Re: OpenEXR beta packages.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:30:32PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > They are lintian clean, but linda reports an odd error. Let me guess, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/debian-devel/active% linda -i libopenexr0_1.0.4-1_i386.deb X: libopenexr0; Package name doesn't contain one of the SONAMEs. This packa

Re: OpenEXR beta packages.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:30:32PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > They are lintian clean, but linda reports an odd error. Let me guess, netsnipe@espresso:/usr/src/debian-devel/active% linda -i libopenexr0_1.0.4-1_i386.deb X: libopenexr0; Package name doesn't contain one of the SONAMEs. This packa

RFS for a NMU: Balsa 2.0.4

Hey everyone, I know it's a bit weird for a NM to request a NMU, but Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has given me the good ahead to get a NMU done for Balsa since the version in unstable (1.2) is very far behind the two available trees (1.4 and 2.0) now. The OpenSSL linking issue has also be

RFS for a NMU: Balsa 2.0.4

Hey everyone, I know it's a bit weird for a NM to request a NMU, but Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has given me the good ahead to get a NMU done for Balsa since the version in unstable (1.2) is very far behind the two available trees (1.4 and 2.0) now. The OpenSSL linking issue has also be

Re: ifeq( PACKAGE, "mypackage")

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:50:18AM +, Mark Howard wrote: > so that only the parts required for the current package are built? > (and also so that they aren't build twice). Isn't upstream's Makefile doing its job properly in only building something that doesn't exist instead of rebuilding every

Re: ifeq( PACKAGE, "mypackage")

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:50:18AM +, Mark Howard wrote: > so that only the parts required for the current package are built? > (and also so that they aren't build twice). Isn't upstream's Makefile doing its job properly in only building something that doesn't exist instead of rebuilding every

Re: How to change file owner for deb packages properly?

On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi > chown: `netsaint': invalid user > I have seen several packages which do this and fail, > and what is the proper way to fix that ? postinst? Yours sincerely, A

Re: How to change file owner for deb packages properly?

On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:36:07PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > chown netsaint debian/netsaint-neat/usr/lib/cgi-bin/netsaint/neat.cgi > chown: `netsaint': invalid user > I have seen several packages which do this and fail, > and what is the proper way to fix that ? postinst? Yours sincerely, A

Re: RFS: Film Gimp 0.11-1

Thanks to Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for sponsoring Film Gimp 0.11-2. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau -- --- * Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW * * # apt-get into

Re: RFS: Film Gimp 0.11-1

Thanks to Andrew Stribblehill for sponsoring Film Gimp 0.11-2. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau -- --- * Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW * * # apt-get into it

RFS: Film Gimp 0.11-1

Hi again everyone, Just going through the motions. Another regular new release. Thanks to anyone who sponsors this yet again. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau URL: deb http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/ ./ Description: A motion picture editing and retouching tool Film Gimp is the m

Re: RFS: tsclient-0.74 (GNOME 2 RDP client)

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:21:35PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > Hi everyone, > New upstream for tsclient, now 0.74. Lintian/Linda error > free. Builds under pbuilder. GnuPG signed. You know the drill. Thanks > in advanced to any sponsors. Sincere thanks to Rob Bradford for spo

RFS: Film Gimp 0.11-1

Hi again everyone, Just going through the motions. Another regular new release. Thanks to anyone who sponsors this yet again. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau URL: deb http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/ ./ Description: A motion picture editing and retouching tool Film Gimp is the m

Re: RFS: tsclient-0.74 (GNOME 2 RDP client)

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:21:35PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > Hi everyone, > New upstream for tsclient, now 0.74. Lintian/Linda error > free. Builds under pbuilder. GnuPG signed. You know the drill. Thanks > in advanced to any sponsors. Sincere thanks to Rob Bradford for spo

RFS: tsclient-0.74 (GNOME 2 RDP client)

Hi everyone, New upstream for tsclient, now 0.74. Lintian/Linda error free. Builds under pbuilder. GnuPG signed. You know the drill. Thanks in advanced to any sponsors. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau URL: deb http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/debian/ ./ Description: Windows Termin

RFS: tsclient-0.74 (GNOME 2 RDP client)

Hi everyone, New upstream for tsclient, now 0.74. Lintian/Linda error free. Builds under pbuilder. GnuPG signed. You know the drill. Thanks in advanced to any sponsors. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau URL: deb http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/debian/ ./ Description: Windows Termin

Re: fceu sponsorship

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:24:18PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote: > > > Fix all that and get back to me with -3, and I'll sponsor it if everything > It could be that debuild runs fakeroot whereas dpkg-buildpackage > does not; if dpkg-buildpackage is passed -rfakeroot, it will build > the package just fi

Re: RFS: GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager (gcm & gcm-applet)

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:56:46PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > Two source packages for sponsorship, gcm and gcm-applet, both part > of the GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager. My sincere thanks goes out to Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for having sponsored these packages. Yours since

Re: fceu sponsorship

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:24:18PM -0800, Sam Powers wrote: > > > Fix all that and get back to me with -3, and I'll sponsor it if everything > It could be that debuild runs fakeroot whereas dpkg-buildpackage > does not; if dpkg-buildpackage is passed -rfakeroot, it will build > the package just fi

Re: RFS: GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager (gcm & gcm-applet)

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:56:46PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote: > Two source packages for sponsorship, gcm and gcm-applet, both part > of the GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager. My sincere thanks goes out to Andrew Stribblehill for having sponsored these packages. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Ne

RFS: GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager (gcm & gcm-applet)

Hi everyone, Two source packages for sponsorship, gcm and gcm-applet, both part of the GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager. Lintian and Linda error free, builds successfully under pbuilder and have been GnuPG signed. URL: deb http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/debian/ ./ Description: Utility to manag

RFS: GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager (gcm & gcm-applet)

Hi everyone, Two source packages for sponsorship, gcm and gcm-applet, both part of the GNOME 2 Clipboard Manager. Lintian and Linda error free, builds successfully under pbuilder and have been GnuPG signed. URL: deb http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/debian/ ./ Description: Utility to manag

RFS (2nd call): tsclient-0.56

Hey everyone, Robster still hasn't uploaded tsclient 0.56 since promising to sponsor/upload it on Sunday, so my RFS still stands, and is repeated below. Thanks in advanced to anyone who picks it up. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau - Forwarded message from And

RFS (2nd call): tsclient-0.56

Hey everyone, Robster still hasn't uploaded tsclient 0.56 since promising to sponsor/upload it on Sunday, so my RFS still stands, and is repeated below. Thanks in advanced to anyone who picks it up. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau - Forwarded message from And

Sponsor required: Film Gimp 0.8a-3

filmgimp-dev_0.8a-3_i386.deb 68K libfilmgimp_0.8a-3_i386.deb Thanks in advance, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau - Forwarded message from Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Official Film Gimp 0.8a-3 packages f

Sponsor required: Film Gimp 0.8a-3

filmgimp-dev_0.8a-3_i386.deb 68K libfilmgimp_0.8a-3_i386.deb Thanks in advance, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau - Forwarded message from Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Official Film Gimp 0.8a-3 packages f

Incorrect .changes for cupsys-pt on auric

On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it > needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human > intervention. It may take a few days. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther Hi, Thanks again for sponsoring/

Incorrect .changes for cupsys-pt on auric

On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it > needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human > intervention. It may take a few days. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther Hi, Thanks again for sponsoring/

Re: Sponsorship request: cupsys-pt

On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:26:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Hello, > > please tell me why you needed to patch the config.guess and > config.sub thingy ? Could the plain upstream provided ones not do > the job ? > Friendly, > > Sven Luther After further testing, it seems like it is im

Re: Sponsorship request: cupsys-pt

On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:26:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Hello, > > please tell me why you needed to patch the config.guess and > config.sub thingy ? Could the plain upstream provided ones not do > the job ? > Friendly, > > Sven Luther After further testing, it seems like it is im

Re: Sponsorship request: cupsys-pt

On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:26:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > Hello, > > please tell me why you needed to patch the config.guess and config.sub > thingy ? Could the plain upstream prov

Sponsorship request: cupsys-pt

Hey everyone, Package: cupsys-pt Version: 1.0.2-1 Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libcupsys2-dev (>= 1.1.4), libgtk1.2-dev (>= 1.2.10) Description: GTK+ tool for viewing/managing print jobs in CUPS pt is a configurable printing tool written in C/GTK+ for viewing and managing print jobs of

Sponsorship request: cupsys-pt

Hey everyone, Package: cupsys-pt Version: 1.0.2-1 Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libcupsys2-dev (>= 1.1.4), libgtk1.2-dev (>= 1.2.10) Description: GTK+ tool for viewing/managing print jobs in CUPS pt is a configurable printing tool written in C/GTK+ for viewing and managing print jobs of

Please sponsor my buildd fixes to python-expect and python-twofish

Dear Fred, Thanks once again for coming to the aid of my sponsorship request on debian-mentors a few days ago. A problem has arisen though which both of us failed to notice however. The configure scripts for both my python packages (python-twofish and python-expect) search for /usr/bin/pyth

Please sponsor my buildd fixes to python-expect and python-twofish

Dear Fred, Thanks once again for coming to the aid of my sponsorship request on debian-mentors a few days ago. A problem has arisen though which both of us failed to notice however. The configure scripts for both my python packages (python-twofish and python-expect) search for /usr/bin/pyt

Re: Sponsorship: esshsh, python-twofish, python-expect

Dear Fredrik, Thanks a lot for the very prompt sponsorship/upload. I owe you in future. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau -- --- * Andrew 'Netsnipe' Lau Computer Science & Sturep, UNSW * * "a

Re: Sponsorship: esshsh, python-twofish, python-expect

Dear Fredrik, Thanks a lot for the very prompt sponsorship/upload. I owe you in future. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau -- --- * Andrew 'Netsnipe' Lau Computer Science & Sturep, UNSW * * "

Sponsorship: esshsh, python-twofish, python-expect

Here's a quick rundown: python-twofish and python-expect have bugfixes and esshsh is new upstream. 320k worth of tarballs all 3 are lintian clean and installed/purge tested and afaict, conform with the current python policy I've passed everything except

Sponsorship: esshsh, python-twofish, python-expect

Here's a quick rundown: python-twofish and python-expect have bugfixes and esshsh is new upstream. 320k worth of tarballs all 3 are lintian clean and installed/purge tested and afaict, conform with the current python policy I've passed everything excep