Bug#1006594: RFS: vfu/4.23-1~bpo11+1 -- Versatile text-based file-manager

2022-03-03 Thread Boian Bonev
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > >  vfu (4.23-1~bpo11+1) bullseye-backports; urgency=medium > >  . > >    * Rebuild for bullseye-backports. > > First off: Please only send backport sponsorship requests for > packages that formally qualify for backporting. This > version has not arrived in bookworm

Re: A question about "non official" debian packages

2022-03-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 16:30 +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote: > Is it frowned upon by the Debian community to use the .deb format to > publish these packages? While it is fine to publish .deb packages outside of Debian, it is usually better for everyone and recommended by Debian to get them inc

Re: A question about "non official" debian packages

2022-03-03 Thread Michael Stehmann
Hello, there are a lot of packages in deb format published outside the Debian community (esp. by some distributions, but also by some so called upstream projects). The deb format is an open standard. But there are some differences between Debian packages and packages using the deb format.

Re: A question about "non official" debian packages

2022-03-03 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:29:47PM +0100, Ali Mezgani wrote: > On 03/03/2022, at 17:27, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote: > >> Dear mentors, > >> I plan to publish (at least) 4 Debian packages. > >> > >> The format is ideal for my

Re: A question about "non official" debian packages

2022-03-03 Thread Ali Mezgani
Rahmatullin, I remember you and I remember you contributions. > On 03/03/2022, at 17:27, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> I plan to publish (at least) 4 Debian packages. >> >> The format is ideal for my use

Re: A question about "non official" debian packages

2022-03-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote: > Dear mentors, > I plan to publish (at least) 4 Debian packages. > > The format is ideal for my users to install, and the .deb format takes care > of installing .info files at the right place, something I find impossible to

A question about "non official" debian packages

2022-03-03 Thread Albert van der Horst
Dear mentors, I plan to publish (at least) 4 Debian packages. The format is ideal for my users to install, and the .deb format takes care of installing .info files at the right place, something I find impossible to do. Is it frowned upon by the Debian community to use the .deb format to publis

Re: Regarding how to join open source

2022-03-03 Thread Ali Mezgani
Anish, Open source is a great initiative ans philosophy that universities must adopt. However if you try in your free time to build a community : a community of students over a simple network you should learn more about How humain and brain humain’s can drive. Know that I’m part of IETF, Linux

Re: Regarding how to join open source

2022-03-03 Thread Albert van der Horst
> Op 26-02-2022 19:58 schreef Anish Kumbhar : > > > Hi Sir/Madam, > I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE. > I know C,html,C++, and am learning web development and python.  > I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process. > This will be my fir

Bug#1006722: RFS: ibus-keymagic/1.4-1 [ITP] -- keymagic engine for IBus

2022-03-03 Thread Ko Ko Ye`
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ibus-keymagic": * Package name: ibus-keymagic Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : kokoye2007 * URL : https://keymagic.net * License : GPL-2.0+, MIT *

Bug#1006698: marked as done (RFS: rednotebook/2.24+ds-1~bpo10+1 -- Modern desktop diary and personal journaling tool)

2022-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:03:18 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: rednotebook/2.24+ds-1~bpo10+1 -- Modern desktop diary and personal journaling tool has caused the Debian Bug report #1006698, regarding RFS: rednotebook/2.24+ds-1~bpo10+1 -- Modern desktop diary and perso