Em ter., 15 de mar. de 2022 às 13:29, escreveu:
>
> > > Why should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are
> > > technical problems caused by that?
> >
> > So such as not compiling. Or another reason not yet shared with us.
> >
>
> No problem with building the package. I just sa
On 15/03/2022 14:53, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:49:50PM +, Peter wrote:
No need to repack the source tarball,
so version number changed.
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xbrzscale/xbrzscale_1.8-1.dsc
Hi!
I'm afraid the autopkgtest fails:
autop
> > Why should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are
> > technical problems caused by that?
>
> So such as not compiling. Or another reason not yet shared with us.
>
No problem with building the package. I just saw a comment on a bug and I was
in doubt [1].
I decided to ask
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:49:50PM +, Peter wrote:
> No need to repack the source tarball,
> so version number changed.
>dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xbrzscale/xbrzscale_1.8-1.dsc
Hi!
I'm afraid the autopkgtest fails:
autopkgtest [15:40:01]: test test1: [--
The Debian package "rush" has not been updated since 2017. The upstream
software is actively maintained and has advanced from the 1.x version in
Debian to version 2.x (the latest version is 2.2 released Jan 2022). I
filed a bug in Dec 2021 to have the upstream changes packaged, but no
response
No need to repack the source tarball,
so version number changed.
Version : 1.8-1
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xbrzscale/xbrzscale_1.8-1.dsc
6 matches
Mail list logo
