Re: What to do if upstream downlaod location disappears?

Hi Matthew, Thanks a lot for your response! I shall proceed accordingly. Cheers, Andree On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:51:24AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: >On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:19:04AM +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote: >> The '(if any)' makes me think I can amend the copyr

What to do if upstream downlaod location disappears?

Debian archives. Would this be acceptable? Thanks a lot & best regards, Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost @ Debian Developer Sydney - Australia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Please help: Amendments for packages-arch-specific

Hi Goswin, Thanks for your response. On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 15:50 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages >

Please help: Amendments for packages-arch-specific

---- From: Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fwd: Amendments for packages-arch-specific] Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:30:46 +1000 Hi Lamont, I sent the message below a while ago. I noticed that you changed the Packages-arch-specific file on 8 May, so I

Re: Help needed with architectures getting ignored

Hi Justin, Thanks a lot for your help. I've send a message to James to get this amended. I had read but obviously not understood the implications mentioned in 5.10.4 from the Developer's Reference. Thanks again and best regards, Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia sig

Help needed with architectures getting ignored

n any other architecture right at the moment.) It would be great if you could let me know what I am overlooking here and what I need to do to get the other architectures built by the autobuilders. Thank you very much & best regards, Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia si

Advice sought regarding binaries in upstream source

amp; best regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Advice sought regarding binaries in upstream source

amp; best regards Andree -- Andree Leidenfrost Sydney - Australia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Question reagarding new package

Dear Mentors I received an email today from ftp-master telling me that there is a licence issue with the package. Don't know whether this was triggered by my posting. But anyway, this is resolved. Thanks for your time & best regards Andree On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 00:13, Andree Leidenfr

Re: Question reagarding new package

Dear Mentors I received an email today from ftp-master telling me that there is a licence issue with the package. Don't know whether this was triggered by my posting. But anyway, this is resolved. Thanks for your time & best regards Andree On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 00:13, Andree Leidenfr

Question reagarding new package

about this? How should I go about this in general? (I'm aware that the archive maintainers are probably flat out due to the Sarge frenzy, but this isn't about a stand-alone new package but something that an existing package depends on in its latest version.) Thanks a lot & best r

Question reagarding new package

about this? How should I go about this in general? (I'm aware that the archive maintainers are probably flat out due to the Sarge frenzy, but this isn't about a stand-alone new package but something that an existing package depends on in its latest version.) Thanks a lot & best r