On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:09:54 +0200
"Diego M. Rodriguez" wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:30:24 +0200 Jeroen Ploemen
> wrote:
> > In that case, for lack of a better option, the upstream git commits
> > could serve as a basis for the years.
>
> Noted - in this instance, 2015 is also the date of
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpp-httplib":
* Package name: cpp-httplib
Version : 0.9.4+ds-1
Upstream Author : Yuji Hirose
* URL : https:/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sosreport":
* Package name: sosreport
Version : 4.2-1
Upstream Author : Bryn M. Reeves
* URL : https://github.com/sosreport/sos
* License : GPL-2+, GP
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:30:24 +0200 Jeroen Ploemen wrote:
> In that case, for lack of a better option, the upstream git commits could
> serve as a basis for the years.
Noted - in this instance, 2015 is also the date of the initial git
commit in the upstream repo. Could you let me know if your ment
Hi,
Also see
https://github.com/shlomif/fortune-mod/blob/master/scripts/debian-packaging/build-rinutils-debian-package--using-docker.pl
for a build-in-docker program.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:09:54 +0200
"Diego M. Rodriguez" wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-jellyfish":
hi Diego,
copyright:
* various copyright holders listed in d/copyrig
Hi!
Hi, it fails to build:
checking for rpc/types.h... no
configure: error: Sorry, rpc/types.h is needed.
tail -v -n \+0 config.log
The glibc package dropped rpc in 2.31-14.
The new RFS for Aberta was not intended and came accidentally with the
DUNE modules batch. Currently we are i
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:53:40 +0200
"Diego M. Rodriguez" wrote:
> > copyright: where does the 2015 upstream copyright year come from?
>
> I think it was added during the initial packaging based on the year of
> the first upstream public release, but indeed there is no explicit
> mention of 2015
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hello Jeroen,
and thanks for the review!
> copyright: where does the 2015 upstream copyright year come from?
I think it was added during the initial packaging based on the year of
the first upstream public release, but indeed there is no explicit
mention of 2015 in t
9 matches
Mail list logo
