Hi,
On 11.09.2012 16:48, Eugene Seliverstov wrote:
> I prefered .dfsg variant for consistent versioning. Repackaging original
> tarball
> with removing PDF files leads to use of 'dfsg1' prefix so now full version is
> '0.9.21.dfsg1-1'.
Your version is acceptable as it is larger than 0.9.21.dfsg
Hi Eugene,
On 05.09.2012 14:45, Eugene Seliverstov wrote:
> I have some questions about versioning scheme.
> Package is based on latest 0.9.21.dfsg-4 and includes all of these changes.
> But I reseted (maybe incorrectly) a numbering due to use '+dfsg' prefix
> instead of '.dfsg'.
> 1. Is it okay
2 matches
Mail list logo
