Bug#1030547: RFS: ghostscript/9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u3 [NMU] -- interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF

2023-02-04 Thread Håvard F . Aasen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ghostscript": * Package name : ghostscript Version : 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u3 Upstream contact : Ghostscript development and discussion * URL : https://www.gho

Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-04 Thread Christoph Hueffelmann
Hello Bastian, sorry, now I understand. I have split the patches, cherry-pick the commits from upstream and reupload it. Thank you for your time and effort. Christoph

Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-04 Thread Christoph Hueffelmann
Hello Bastian, I am very sorry about that. I will do that next time. Thank you for your time and effort. Christoph Am 04.02.23 um 18:07 schrieb Bastian Germann: Hi Christoph, Please do not fold the upstream PR into one patch file. That makes tracking it very hard. Thanks, Bastian

Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-04 Thread Bastian Germann
Hi Christoph, Please do not fold the upstream PR into one patch file. That makes tracking it very hard. Thanks, Bastian

Bug#1030163: marked as done (RFS: ipmiutil/3.1.8-4 -- IPMI management utilities)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2023 17:50:23 +0100 with message-id <72450037-ed99-b6fa-d06a-2a785ce54...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: ipmiutil/3.1.8-4 -- IPMI management utilities has caused the Debian Bug report #1030163, regarding RFS: ipmiutil/3.1.8-4 -- IPMI management utilities to be m

Re: Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

2023-02-04 Thread Soren Stoutner
`UNRELEASED` is used because it will cause a failure if you accidentally try to upload it, which prevents accidental releases before they are intended. At the point of release, you should change it to be `unstable` or `experimental` or a backports repository. On Saturday, February 4, 2023 8:18

Bug#1030390: marked as done (RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-2 -- low level terminal access)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:43:51 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-2 -- low level terminal access has caused the Debian Bug report #1030390, regarding RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-2 -- low level terminal access to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

2023-02-04 Thread min sun
> Hello Min Sun, > > is there a particular reason why you opt for / stick to distribution > `UNRELEASED` for a package already monitored by the tracker?[1] It is the > entry e.g., `dch -i` puts into file `/debian/changelog` when you start to work > on a new version (increment) of a package. Afte

Bug#1030528: RFS: mg/20221112-1

2023-02-04 Thread Harald Dunkel
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi folks, I am looking for a new sponsor for my "mg" package, which is already in Debian and hosted on Salsa. I tried to contact the old sponsor several times, but I got no response. * Package name : mg Version : 20221112-1 Upst