Hello,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:11:10 +0200
Javier Sancho wrote:
> Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> > i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel?
> The goal of the IceCat project is to provide a completely free version
> of the popular Mozilla source code.
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:44 +0200
Javier Sancho wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "icecat".
i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel?
ii) Why doesn't your package use pre-existing XULRunner in Debian?
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: P
Hello,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:19:44 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
> roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
> roxterm-common: All the other files
An off-topic question: why've you chosen this naming scheme? Why
'legacy'? In particula
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'bmake'.
* Package name: bmake
Version : 20110622-1
Upstream Author : Simon J. Gerraty
* URL : http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.htm
* License : BSD
Section : devel
It builds this binary package:
b
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:46:48 +0300
"Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote:
> ix) Vcs-* fields. Put your packaging under version control and upload
> it to Alioth using whatever VCS you like (it may be Git or Mercurial
> or anything else). There are some tools which simplify (o
Hello Vitaly,
I'm glad to see you're going to maintain tkpath, as it's really useful
piece of software (and I thought of making a package myself once).
However, your packaging ([1]) has some problems which would be good to
fix.
Also, I'm not a DD so I can't upload, sorry :)
Well, let's start. S
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:21:05 +0200
Kilian Krause wrote:
> > > 5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
> > >W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
> > >W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink
> > > usr/lib/libtnat64.so.0.1 usr/lib/libtnat64.so I: tnat64:
>
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:18:50 +0200
Kilian Krause wrote:
> > > >> >Isn't really relevant, as this is a LD_PRELOAD-able library.
> this discussion about moving a shared lib into private namespace is
> somewhat puzzling me. If the code it provides is only used internally
> - why not link it
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:12 +0200
"SZERB, Tamas" wrote:
> >> * Andrew O. Shadoura , 2011-06-30, 00:30:
> >> >> 5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
> >> >> W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
>
Hello,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:39:31 +0200
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andrew O. Shadoura , 2011-06-30, 00:30:
> >> 5. Lintian issues (lintian -iI --pedantic):
> >>W: tnat64: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtnat64-0.1
> >>W: tnat64: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-sym
Hello,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:11:56 -0500
Elías Alejandro wrote:
> I am not a DD, so I can't sponsor your contribution. I'm sorry. But
> here my fast review about your package:
> 1. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
Yes, I know.
> 2. Maybe you can use debhelper version 8 under: debian/compat,
>
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:38:16 +0100
Luis Henriques wrote:
> > Upgrading zlib1g-dev from 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14 to
> > 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 helped, however.
> First of all, thanks for testing the package (it actually the first
> time I try to build a debian package).
> Anyway, I'm not sure where t
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:33:45 +0300
"Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm".
> FTBFS here:
Upgrading zlib1g-dev from 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14 to
1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 helped, however.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:03:14 +0100
Luis Henriques wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm".
FTBFS here:
$ dpkg-buildpackage -b
dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: export CPPFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (orig
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:56:00 +0200
Maxime Chatelle wrote:
> > Ah I see where that comes from. Those packages with tarball-in-
> > tarball
> > are rather rare these days. Changing the tarball without renaming it
> > won't technically work however. You can still rename the tarball to
> > so
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:40 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
> > debian/copyright.
> Which format are you talking about? The "old good traditional
> format" is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had
> all sorts
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 01:05:02 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> P.S: What's blocking DEP5 from reaching the policy?
> I think it's great the way it is right now already...
Isn't it way too machine-oriented to be in the policy?
It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:10:35 +0200
Stefan Ott wrote:
> - Port id3v2 to libid3tag [5]. This is a different id3 tagging library
> which supports v2.4 tags. I did some work in this direction but I
> realized that this would require major modifications to id3v2 since
> it's closely modeled ar
Hello,
On Sun, 15 May 2011 17:19:22 +0200
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >>rm -rf debian/icons
> >You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
> However, you can't remove directories via debian/clean, and I assume
> that debian/icons is a directory.
You can remove debian/icons
Hello,
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:05:01 +0400
Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> override_dh_auto_clean:
> dh_auto_clean
> rm -rf debian/icons
> rm -f retext
> rm -f wpgen/wpgen
>
> Dmitry Shachnev
You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;)
--
WBR, Andrew
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mcs".
* Package name: mcs
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : William Pitcock
* URL : http://www.atheme.org/projects/mcs
* License : BSD
Section : libs
It builds these binary packages:
libmcs-backend
Hello,
On Tue, 3 May 2011 23:24:18 +0300
"Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote:
> Why don't you just becoma a maintainer of it in Debian too?
Become, even. Anyway, it'd be easier to keep the two packages in sync.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Tue, 3 May 2011 23:37:13 +0700
Maia Kozheva wrote:
> Any progress on this? There is also a gtk2-engines-equinox package in
> Ubuntu already (I packaged it independently before that); perhaps it
> would be worth basing your package on that instead of reinventing the
> wheel?
Why don't
Hello,
On Mon, 2 May 2011 17:07:01 +0200
Markus Becker wrote:
[ I'm not a DD, but I'd like to share some my ideas about your RFS,
however. ]
> * Package name: socketcan
> Version : 0.0.1+svn1240-1
> Upstream Author : Volkswagen Group Electronic Research
> Wolfgang Grande
Hello,
On Mon, 2 May 2011 13:50:08 +0200
Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
> mactelnet-client - Console tools for telneting and pinging via MAC
> addresses
> mactelnet-server - Telnet daemon for accepting connections
> via MAC addresses
My opinion is that the description is a bit messy. You don't 'accep
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'tnat64'.
* Package name: tnat64
Version : 0.02-1
Upstream Author : Andrew O. Shadoura
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/andrew_shadoura/tnat64/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:58:32 +0200
"Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "twms".
Sorry, of course I mean "tayga". But if you want to sponsor "twms" as
well... you know :)
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "twms".
* Package name: tayga
Version : 0.9-1
Upstream Author : Nathan Lutchansky
* URL : http://www.litech.org/tayga/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
ta
Hello.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "twms".
* Package name: twms
Version : 0.01q-1
Upstream Author : Darafei Praliaskouski
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/twms
* License : GPL-3+
Section : science
It builds these binary
Hello.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "twms".
* Package name: twms
Version : 0.01q-1
Upstream Author : Darafei Praliaskouski
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/twms
* License : GPL-3+
Section : science
It builds these binary
Hello.
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 18:36:16 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Ok a few short remarks after a first look:
> * There are a lot of commented out lines in debian/rules - need them or
> delete them. ;)
Ok, removed most of them.
> * Is there a reason to build-dep on tcl 8.4? Otherwise build-dep
Hello.
The previous maintainer on tclxml package orphaned it, while package has a bug
rendering it completely unusable, and there's a new upstream version available
with that bug fixed.
I'd like to take over maintainance, and I need a sponsor for that.
Package name: tclxml
Version: 3.2-1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libnatspec".
* Package name: libnatspec
Version : 0.2.5-1
Upstream Authors: Vitaly Lipatov ,
Pavel Vainerman
* URL : http://natspec.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL2.1
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libnatspec".
* Package name: libnatspec
Version : 0.2.5-1
Upstream Authors: Vitaly Lipatov ,
Pavel Vainerman
* URL : http://natspec.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL2.1
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdigi".
* Package name: gdigi
Version : 0.1.8.hg-1
Upstream Author : Tomasz Moń
* URL : http://desowin.org/gdigi
* License : GPLv3
Section : sound
It builds these binary packages:
gdigi -
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdigi/gdigi_0.1.8~hg-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Andrew O. Shadoura
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
36 matches
Mail list logo
