Bug#1017773: Subject: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/0.6-2 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)

2022-08-19 Thread Gioele Barabucci
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsb-release-minimal": * Package name: lsb-release-minimal Version : 0.6-2 Upstream Author : Gioele Barabucci * URL : https://gioele.io/lsb-release-minimal *

Bug#983146: 983146 RFS: bung/3.2.6-3 [ITP] -- backup next generation

2022-08-19 Thread Charles
Dear Bastian Regards "Please use the *.source.tgz as source instead of *.source_with_htm_and_pdf.tgz", I assume you refer to the files at https://github.com/CharlesMAtkinson/bung/releases/tag/3.2.6. If that is not correct, please correct my assumption and disregard the rest of this mail. R

Re: Is valid for Debian a source code not in English? (was Help to know if a package is valid)

2022-08-19 Thread Eriberto
Em sex., 19 de ago. de 2022 às 16:38, Lucas Castro escreveu: > > > Em 16/08/2022 22:50, braulio escreveu: > > On 22/08/05 15:36, braulio wrote: > >> Good afternoon. > >> > >> I need help with a situation. I packaged a program under the GPL-3+ > >> license where Upstream wrote all the texts in its

Re: Is valid for Debian a source code not in English? (was Help to know if a package is valid)

2022-08-19 Thread Lucas Castro
Em 16/08/2022 22:50, braulio escreveu: On 22/08/05 15:36, braulio wrote: Good afternoon. I need help with a situation. I packaged a program under the GPL-3+ license where Upstream wrote all the texts in its native language Pt-Br, and for the packaging, I did all the translation to English,

Bug#1011368: marked as done (RFS: libkdumpfile/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- Kernel coredump file access)

2022-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2022 20:29:59 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1011368: RFS: libkdumpfile/0.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Python bindings for libkdumpfile9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011368, regarding RFS: libkdumpfile/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- Kernel coredump file access to be marke

Bug#1017588: Your autotools copyright question

2022-08-19 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:13:00AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 19.08.22 um 03:41 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim: > > Quick question (applies to drgn, not libkdumpfile) - if the tarball > > contains some m4 rules copied verbatim from autotools, do I have to list > > them in d/copyright? > >

Re: How to Specifically Scan for Existing Bug Tickets?

2022-08-19 Thread Chew, Kean Ho
Hi Mentors, Sorry for bugging. Found out already: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=grub-efi-amd64-signed;package=shim-signed Regards, Holloway On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:58 PM Chew, Kean Ho wrote: > Hi Mentor, > > Quick one, can I specifically scan the bug t

How to Specifically Scan for Existing Bug Tickets?

2022-08-19 Thread Chew, Kean Ho
Hi Mentor, Quick one, can I specifically scan the bug tracking system for existing tickets with patterns? I found 3 bugs related to SecureBoot grub-amd64-signed packages and already narrowed down the scope + reproducible steps. I want to check for existing ones before filing a new one. I'm on the

Bug#983146: 983146 RFS: bung/3.2.6-3 [ITP] -- backup next generation

2022-08-19 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 07.08.22 um 04:34 schrieb Charles: I do not understand the E class item. "usr/share/doc/bung/Backup scripts next generation 3.2.x User Guide.htm" is present in bung_3.2.6.orig.tar.gz The .htm is generated from the corresponding .odt file. Please use the *.source.tgz as source instead of *.so

Bug#1017588: Your autotools copyright question

2022-08-19 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 19.08.22 um 03:41 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim: Quick question (applies to drgn, not libkdumpfile) - if the tarball contains some m4 rules copied verbatim from autotools, do I have to list them in d/copyright? The answer is tricky: Per Debian Policy you have to include every license that