Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opencpn":
* Package name: opencpn
Version : 5.6.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Dave S. Register
* URL : https://opencpn.org
* License : GPL-3+, public-do
On 2022-04-25 17:16:35, Tino Mettler wrote:
> Hi, Antoine,
>
> I run autopkgtest after the build process with the following result:
>
> # autopkgtest ./ -- qemu autopkgtest-unstable.img
> autopkgtest [15:05:05]: starting date: 2022-04-25
> autopkgtest [15:05:05]: version 5.21
> autopkgtest [15:05:0
On 2022-04-25 17:16:35, Tino Mettler wrote:
> Hi, Antoine,
>
> I run autopkgtest after the build process with the following result:
>
> # autopkgtest ./ -- qemu autopkgtest-unstable.img
> autopkgtest [15:05:05]: starting date: 2022-04-25
> autopkgtest [15:05:05]: version 5.21
> autopkgtest [15:05:0
Hi, Antoine,
I run autopkgtest after the build process with the following result:
# autopkgtest ./ -- qemu autopkgtest-unstable.img
autopkgtest [15:05:05]: starting date: 2022-04-25
autopkgtest [15:05:05]: version 5.21
autopkgtest [15:05:05]: host mac; command line: /usr/bin/autopkgtest ./ -- qem
Full quote
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:25:02PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> El 22/04/22 a las 11:09, Christian Göttsche escribió:
> > > Is it really urgency=medium? low wouldn't fit?
> >
> > I never used anything else than the default medium; happy to reduce to
> > low if wished.
>
> I d
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 10:32:05PM +0200, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > You have actually configured it in the package, so it would be better if
> > it actually works. :) Try just running `autopkgtest` in the source
> > directory..
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/autopkgtest
>
> H
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:31:50 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2022-04-24 22:32:05, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > Am 24.04.2022 um 22:04 schrieb Antoine Beaupré :
> > I was not aware that the package defines any test specific bits. Can you
> > point me to the relevant part? I had the impression that
Control: owner -1 anar...@debian.org
On 2022-04-24 22:32:05, Tino Mettler wrote:
> Am 24.04.2022 um 22:04 schrieb Antoine Beaupré :
>>
>> You have actually configured it in the package, so it would be better if
>> it actually works. :) Try just running `autopkgtest` in the source
>> directory..
>
El 22/04/22 a las 11:09, Christian Göttsche escribió:
> > Is it really urgency=medium? low wouldn't fit?
>
> I never used anything else than the default medium; happy to reduce to
> low if wished.
I don't think reducing is really needed. I'd upload to a DELAYED queue
though, which is a different
Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:28:07 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: backintime/1.3.2-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- simple
backup/snapshot system
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009834,
regarding RFS: backintime/1.3.2-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- simple backup/snapshot system
to be marked as
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:52:39 +0200 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
backintime (1.3.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1008653, #865744).
You missed to copy the copyright change
11 matches
Mail list logo
