash behind include problem? Doesn't matter. It'll still resolve to the same path. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: How to get an sponsor (need a bit more info)

you, and if there isn't, it'll be uploaded, after which you will be contacted by your sponsor to notify you that it has been uploaded. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: copyright, authors of little files in app

e and add results into > debian/copyright. It works very well :) I think 'licensecheck' which is in the devscripts package would serve you well. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RFS: remuco-server (edited to fill in missing information)

is a source package that does not contain the precompiled binary .jar that was discussed previously here and in debian-legal. The .jar was released separately in "remuco-client", which I will be packaging separately in hopes of getting it into contrib. Kind regards -- Chow Loong Jin s

RFS: remuco-server

ontrib. Kind regards -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 14:43 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:30:35 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > > > > AFAICS the source package contains the source for > > > gnapplet but it's not built but the pre-compiled .sis is installed > > > into

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

s for it. I'll just install the said .jar into /usr/share/doc/remuco-base then. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

ey need to download and upload to their phone, and possibly wget it as well. Either that or put details about this in README.Debian. Supposing I do either one of the above, would it still go into contrib, or can it go into main? -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

ution of binaries without sources. This is a binary with the source, but cannot be compiled due to a non-free build-dependency. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

distributing precompiled binaries

un.com/products/sjwtoolkit/ [2] https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewLicense-Start -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RFS: sigx

net/ubuntu/+source/sigx I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Building localy

On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:38 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > Od: Chow Loong Jin > > > I don't get it. debhelper should already pull in the appropriate perl. I > > cannot even begin to imagine how you borked up your perl installation to > > that extent. > >

Re: Building localy

pbuilder chroot? > > The first section here might help: > http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks > > Kumar > -- > Kumar > > I don't get it. debhelper should already pull in the appropriate perl. I cannot even begin to imagine how you borked up your perl insta

Re: Building localy

On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:07 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > No I will use -fakeroot Actually I thought it was -rfakeroot -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 14:00 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > >> > >> 1) "It's known not to work on FreeBSD and probably does not work on other > >> non-Linux targets." > >> > &

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

t too sure about the whole breaking-on-other-archs issue. I've got some packages with the ltmain.sh as needed patch, and -Wl,--as-needed in LDFLAGS, and they built on all the target architectures[1]. [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/geanyvc/0.4-0ubuntu1 -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

tp://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > In that case would I be right in summarizing this up as --as-needed causes issues only when dlopen is used where the dlopen'd library requires symbols that are linked in via -lsomelibrary? -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: nautilus-share (updated package + bugfixes)

0.7.2-3 now. Fixed icon names in 04_use_correct_icon.patch. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: nautilus-share (updated package + bugfixes)

On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 01:17 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.2-1 > of my package "nautilus-share". > > It builds these binary packages: > nautilus-share - Nautilus extension to share folder using Sa

Re: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on.... (they use none of its symbols)

to be fixed the right way, talk to the > GTK+ maintainers in Debian and upstream. > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html > > -- > bye, > pabs > > http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > Regarding -Wl,--as-needed, sometimes you may need to patch ltmain.sh

Re: Building library from source

ltimedia Maintainers > ": secret key not > available > gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available > > regards > > mira > > Regarding the GPG issue, when you upload (entry in debian/changelog) sign off as yourself, not as pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Building library from source

ilder environment, then look at the contents of debian/tmp. It should show you what files you should match. The asterisks are fine. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Building library from source

ntian ...clean output. > Problem is that library installing just .docs files no .so files. > I've checked everything many times. > > What I forgot to check? > > regards > > mira > > Oh sorry, if you're not installing .so files, then remove ${shlibs:Depends

Re: Building library from source

ntian ...clean output. > Problem is that library installing just .docs files no .so files. > I've checked everything many times. > > What I forgot to check? > > regards > > mira > > I think you probably need to run dh_shlibdeps in debian/rules. -- Chow Loong Jin

RFS: nautilus-share (updated package + bugfixes)

hare_0.7.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: quilt[Solved]... bug?

t; I know d'n'd is not standard way how to do it, but it took one day to me to > discover it :( > > Thank you all for patience and will to help. > > Best regards > > mira > > I'm not sure, maybe quilt doesn't support full paths? Either way you can always use tab completion. Type the first few characters and then press tab and it'll be completed for you. I think that's possibly faster than drag-dropping especially when the stuff is in the same directory. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: manual pages

But when I install package there are not man pages,also lintian complain ... > > W: jnoise: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/jnoise > > Thanks for advise > > mira > > You need to add debian/jnoise.1 into debian/packagename.manpages. If it doesn't exist, create it. -

  1   2   >