On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:51:12PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Please untag moreinfo when you have provided a version which uns autopkgtest
> successfully.
>
Quick update - been chasing test suite failures that also affect Fedora,
now that 0.5.0 is out we're real
Hi Francisco
On 2022/08/15 11:36, Francisco M Neto wrote:
I have been trying to package packages related to Elemetary OS's
Pantheon for Debian. Several months ago I submitted a few of them to
mentors.d.n, and found sponsors, and those packages got accepted. Then they
entered the NEW queu
FYI a discussion on this with the original poster of this thread devolved into
some swearing on their part off-list and the other reason they're discouraged
is because it was 'rejected' due to a missing d/copyright clause. Which
according to them is "wrong" and "they should have held and waited
Hi Fransico,
* Francisco M Neto [220815 11:36]:
> So, I turn to the mentors present in this discussion list for
> incentive. Should I try again? Is there anything to say?
That's a tough question, and I can see why what happend can be
demotivating. But in the end regardless of what you wi
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:32:43PM +, Thomas Ward wrote:
> When there's a rejected package there should be a rejection reason.
> That's where you should start. Don't be discouraged, I've had my
> packages rejected before (note: I'm not a mentor / DD, but I have been
> through this process befo
When there's a rejected package there should be a rejection reason. That's
where you should start. Don't be discouraged, I've had my packages rejected
before (note: I'm not a mentor / DD, but I have been through this process
before), it hasn't stopped me from contributing anywhere yet. Usuall
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:17:38 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?H=c3=a5vard_F=2e_Aasen?=
wrote:
If it really is the testsuite that is the problem, I can remove it.
Then please do so. Please note that you should not cram too many things into a
NMU.
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:10:24 +0200
with message-id <6267f365-399b-f983-05d6-fc6add584...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: safe/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- library for safe c++ mutexes
(development files)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011406,
regarding RFS: safe/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- libr
Greetings.
I have been trying to package packages related to Elemetary OS's
Pantheon for Debian. Several months ago I submitted a few of them to
mentors.d.n, and found sponsors, and those packages got accepted. Then they
entered the NEW queue. I decided to wait for those packages to make i
Please remove debian/readme as it does not contain additional info.
There are two problems with d/changelog:
Please use the luzip665 name/email for the signature lines
because exaile is obviously not a natural
person.
The "Beta release" description is not true anymore.
Please just write "Rei
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:09:21 + andre-fle...@posteo.de wrote:
Did it by reformating.
Hm... You did not answer where you have got the original from.
This file seems to be very different from d3.js in
https://github.com/d3/d3/releases/download/v3.4.9/d3.zip
Also, plugins/playlistanalyzer/ext
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 07:38:54PM +0100, Peter Blackman wrote:
> Could someone create a project on Salsa under the
> debian namespace for qosmic and grant me write access?
> (I sign in using this email)
Here you go: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/qosmic
(assuming I didn't mess up too
12 matches
Mail list logo