Bug#1010376: RFS: rinetd/0.73-0.1 [NMU] [ITA] -- Internet TCP/UDP redirection server

2022-04-29 Thread Helmar Gerloni
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, The current version of rinetd in Debian is 0.62 from year 2003. I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rinetd": * Package name: rinetd Version : 0.73-0.1 Upstream Author : https://github.com/samhocevar/rinetd/is

Bug#1009658: RFS: ncdu/1.16-0.1 [NMU] -- ncurses disk usage viewer

2022-04-29 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
El 28/04/22 a las 18:17, Christian Göttsche escribió: > Upstream release a new version 1.17. > Prepared a new upload, with d/watch changes and upstream signature added. > > ncdu (1.17-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Non-maintainer upload. >* New upstream version 1.17 (Closes: #996240

Bug#1010354: RFS: libtsm/4.0.2-0.3 [NMU] -- Terminal-emulator State Machine - development

2022-04-29 Thread Victor Westerhuis
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtsm": * Package name: libtsm Version : 4.0.2-0.3 Upstream Author : https://github.com/Aetf/libtsm/issues * URL

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-29 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 29.04.22 um 11:07 schrieb Robin ALEXANDER: As I wrote to you, I: 1. Uploaded on Wednesday (April 27) the corrected versions of odr- dabmux (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/) and odr-dabmod (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/) 2. Removed the moreinfo tag on odr-

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-29 Thread Robin ALEXANDER
Hi Bastian, Thank you for your answer: it is crystal clear! As I wrote to you, I: 1. Uploaded on Wednesday (April 27) the corrected versions of odr- dabmux (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/) and odr-dabmod (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/) 2. Removed the moreinfo

Re: Might failed builds for unofficial ports block migration?

2022-04-29 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2022-04-29 08:17:15, Markus Blatt wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently preparing/testing Debian packages of the upcoming OPM release > by uploading them to experimental. I noted that packages for both hppa and > riscv64 > are failing for this release of opm-common [1] that did build before. riscv6

Re: Might failed builds for unofficial ports block migration?

2022-04-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 08:17:15AM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote: > I am currently preparing/testing Debian packages of the upcoming OPM release > by uploading them to experimental. I noted that packages for both hppa and > riscv64 > are failing for this release of opm-common [1] that did build befor

Bug#1010334: RFS: git-multimail/1.5.0-1 [ITP] -- git-multimail is a tool for sending notification emails on pushes

2022-04-29 Thread Bo YU
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, Sorry, due to previous email mismatch pseudo-header, the debian tracker system does not deal with the bug report,so send again. I am looking for a sponsor for my package "git-multimail": * Package name: git-multimail Version

Might failed builds for unofficial ports block migration?

2022-04-29 Thread Markus Blatt
Hi, I am currently preparing/testing Debian packages of the upcoming OPM release by uploading them to experimental. I noted that packages for both hppa and riscv64 are failing for this release of opm-common [1] that did build before. riscv64 [2] might be a compiler issue of g++-12 and hence no