On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
> It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
> conflict with git or with cgvg.
>
> I made a note about this in /usr/share/doc/cogito/README.Debian, and I
>
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> > >
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
> > >
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
>* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5 sponsors.
Read the list archives. You'll find that this person might never be allo
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> 2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
>* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5 sponsors.
Read the list archives. You'll find that this person might never be allo
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
>sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
>asking upstream to change the source tarball?
You can rename the source tarball when uploading to debian. No problem
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote:
> 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is
>sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than
>asking upstream to change the source tarball?
You can rename the source tarball when uploading to debian. No proble
On 26 Nov 2001, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:16:27PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:59:03PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > The problem is that I have a debian native packa
On 26 Nov 2001, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:16:27PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:59:03PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > The problem is that I have a debian native pack
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > #define __NR_olduname 109
> > #define __NR_iopl /* 110 */ not supported
> > #define __NR_vhangup111
> > #define __NR_idle /* 112 */ Obsolete
> > #define __NR_vm86
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > #define __NR_olduname 109
> > #define __NR_iopl /* 110 */ not supported
> > #define __NR_vhangup111
> > #define __NR_idle /* 112 */ Obsolete
> > #define __NR_vm86
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > #define __NR_olduname 109
> > #define __NR_iopl /* 110 */ not supported
> > #define __NR_vhangup111
> > #define __NR_idle /* 112 */ Obsolete
> > #define __NR_vm86
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > #define __NR_olduname 109
> > #define __NR_iopl /* 110 */ not supported
> > #define __NR_vhangup111
> > #define __NR_idle /* 112 */ Obsolete
> > #define __NR_vm86
13 matches
Mail list logo
